Political Agency of Children in the New Sociology of Childhood and Beyond
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2023-4-8-20
Abstract
The article is a review of theoretical discussions about children’s agency in the new sociology of childhood, on the one hand, and a review of empirical studies of children’s political agency, on the other. These two fields often discuss the same problem, but look at it from different perspectives. Childhood theorists debate what children’s agency is and whether the search for it should be critical. Some of them continue to postulate the need to consider children as social actors, while others criticize this position for its ahistorical nature, normative charge, and simplified understanding of agency and subjectivity. Empirical researchers of children’s political participation are not too concerned with the conceptualization of the very concept of agency, but the materials of their research allow us to understand how children themselves in different situations discursively construct their agency — as more progressive than that of an adult; as no different from an adult; as interconnected with an adult; or even as inferior to an adult. Children do not deprive themselves of agency out of nowhere; such deprivation can be explained by both class factors and factors associated with the characteristics of socialization. Thus, studies of children’s political participation strengthen the grounds for criticizing the “naive” attitude to seek children’s political agency a priori, but at the same time they call into question the possibility of one, “correct” definition of children’s (political) agency. The review of discussions and findings in both areas ends with a formulation of problems and questions that childhood researchers, including Russian ones, have yet to resolve.
About the Author
S. ErpylevaGermany
Svetlana Erpyleva — PhD in Social Science from the University of Helsinki; a researcher with Public Sociology Laboratory and a post-doctoral researcher at Research Centre for East European Studies, University of Bremen.
Bremen
References
1. Dimke D. (2021) An unforgettable future. Soviet pedagogical utopia of the 1960s. M.: Common Place. — in Russ.
2. Kazakov E. (2010) Managing yourself. West German schoolchildren’s home rule movement, 1960s. Neprikosnovennyi Zapas, 72(4): 104–15. — in Russ.
3. Serebryakov A. (2022) The child in the world of agents and structures: on the antinomies of childhood research. Sociology ofPower, 34(3-4): 29–49. doi: 10.22394/2074-0492-2022-4-29-49 — in Russ.
4. Alanen L. (1992) Modern Childhood?: Exploring the Child Question in Sociology. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
5. Baader M. (2016) Tracing and contextualising childhood agency and generational order from historical and systematic perspectives. In Esser F., Baader M., Betz T., and Hungerland B. (eds.). Reconceptualising agency and childhood. New perspectives in Childhood Studies. London and New York: Routledge. Р. 177–195.
6. Bartlett S. (2005) Good Governance: Making Age Part of the Equation — An Introduction. Children, Youth and Environments, 15(2): 1–17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.15.2.0001
7. Bordonaro L. and Payne R. (2012) Ambiguous agency: critical perspectives on social interventions with children and youth in Africa. Children’s Geographies, 10(4): 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2012.726065
8. Coffey J. and Farrugia D. (2014) Unpacking the black box: the problem of agency in the sociology of youth. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(4): 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.830707
9. De Castro L. R. (2012) The “Good-Enough Society”, the “Good-Enough Citizen” and the “Good-Enough Student”: Where Is Children’s Participation Agenda Moving To in Brazil? Childhood, 19(1): 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568211402525
10. Darıcı H. (2013) “Adults See Politics as a Game”: Politics of Kurdish Children in Urban Turkey. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 45: 775–790. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743813000901
11. Eliasoph N. (2011) Making Volunteers: Civic Life after Welfare’s End. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Erpyleva S. (2020) Children changing politics. Baltic Rim Econmies. February 28. Available at https://sites.utu.fi/bre/children-changing-politics/
13. Erpyleva S. (2021) Active Citizens Under Eighteen: Minors in Political Protests. Journal of Youth Studies, 24(9): 1215–1233. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1820973
14. Esser F., Baader M., Betz T., and Hungerland B. (2016) Reconceptualising agency and childhood. An introduction. In Esser F., Baader M., Betz T., and Hungerland B. (eds.). Reconceptualising agency and childhood. New perspectives in Childhood Studies. London and New York: Routledge.
15. Glaser А. (2018) The Liberation of Young People. Ph.D. thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
16. Gordon H. (2010) We Fight to Win. Inequality and the Politics of Youth Activism. New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Rutgers University Press.
17. Han H. and Ahn S. W. (2020) Youth Mobilization to Stop Global Climate Change: Narratives and Impact. Sustainability, 12(10): 4127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104127
18. Holmberg A. and Alvinius A. (2020) Children’s Protest in Relation to the Climate Emergency: A Qualitative Study on a New Form of Resistance Promoting Political and Social Change. Childhood, 27(1): 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568219879970
19. James A. and James A. (eds.) (2012) Key Concepts in Childhood Studies. Los Angeles, London: SAGE.
20. Lancy D. (2012) Unmasking Children’s Agency. AnthropoChildren, 1(2): 1–20. https://popups.uliege.be/2034-8517/index.php?id=1253.
21. Lister R. (2007) Why Citizenship: Where, When and How Children? Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 693–718. https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1165
22. Nance-Carroll N. (2021) Children and Young People as Activist Authors. International Research in Children’s Literature, 14(1): 6–21. https://doi.org/10.3366/ircl.2021.0374
23. Prout A. (2005) The Future of Childhood. Towards the interdisciplinary study of children. London and New York: Routledge.
24. Prout A. (2011) Taking a Step Away from Modernity: reconsidering the new sociology of childhood. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1): 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.4
25. Prout A., James A. (1997) A New Paradigm for the Sociology of Childhood? Provenance, Promise and Problems. In Prout A., James A. (eds.). Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. London, Washington (DC): Falmer Press. Р. 7–32.
26. Raithelhuber E. (2016) Extending agency: the merit of relational approach for Childhood studies. In: Esser F., Baader M., Betz T., and Hungerland B. (eds.). Reconceptualising agency and childhood. New perspectives in Childhood Studies. London and New York: Routledge. Р. 126–141.
27. Qvortrup J., Corsaro W., and Honig M. S. (2009) Why Social Studies of Childhood? An Introduction to the Handbook. In: Qvortrup J., Corsaro W., and Honig M. S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Childhood Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Р. 1–17.
28. Taft J. (2011) Rebel Girls. Youth Activism and Social Change Across the Americas. New York and London: NYU Press.
29. Taft J. (2019) The Kids Are in Charge. Activism and Power in Peru’s Movement of Working Children. New York: NYU Press.
30. Tisdall K. and Punch S. (2012) Not So “New”? Looking Critically at Childhood Studies. Children’s Geographies, 10 (3): 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2012.693376
Review
For citations:
Erpyleva S. Political Agency of Children in the New Sociology of Childhood and Beyond. Sociology of Power. 2023;35(4):8-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2023-4-8-20