Social Distancing as Cooperative Action: Affiliation and Disaffiliation during the Pandemic

The article considers the problem of the cooperation of participants in everyday interactions while doing social distancing. "Social distance" has become one of the symbols and the new reality of the pandemic. For sociologists, social distance most often serves as a metaphor for social relations that takes shape today when restrictions on face-to-face contacts are imposed by officials, employers, or people themselves. But social distance is also a practical problem that everyday actors have to deal with in routine circumstances. The article examines the grammar of social distancing that can be found in everyday situations, and describes how this grammar is realized in two particular cases, one of which demonstrates affiliation between the participants while the other demonstrates 76 disaffiliation. It is shown that in both cases some form of cooperation is present: in the case of affiliation, cooperation is observed following social distancing and involves monitoring the actions of the other, while in the case of disaffiliation, cooperation is observed prior to the instance of nondistancing and involves not monitoring the other. These observations allow us to take a critical look at the possibility of applying the classical sociological notion of "solidarity" to the phenomenon of social distancing.

1. Bourdieu P. (2007) Physical Space and Social Space. Sociology of Social Space,Saint Petersburg: Aleteya: 49-63. - In Russ.

2. Goffman E. (2017) Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings, M.: Elementary Forms Press. - In Russ.

3. Simmel G. (2015) Essay on the Stranger. Selected Works: The Problem of Sociology, M.: Universitetskaya kniga: 228-233. - In Rus.

4. Версия 12 (21.09.2021) (https://static-0.minzdrav.gov.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/058/075/original/BMP_COVID-19_V12.pdf).

5. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (2021) Interim Guidelines: Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of New Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19). Version 12 (21.09.2021) (https://static0.minzdrav.gov.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/058/075/original/BMP_COVID-19_V12.pdf). - In Russ.

6. Auriemma V., Iannaccone C. (2020) COVID-19 Pandemic: Socio-Economic Consequences of Social Distancing Measures in Italy. Frontiers in Sociology, 5: 575-791. EDN: URKUPD

7. Baker J. O., Marti G., Braunstein R., Whitehead A. L., Yukich G. (2020) Religion in the Age of Social Distancing: How COVID-19 Presents New Directions for Research. Sociology of Religion, 81(4): 357-370. EDN: PMKQPJ

8. Basaure M, Joignant A, Mascareno A. (2021) Between Distancing and Interdependence: The Conflict of Solidarities in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sociological Perspectives, 64(5): 706-725. EDN: HODBQG

9. Collins R. (2020) Social Distancing as a Critical Test of the Micro-sociology of Solidarity. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 8(3): 477-497.

10. Cozza M., Gherardi S., Graziano V., Johansson J., Mondon-Navazo M., Murgia A., Trogal K. (2021) COVID-19 as a Breakdown in the Texture of Social Practices. Gender, Work and Organization, 28(S1): 190-208. EDN: OADQQQ

11. Davy B. (2021) Social Distancing and Cultural Bias. Journal of the American Planning Association, 87(2): 159-166. EDN: WEKLUE

12. Goffman E. (1971) Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order, New York: Basic Books.

13. Hoeben E. M., Bernasco W., Suonpera Liebst L., van Baak C., Rosenkrantz Lindegaard M. (2021) Social Distancing Compliance: A Video Observational Analysis. PLoS ONE, 16(3): e0248221. EDN: DXRMGO

14. Katila J., Gan Y., Goodwin M. H. (2020) Interaction Rituals and "Social Distancing": New Haptic Trajectories and Touching from a Distance in the Time of COVID-19. Discourse Studies, 22(4): 418-440. EDN: IZLAFJ

15. Kozlowski L. T., Kiviniemi M. T., Ram P. K. (2010) Easier Said Than Done: Behavioral Conflicts in Following Social-Distancing Recommendations for Influenza Prevention. Public Health Reports, 125(6): 789-792.

16. Laurier E., Hamann M., Albert S., Stokoe E. (2020) Walking in the Time of COVID-19 (https://rolsi.net/2020/05/05/guest-blog-walking-in-the-time-of-covid-19).

17. Lopez D. G. (2021) A Phenomenological Approach to the Study of Social Distance. Human Studies, 44(2): 171-200.

18. Mohler G., Bertozzi A. L., Carter J., Short M. B., Sledge D., Tita G. E., Uchidaf C. D., Brantingham P. J. (2020) Impact of Social Distancing during COVID-19 Pandemic on Crime in Los Angeles and Indianapolis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 68(May-June): 101-692.

19. Mondada L., Banninger J., Bouaouina S. A., Gauthier G., Hanggi P., Koda M., Svensson H., Tekin B. S. (2020a) Doing Paying during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Discourse Studies, 22(6): 720-752. EDN: UUFBTA

20. Mondada L., Banninger J., Bouaouina S. A., Camus L., Gauthier G., Hanggi Ph., Koda M., Svensson H., Tekin B. S. (2020b) Human Sociality in the Times of the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Examination of Change in Greetings. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 24(4): 441-468. EDN: EPCSGD

21. Morrow J. (2020) Alone Together: Finding Solidarity in a Time of Social Distance. Space and Culture, 23(3): 315-319.

22. Nerlich B., Jaspal R. (2021) Social Representations of "Social Distancing" in Response to COVID-19 in the UK Media. Current Sociology, 69(4): 566-583. EDN: JWVGRW

23. Pfalle, L. (2020) Theorizing the Virus: Abjection and the COVID-19 Pandemic.International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(9/10): 821-829. EDN: RXNXOW

24. Romania V. (2020) Interactional Anomie? Imaging Social Distance after COVID-19: A Goffmanian Perspective. Sociologica, 14(1): 51-66.

25. Scherlis L. (2020) Distantiated Communities: A Social History of Social Distancing (https://www.cabinetmagazine.org/kiosk/scherlis_lily_30_april_2020.php).

26. Voicu B., Peral E. B., Rusu H., Rosta G., Com§a M., Vasile O.-M., Coromina L., Tufis C. (2021) COVID-19 and Orientations towards Solidarity: The Cases of Spain, Hungary, and Romania. European Societies, 23(S1): S887-S904. EDN: SBNIBM