Empirical Legal Studies in Russia: Expanding Boundaries

1. Belov M. D., Kazun A. P. (2024) Beware of his car: why are men more dangerous than women behind the wheel? Sociology of Power, 36(2), рр. 142–163. EDN: OTALLU. doi: 10.22394/2074-0492-2024-2-142-163. (in Russ.)

2. Volkov V. V. (2005) Violent Entrepreneurship: An Economic-Sociological Analysis. Publishing House of the State University — Higher School of Economics. EDN: YWVMYZ (in Russ.)

3. Goffman E. (2019) Total Institutions: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Moscow: Elementary Forms. (in Russ.)

4. Zhuchkova S. V., Devyatnikov V. Yu., Kazun A. P., Belov M. D., Sidorova O. I. (2025) Texts of court verdicts as a data source for empirical legal research in Russia. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (2), рр. 170–192. EDN: GZHDTO. doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2025.2.2575. (in Russ.)

5. Kolosnitsyna M. G., Zolotareva A. (2024) The impact of external shocks on unhealthy behavior: the COVID-19 pandemic and alcohol consumption. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (1), рр. 1–22. EDN: YCGVCE. doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2024.1.2510. (in Russ.)

6. Sabirova G. A. (2012) “Difficult stories about themselves and the zone”: responses and challenges to normative ideas in the life stories of women with experience of imprisonment (pp. 105–140). In Omelchenko E. L. (Ed.) Before and after prison. Women’s stories. Aletheia. (in Russ.)

7. Apel A. B., Diller J. W. (2016) Prison as Punishment: A Behavior-Analytic Evaluation of Incarceration. The Behavior Analyst, 40(1), рр. 243–256. doi: 10.1007/s40614-016-0081-6

8. Araújo S. (2025) Legal Pluralism as Co-Presence: Disobeying the Hierarchies of the Western Canon. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, ahead of print. doi: 10.35295/osls.iisl.1931

9. Bardhan P., Mitra S., Mookherjee D., Nath A. (2024) How Do Voters Respond to Welfare Vis-a-Vis Public Good Programs? Theory and Evidence of Political Clientelism. SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4731067. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4731067

10. Barnes M. L., Obasogie O. K. (2025) Introduction to the Special Issue on Empirical Methods and Critical Race Theory. Law & Society Review, 59(2), рр. 231–238. doi: 10.1017/lsr.2025.27

11. Dölling D., Entorf H., Hermann D., Rupp T. (2009) Is Deterrence Effective? Results of a Meta-Analysis of Punishment. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(1), рр. 201–224. doi: 10.1007/s10610-008-9097-0

12. Drake E. K., Aos S., Miller M. G. (2009) Evidence-Based Public Policy Options to Reduce Crime and Criminal Justice Costs: Implications in Washington State. Victims & Offenders, 4(2), рр. 170–196. doi: 10.1080/15564880802612615

13. Griffiths J. (1970) Ideology in Criminal Procedure or a Third “Model” of the Criminal Process. The Yale Law Journal, 79(3), рр. 359–417.

14. Hu L., Kohler-Hausmann I. (2025) What Is Perceived When Race Is Perceived and Why It Matters for Causal Inference and Discrimination Studies. Law & Society Review, 59(2), рр. 239–264. doi: 10.1017/lsr.2024.36

15. Lazarev E. (2023) State-Building as Lawfare: Custom, Sharia, and State Law in Postwar Chechnya. Cambridge University Press.

16. Meaux L. T., Cox J., Kopkin M. R. (2018) Saving Damsels, Sentencing Deviants and Selective Chivalry Decisions: Juror Decision-Making in an Ambiguous Assault Case. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 25(5), рр. 724–736. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1474817

17. Miščikienė L., Trišauskė J., Štelemėkas M., Astromskė K. (2025) Explaining the Link Between Alcohol and Homicides: Insights from the Analysis of Legal Cases in Lithuania. Medicina, 61(4), рр. 657. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040657

18. Nagin D. S. (2013) Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century. Crime and Justice, 42, рр. 199–263. doi: 10.1086/670398

19. Naimi T. S., Xuan Z., Cooper S. E., Coleman S. M., Hadland S. E., Swahn M. H., Heeren T. (2016) Alcohol Involvement in Homicide Victimization in the United States. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 40(12), рр. 2614–2621. doi: 10.1111/acer.13230

20. Packer H. (1964) Two Models of the Criminal Process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 113(1), рр. 1–68.

21. Radaev V., Roshchina Y. (2021) Decline in Alcohol Consumption in Russia: Collectivity or Polarisation? Drug and Alcohol Review, 40(3), рр. 481–488. doi: 10.1111/dar.13253

22. Rossow I. (2001) Alcohol and Homicide: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Relationship in 14 European Countries. Addiction, 96(Suppl 1), рр. S77–S92. doi: 10.1080/09652140020021198

23. Salisbury E. J., Crawford A. (2025) Gender-Responsive Treatment to Improve Outcomes for Women and Girls in Correctional Settings: Foundations, Limitations and Innovations. Health & Justice, 13(1), рр. 11. doi: 10.1186/s40352-025-00316-w

24. Salisbury E. J., Van Voorhis P. (2009) Gendered Pathways: A Quantitative Investigation of Women Probationers’ Paths to Incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), рр. 541–566. doi: 10.1177/0093854809334076

25. Stephenson S. (2011) The Kazan Leviathan: Russian Street Gangs as Agents of Social Order. The Sociological Review, 59(2), рр. 324–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02007.x

26. Swenson G. (2018) Legal Pluralism in Theory and Practice. International Studies Review, 20(3), рр. 438–462. doi: 10.1093/isr/vix060

27. Tamanaha B. Z. (2021) Legal Pluralism Explained: History, Theory, Consequences. Oxford University Press.

28. Zhuchkova S. (2021) Algorithm Sveta (The Algorithm of Light). The source code. https://github.com/LanaLob/algorithm_sveta

29. Zhuchkova S., Kazun A. (2023) Exploring Gender Bias in Homicide Sentencing: An Empirical Study of Russian Court Decisions Using Text Mining. Homicide Studies, 29(2), рр. 133–156. doi: 10.1177/10887679231217159