Культура и познание: в поисках не-редукционистского подхода
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-2-104-124
EDN: LYYUYI
Аннотация
В фокусе статьи находится анализ теорий культуры и познания в современной социологии культуры. Автор рассматривает две конкурирующие исследовательские традиции в когнитивной социологии культуры, опирающиеся на микро-индивидуалистские и коллективистские модели социологического объяснения соответственно. Сперва автор критически анализирует два теоретических подхода, существующих в рамках «микро-индивидуалистской» парадигмы: «дуально-процессную» модель культуры-в-действии Стивена Вейзи и типологию культурных форм Омара Лизардо. Автор утверждает, что оба подхода являются проработанными и теоретически глубокими, но тяготеют к неоправданному редуцированию культуры до ее микрооснований. Автор затем дает критическую оценку содержательных предпосылок так называемой «зерубавелианской» парадигмы культурной социологии, принадлежащей к «коллективистской» ветви теоретизирования, а также отдельно останавливается на серии работ по проблематике культуры и познания, представленных культурсоциологами-неодюрк-геймианцами. Автор приходит к заключению, что теоретические предложения «зерубавелианцев» и неодюркгеймианцев основаны на проблематичных допущениях о способах хранения и передачи культурного знания. В статье делается вывод о том, что ни индивидуалистские, ни коллективистские теории не могут адекватно объяснить взаимосвязь культуры и познания, так как зиждутся на редукционистских онтологических основаниях. По мнению автора, для преодоления этих ограничений необходимо обратиться к онтологической доктрине «натурализованного критического реализма» Туукки Каидесойя, черпающей идеи из двух источников: системной онтологии Марио Бунге и концепций «распределенного познания» в когнитивных науках. В статье представлен предварительный черновой набросок подхода к объяснению взаимосвязи культуры и познания, основанного на концепции производства, распространения и трансформации репрезентаций в распределенных когнитивных системах. |
Об авторе
Дмитрий Д. Шариков
Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», Москва, Россия
Россия
Россия
аспирант департамента социологии
НИУ ВШЭ
Список литературы
1. Archer M. (1988) Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory, Cambridge:
2. Cambridge University Press.
3. Bhaskar R. (1979) The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of Contemporary
4. Human Sciences, Brighton: Harvester Press.
5. Brekhus W. (2007) The Rutgers School: A Zerubavelian Culturalist Cognitive Sociology. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3): 448–464.
6. Brekhus W.H., Ignatow G. (2019) Cognitive Sociology and the Cultural Mind: Debates,
7. Directions, and Challenges. W. H. Brekhus, G. Ignatow (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of
8. Cognitive Sociology, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–30.
9. Bunge M. (1996) Finding Philosophy in Social Science, New Haven: Yale University Press.
10. Bunge M. (1997) Mechanism and Explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27(4):
11. –465.
12. Bunge M. (1998) Social Science under Debate: A Philosophical Perspective, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
13. Bunge M. (2001) Philosophy in Crises: The Need for Reconstruction, New York: Prometheus
14. Books.
15. Bunge M. (2003) Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
16. Button G. (2008) Against Distributed Cognition. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(2): 87–104.
17. Cerulo K. (2010) Mining the Intersections of Cognitive Sociology and Neuroscience.
18. Poetics, 38(2): 115–132.
19. Cerulo K. (2018). Scents and Sensibility: Olfaction, Sense-Making, and Meaning Attribution. American Sociological Review, 83(2): 361–89.
20. Clark A. (1998) Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again, Cambridge,
21. MA: MIT press.
22. Clark A., Chalmers D. (1998) The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1): 7–19.
23. Coulter J. (2008) Twenty-Five Theses against Cognitivism. Theory, Culture & Society,
24. (2):19–32.
25. Danna K. (2014) The Study of Culture and Cognition. Sociological Forum, 29(4):
26. –6.
27. DiMaggio P. (2002) Why Cognitive (and Cultural) Sociology Needs Cognitive Psychology. K. A. Cerulo (ed.) Culture in mind: Toward a sociology of culture and cognition, New
28. York: Routledge: 274–81.
29. Haidt J. (2001) The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgement. Psychological Review, 108(4): 814–34.
