“The Boys Don’t Apologize”: A Sociological Conceptualization of the Kazan Phenomenon

    “Boys don’t apologize” is not a TV slogan or nostalgia for “fights for asphalt,” but a working principle of a street culture of honor that emerged at the intersection of institutional breakdown, migration, and new urban anonymity. We read Slovo patsana (The Boy’s Word) by Robert Goraev as a dense corpus of testimony and translate it into sociological language: from anomie and social disorganization to initiation rituals; from “chushpan” as stigma to the technique of boundary-drawing; from masculine bodily regimes to street-level legal pluralism and “micro-Leviathans” that generate order from below where the state is effectively switched off. We turn to sociological theory as a slab of static asphalt to account for the blood on the boys — since they themselves frequently say they “just fell.” In doing so, we close the theoretical gap left by the book’s narrative style and offer readers a set of lenses through which familiar plots cease to be “local exotica” and become recognizable mechanisms for producing order and violence. Addressed not only to sociologists and criminologists, the review shows why the Kazan phenomenon still resonates and renders urban “noise” into a structure of rules, practices of body, and emergent orders. Thus the case stops being a “local history” and becomes an instrument: it calibrates our language for describing informal authority and street order; in this article we unpack a mechanism recognizable not only in the “Kazan template,” but also in today’s back alleys and Telegram chats.

1. Volkov V. V. (2005) Violent Entrepreneurship: An Economic-Sociological Analysis. Publishing House of the State University — Higher School of Economics. EDN: YWVMYZ. (in Russ.)

2. Anderson E. (1999) Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: W. W. Norton. 352 p.

3. Anderson E. (2009) Inclusive Masculinity: The Changing Nature of Masculinities. London: Routledge. 208 p.

4. Barth F. (1969) Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget. 153 p.

5. Becker H. S. (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press. 179 p.

6. Butler J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge. 236 p.

7. Cohen A. K. (1955) Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. Glencoe: Free Press. 202 p.

8. Connell R. W. (1987) Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 334 p.

9. Densley J. A. (2013) How Gangs Work: An Ethnography of Youth Violence. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 213 p.

10. Dong B., Gibson C. L., Krohn M. D. (2015) Gang membership in a developmental and life-course perspective. In: Decker S. H., Pyrooz D. C. (Eds.), The Handbook of Gangs (pp. 78–97). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118726822.ch5

11. Durkheim E. (1952/1897) Suicide: A Study in Sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

12. Fraser A. (2015) Urban Legends: Gang Identity in the Post-Industrial City. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 304 p.

13. Fraser A., Piacentini L. (2019) Gangs and Globalization: New Perspectives on Youth, Crime and Justice. London: Routledge. 224 p.

14. Galeotti M. (2018) The Vory: Russia’s Super Mafia. New Haven: Yale University Press. 344 p.

15. Griffiths J. (1986) What is Legal Pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 24, рр. 1–55. doi: 10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387

16. Ledeneva A. V. (1998) Russia’s Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking and Informal Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 256 p.

17. McGloin J. M., Schreck C. J., Stewart E. A., Ousey G. C. (2011) Predicting the violent offender: The discriminant validity of the subculture of violence. Criminology, 49(3), рр. 767–794. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00235.x

18. Mendoza-Denton N. (2008) Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice among Latina Youth Gangs. London: Blackwell.

19. Mendoza-Denton N. (1996) “Muy Macha”: Gender and ideology in gang-girls’ discourse about makeup. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 61, рр. 47–63. doi: 10.1080/00141844.1996.9981527

20. Merton R. K. (1938) Social Structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), рр. 672–682.

21. Merton R. K. (1957) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press. 645 p.

22. Messerschmidt J. W. (2010/2004) Hegemonic Masculinities and Camouflaged Politics: Unmasking the Bush Dynasty and Its War Against Iraq. Boulder: Paradigm. 216 p.

23. Nisbett R. E., Cohen D. (1996) Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South. Boulder: Westview Press. 119 p.

24. Pateman C. (1988) The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

25. Pateman C., Mills C. W. (2007) Contract and Domination. Cambridge: Polity Press.

26. Sampson R. J. (2012) Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

27. Simmel G. (1950/1903) The Metropolis and Mental Life. In: The Sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 409–424). New York: Free Press.

28. Stephenson S. (2011) The Kazan Leviathan: Russian Street Gangs as Agents of Social Order. The Sociological Review, 59(2), рр. 324–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02007.x

29. Sutherland E. H. (1939) Principles of Criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott. 651 p.

30. Turner V. (1969) The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine. 213 p.

31. van Gennep A. (1960/1909) The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 198 p.

32. Varese F. (2001) The Russian Mafia: Private Protection in a New Market Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 304 p.

33. Wacquant L. (2008) Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge: Polity. 360 p.

34. Wildeman C., Sampson R. J. (2024) Desistance as an intergenerational process. Annual Review of Criminology, 7, рр. 85–104. doi: 10.1146/annurev-criminol-022422-015936

35. Wolfgang M. E., Ferracuti F. (1967) The Subculture of Violence: Towards an Integrated Theory in Criminology. London: Tavistock. 387 p.