The Demand for Stability and Generational Differences in Perceptions of Happiness in Russia
EDN: MPJBOM
Abstract
The article focuses on the study of perceptions of happiness among 4 generations of Russians. It also considers the differences in their “request for stability”, voiced while discussing the role of the state and social institutions in achieving happiness and planning the future. Based on 130 interviews, similarities and differences in the perceptions of happiness among representatives of different generations were revealed. The results obtained were interpreted through the lens of the AGIL functional theory of T. Parsons. It was revealed that the internal mechanisms of societal regulation (L and I), functioning in the institutions of family and culture, stably transmit values and sources of happiness — close relationships, family, and material well-being. At the same time, there is a similarity of requests in relation to the state — a request for social stability and peace. The results of the analysis of external mechanisms of societal regulation (A, G), functioning within the framework of economic and political institutions, reveal contradictions in the expressed means and goals of achieving happiness, as well as different expectations towards the state among 4 generations of Russians. Representatives of all generations formulate requests to the state aimed at ensuring the foundations of happiness, using the word “stability”. However, they interpret this concept in different ways: as maintaining a balance between social guarantees and non-interference in private “quiet” life (boomers); as a basis for legitimising their ideas about social justice (generation X); dissatisfaction with ongoing conflicts (millennials), decline in technological progress, and the limitation of their opportunities for self-realisation (zoomers). As a result, this conventional word allows different social groups and generations to legitimise their demands and expectations through external assent to a normative cultural attitude that is endowed with different socio-communicative meanings.
About the Author
N. V. ShalyutinaRussian Federation
Nadezhda V. Shalyutina — PhD in Sociology, Leading Researcher
Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Bruckner P. (2007) Perpetual Euphoria: On the Dutyto Be Happy. Saint Petersburg: Ivan Limbach Publishing House. (in Russ.)
2. Illouz E., Cabanas E. (2023) Manufacturing happy citizens. How the Science and Industry of Happiness Control our Lives. Moscow: AST. (in Russ.)
3. Inglehart R. (1997) Postmodernity: changing values and changing societies. Political Studies, 4, рр. 6‒32. (in Russ.)
4. Mannheim K. (2000) Essays on the sociology of knowledge: Generational problem — competitiveness — economic ambitions. Moscow: INION RAN. (in Russ.)
5. Parsons T. (2018) The social system. Moscow: Academic project. (in Russ.)
6. Sokolov M.M. (2019) Generations Instead of Classes? Age and the Consumer Revolution in Russia. Sociology of Power, 31 (1), рр. 71‒91.
7. Omelchenko E.L. (2024) Forgotten Generation X. A Retrospective Look from the Future. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 2 (16), рр. 10–28. (in Russ.)
8. Fathers and Children: A Generational Analysis of Modern Russia (2005) Ed. Y. Levada, T. Shanin. Moscow: New Literary Review. (in Russ.)
9. Radaev V.V. (2019) Millennials. How Russian societyischanging. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. (in Russ.)
10. Semenova V.V. (2009) Social dynamics of generations: problem and reality. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (in Russ.)
11. Certeau M. de. (2013) The Practice of Everyday Life. Saint Petersburg: Publishing house of the European University in St. Petersburg. (in Russ.)
12. Starikova A.A. (2019) To the question of the interrelation of public and subjective well-being in the economy of happiness (philosophical aspect). Management issues, 2 (57), рр. 66‒74. (in Russ.)
13. Yurchak A. Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation. Moscow: New Literary Review. (in Russ.)
14. Easterlin R.A. (1974) Doeseconomic growth improvethe human lot? Someempiricalevidence. Nations and Householdsin Economic Growth: Essaysin Honor of Moses Abramovitz. N.Y.: Academic Press, рр. 89‒125. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7
15. Jones B. J. (2024) The Pursuit of Happiness in America. A Sociological Perspective. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65607-1
16. Riley M.W. (1973) Aging and Cohort Succession: Interpretations and Misinterpretations. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 1 (37), рр. 35‒49. https://doi.org/10.1086/268058
17. Thaler R., Sunstein C. (2003) Libertarian Paternalism. The American Economic Review, 2 (93), рр. 175‒179. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321947001
Review
For citations:
Shalyutina N.V. The Demand for Stability and Generational Differences in Perceptions of Happiness in Russia. Sociology of Power. 2026;38(2):45-66. (In Russ.) EDN: MPJBOM
JATS XML







































