Preview

Sociology of Power

Advanced search

Why Frailty Is Needed, or Living a Meaningful Life with Disability

EDN: BJXLGD

Abstract

The article proposes a radical reconceptualization of frailty—a condition traditionally viewed as a manifestation of weakness, decline, and loss of dignity. The authors criticize leading approaches in academic and public discourse that reduce frailty either to medical diagnoses or to moral deficiency, arguing instead for understanding frailty as a socially constructed, existential, and ethical phenomenon. Drawing on qualitative research conducted in 2025 across six regions of Russia—including over 200 interviews with participants in the long-term care system—the study shows that fear of frailty often exceeds fear of death and is closely tied to the perception of oneself as a “burden.” Yet the life narratives of individuals with severe physical limitations, including care recipients with disabilities, reveal an alternative perspective: frailty can serve as the foundation for reciprocal, mutually enriching relationships of care, rather than one-sided “service provision.” The authors identify three key dimensions: (1) interdependence and reciprocity as the basis of care; (2) the social construction of frailty through perception and institutional frameworks; and (3) the isomorphism between frailty and life itself—its fragility, vulnerability, and authenticity. In this light, frailty ceases to be a deficit and instead becomes a meaningful expression of the human condition, strengthening social bonds and affirming human dignity even under conditions of total dependency. This reframing invites not only a rethinking of care practices but also a reimagining of the ethics of engaging with vulnerable members of society, affirming the value of life in all its manifestations—even in profound dependency and fragility. The authors call for a shift from a paradigm of autonomy to a paradigm of encounter, where care is understood as shared presence within a space of mutual recognition.

About the Authors

D. M. Rogozin
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Dmitry M. Rogozin — Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Head of the Laboratory for Field Research); Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow



A. A. Chentsova
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Alexandra A. Chentsova — Junior Researcher, the Laboratory for Field Research

Moscow



References

1. Lazebnik L. B., Konev Yu. V. (2024) Aging, frailty, and weakness syndrome in the elderly. Clinical Gerontology, 30(11–12), pp. 3–8. https://doi.org/10.26347/16072499202411-12003-008. (in Russ.)

2. Severyukhina E. E., Saleev V. B. (2014) Frailty in old age as a reason for emergency medical calls. Tyumen Medical Journal, 16(2), рр. 34–35. (in Russ.)

3. Rogozin, D. M. (2024) A healthy lifestyle in old age. Sotsiologiya vlasti (Sociology of Power), 36(2), рр. 55–77. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-2-55-77 (in Russ.)

4. Alexander C., Charles G. (2009) Caring, mutuality and reciprocity in social worker-client relationships. Journal of Social Work, 9(1), рр. 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017308098420

5. Barrett P., Twitchin S., Kletchko S., Ryan F. (2006) The living environments of community-dwelling older people who become frail: Another look at the living standards of older New Zealanders survey. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 28, рр. 133–157.

6. Bassola B., Cilluffo S., Lusignani M. (2021) Going inside the relationship between caregiver and care-receiver with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Italy, a Grounded Theory study. Health and Social Care in the Community, 29(4), рр. 1083–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13142

7. Bon A. E., Gomes B., Etkind S. N., Verne J. (2018) What is the impact of population ageing on the future provision of end-of-life care? Population-based projections of place of death. Palliative Medicine, 32(2), рр. 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317734435

8. Buse C., Nettleton S., Martin D., Twigg J. (2017) Imagined bodies: architects and their constructions of later life. Ageing and Society, 37(7), рр. 1435–1457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X16000362

9. Dassel K. B., Carr D. C., Vitaliano P. (2017) Does caring for a spouse with dementia accelerate cognitive decline? Findings from the Health and Retirement Study. The Gerontologist, 57(2), рр. 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv148

10. Ferreira R., Derhun F. M., Carreira L., Baldissera V. D. A., Radovanovic C. A. T., Mariano P. P. (2021) Professional competency for elder care: Perception among professors, nursing students, and nurses. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 74(Suppl. 2), e20200446. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0446

11. Gilleard C., Higgs P. F. (2010) Frailty, disability and old age: A re-appraisal. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 15(5), рр. 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459310383595

12. Gubrium J. F. (1993) Speaking of life: Horizons of meaning for nursing home residents. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

13. Kaufman S. (1994) The social construction of frailty: An anthropological perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 8(1), рр. 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-4065(94)90018-3

14. Lynch K., Lyons M., Cantillon S. (2009) Love labouring: Power and mutuality. In K. Lynch, J. Baker, M. Lyons (Eds.), Affective equality: Love, care and injustice (pp. 113–130). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245082_7

15. Parker S. G., Corner L., Laing K., Nestor G., Craig D., Collerton J., Frith J., Roberts H. C., Sayer A. A., Allan L. M., Robinson L., Cowan K. (2019) Priorities for research in multiple conditions in later life (multi-morbidity): Findings from a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership. Age and Ageing, 48(3), рр. 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afz014

16. Pinquart M., Sörensen S. (2011) Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults: A meta-analytic comparison. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), рр. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021863

17. Pivodic L., Smets T., Van den Noortgate N., Onwuteaka-Philipsen B. D., Engels Y., Szczerbińska K., Finne-Soveri H., Froggatt K., Gambassi G., Deliens L., Van den Block L. (2018) Quality of dying and quality of end-of-life care of nursing home residents in six countries: An epidemiological study. Palliative Medicine, 32(10), рр. 1584–1595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216318800610

18. Roth D. L., Fredman L., Haley W. E. (2015) Informal caregiving and its impact on health: A reappraisal from population-based studies. The Gerontologist, 55(2), рр. 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu177

19. Vernooij-Dassen M., Leatherman S., Rikkert M. O. (2011) Quality of care in frail older people: The fragile balance between receiving and giving. BMJ, 342, d403. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d403

20. Wachterman M. W., Pilver C., Smith D., Ersek M., Lipsitz S. R., Keating N. L. (2016) Quality of end-of-life care provided to patients with different serious illnesses. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(8), рр. 1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1200

21. Yang Y., Lee L. C. (2010) Dynamics and heterogeneity in the process of human frailty and aging: Evidence from the U. S. older adult population. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 65B(2), рр. 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp102

22. Yamada M., Arai H. (2020) Long-term care system in Japan. Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research, 24(3), рр. 174–180. https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.20.0037


Review

For citations:


Rogozin D.M., Chentsova A.A. Why Frailty Is Needed, or Living a Meaningful Life with Disability. Sociology of Power. 2026;38(1):55-76. (In Russ.) EDN: BJXLGD

Views: 188

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0492 (Print)
ISSN 2413-144X (Online)