30. Han S., Northoff G., Vogeley K., Wexler B.E., Kitayama S., and Varnum M.E.W. (2013) A
31. Cultural Neuroscience Approach to the Biosocial Nature of the Human Brain. Annual
32. Review of Psychology, 64(1): 335–59.
33. Herrmann E., Call J., Hernàndez-Lloreda M.V., Hare B., Tomasello M. (2007) Humans
34. Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis. Science, 317(5843): 1360–66.
35. Hoffmann J. P. (2014) Religiousness, Social Networks, Moral Schemas, and Marijuana Use: A Dynamic Dual-Process Model of Culture and Behavior. Social Forces, 93(1):
36. –208.
37. Hutchins E. (1995) Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
38. Hutto D.D., Myin E. (2013) Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without Content, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Ignatow G. (2014) Ontology and Method in Cognitive Sociology. Sociological Forum,
40. (4): 990-994.
41. Kaidesoja T. (2013a) Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology, New York: Routledge.
42. Kaidesoja T. (2013b) Overcoming the Biases of Microfoundationalism: Social Mechanisms and Collective Agents. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 43(3):
43. –322.
44. Keren G., Schul Y. (2009) Two Is Not Always Better than One: A Critical Evaluation of
45. Two-System Theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(6): 533–550.
46. Kurakin D. (2019) The Sacred, Profane, Pure, Impure, and Social Energization of Culture. W. H. Brekhus, G. Ignatow (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Sociology, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 485–506.
47. Kurakin D. (2020) Culture and Cognition: The Durkheimian Principle of Sui Generis
48. Synthesis vs. Cognitive-Based Models of Culture. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 8(1): 63–89.
49. Leschziner V., Brett G. (2019) Beyond Two Minds: Cognitive, Embodied, and Evaluative Processes in Creativity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 82(4): 340–366.
50. Lizardo O. (2004) The Cognitive Origins of Bourdieu’s Habitus. Journal for the Theory of
51. Social Behaviour, 34(4): 375–401.
52. Lizardo O. (2007) “Mirror Neurons”, Collective Objects and the Problem of Transmission: Reconsidering Stephen Turner’s Critique of Practice Theory. Journal for the
53. Theory of Social Behaviour, 37(3): 319–350.
54. Lizardo O. (2014) Beyond the Comtean Schema: The Sociology of Culture and Cognition versus Cognitive Social Science’. Sociological Forum, 29(4): 983–989.
55. Lizardo O. (2015) Culture, Cognition and Embodiment. J. D. Wright (ed.) International
56. Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences 5: 576–181.
57. Lizardo O. (2017) Improving Cultural Analysis: Considering Personal Culture
58. in Its Declarative and Nondeclarative Modes. American Sociological Review, 82(1):
59. –115.
60. Lizardo O. (2019) Compositional Pluralism, Causal History, and the Concept of Culture. Culturecog. Retrieved 8 March 2020: https://culturecog.blog/2019/10/02/compositional-pluralism-causal-history-and-the-concept-of-culture/.
61. Lizardo O. (2020) A Typology of Cultural Practices. Culturecog. Retrieved 9 March 2020:
62. https://culturecog.blog/2020/01/05/a-typology-of-cultural-practices/.
63. Lizardo O., Mowry R., Sepulvado B., Stoltz D.S., Taylor M.A., Van Ness J., Wood M.
64. (2016) What Are Dual Process Models? Implications for Cultural Analysis in Sociology. Sociological Theory, 34(4): 287–310.
65. Lizardo O, Sepulvado B., Stoltz D.S., Taylor M.A. (2020) What Can Cognitive Neuroscience Do for Cultural Sociology? American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 8(1): 3–28.
66. Lizardo O., Strand M. (2010) Skills, Toolkits, Contexts and Institutions: Clarifying
67. the Relationship between Different Approaches to Cognition in Cultural Sociology.
68. Poetics, 38(2): 205–228.
69. Martin J.L. (2010) Life’s a Beach but You’re an Ant, and Other Unwelcome News for
70. the Sociology of Culture. Poetics, 38(2): 229–244.
71. Mast J.L. (2020) Representationalism and Cognitive Culturalism: Riders on Elephants on Turtles All the Way Down. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 8(1):
72. –123.
73. McDonnell T. E. (2014) Drawing out Culture: Productive Methods to Measure Cognition and Resonance. Theory and Society, 43(3/4):247–74.
74. Menary R. (2010) Introduction to the Special Issue on 4E Cognition. Phenomenology
75. and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4): 459–463.
76. Miłkowski M., Clowes R., Rucińska Z., Przegalińska A., Zawidzki T., Krueger J., Gies
77. A., McGann M., Afeltowicz Ł., Wachowski W., Stjernberg F., Loughlin V., Hohol M..
78. (2018) From Wide Cognition to Mechanisms: A Silent Revolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.
79. Norton M. (2019) Meaning on the Move: Synthesizing Cognitive and Systems Concepts of Culture. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 7(1): 1–28.
80. Norton M. (2020) Cultural Sociology Meets the Cognitive Wild: Advantages of the
81. Distributed Cognition Framework for Analyzing the Intersection of Culture and
82. Cognition. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 8(1): 45–62.
83. Patterson O. (2014) Making Sense of Culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 40:1–30.
84. Psillos S. (2005) Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, New York: Routledge.
85. Ringmar E. (2020) How Do Performances Fuse Societies? American Journal of Cultural
86. Sociology, 8(1): 29–44.
87. Sewell W.H. (2005) Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation, Chicago:
88. University of Chicago Press.
89. Sperber D. (1996) Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge.
90. Srivastava S.B., Banaji M. R. (2011) Culture, Cognition, and Collaborative Networks
91. in Organizations. American Sociological Review, 76(2): 207–33.
92. Stanovich K.E. (2009) Distinguishing the Reflective, Algorithmic, and Autonomous Minds: Is It Time for a Tri-Process Theory. J. S. B. Evans and K. Frankish (eds) In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press:
93. –88.
94. Strydom P. (2007) Introduction: A Cartography of Contemporary Cognitive Social
95. Theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3): 339–56.
96. Sun R. (2012) Prolegomena to Cognitive Social Sciences. R. Sun (ed.) Grounding Social
97. Sciences in Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT press: 3–32.
98. Swidler A. (1986) Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological
99. Review, 51: 273–286.
100. Taylor M.A., Stoltz D.S., McDonnell T.E. (2019) Binding Significance to Form: Cultural
101. Objects, Neural Binding, and Cultural Change. Poetics, 73: 1–16.
102. Theiner G., O’Connor T. (2010) The Emergence of Group Cognition. A. Corradini,
103. T. O’Connor (eds.) Emergence in science and philosophy, New York: Routledge: 78–117.
104. Thompson V.A. (2009) Dual Process Theories: A Metacognitive Perspective.
105. J.S.B. Evans and K. Frankish (eds.) In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond, Oxford:
106. Oxford University Press: 171–95.
107. Tomasello M., Carpenter M., Call J., Behne T., Moll H. (2005) Understanding and
108. Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5): 675–91.
109. Turner S.P. (1994) The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge, and Presuppositions, Chicago: University of Chicago press.
110. Turner S.P. (2007a) Social Theory as a Cognitive Neuroscience. European Journal of
111. Social Theory, 10(3): 357–374.
112. Turner S.P. (2007b) Mirror Neurons and Practices: A Response to Lizardo. Journal for
113. the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37(3): 351–371.
114. Turner S.P. (2014) Understanding the Tacit, New York: Routledge.
115. Turner S.P. (2018) Cognitive Science and the Social: A Primer, New York: Routledge.
116. Vaisey S. (2008) Socrates, Skinner, and Aristotle: Three Ways of Thinking About Culture in Action. Sociological Forum, 23(3): 603–613.
117. Vaisey S. (2009) Motivation and Justification: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in
118. Action. American Journal of Sociology, 114(6): 1675–1715.
119. Vila-Henninger L.A. (2015) Toward Defining the Causal Role of Consciousness: Using Models of Memory and Moral Judgment from Cognitive Neuroscience to Expand
120. the Sociological Dual-Process Model. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(2):
121. –260.
122. Zerubavel E. (1997) Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology, Cambridge,
123. MA: Harvard University Press.
124. Zhang J., Norman D.A. (1994) Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks. Cognitive Science, 18(1): 87–122.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Шариков Д.Д. Культура и познание: в поисках не-редукционистского подхода. Социология власти. 2020;32(2):104-124. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-2-104-124. EDN: LYYUYI
For citation:
Sharikov D.D. Culture and Cognition: In Search of a Non-reductionist Framework. Sociology of Power. 2020;32(2):104-124. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-2-104-124. EDN: LYYUYI
Просмотров:
9
Послать статью по эл. почте 