We Have Never Been Home
EDN: LQIECE
Abstract
In care research, the notion of “home” often emerges as a key concern, with its conceptualization shaping social policy priorities. This article critically examines the idea of “possessing” a home, which is framed in two main ways: as a physical space that can be inhabited, modified, lost, or reclaimed, and as a site imbued with symbolic or emotional meaning, domesticated through human engagement. Both perspectives tend to fixate on the moment a person becomes the “owner” of their version of home, often bringing discussions to an early close. The article argues that home is not a stable physical space offering ontological security or affective attachment, but rather the outcome of ongoing infrastructural and social transformations. It introduces the concept of “beyond-homeness”, shifting attentionenactments from of homethe home. This/homelessness framework accounts binary towardfor material multiple conditions, dynamic as well as memories, rituals, spatial practices, and forms of synchronization with others and with (non)material objects. By doing so, it exposes the limitations of interventions that reduce support for the homeless to housing provision alone and emphasizes the need to consider how home is continuously reassembled even after shelter is acquired.
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at HSE University.
About the Author
M. D. Malkov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maksim D. Malkov — MA in Sociology, guest lecturer at the, postgraduate Student, research intern at the International Laboratory for Social Integration Research, lecturer at MSSES (Moscow Higher School of Social and Economic Sciences)
Moscow
References
1. Abashin S. (2015) Returning home: Family and migration scenarios in Uzbekistan. Ab Imperio, 2015(3), pp. 125–165. (in Russ.)
2. Baibakova D. A., Garinova K. A. (2024) What is known about homelessness in Russia Russia’s Directions, 2(4), pp. 215–257. (in Russ.)
3. Bachelard G. (2014) The poetics of space. Ad Marginem. (in Russ.)
4. Brednikova O., Tkach O. (2010). Home for a nomad. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research, 2(3), pp. 72‒95. (in Russ.)
5. Bourdieu P. (2001) Practical reason (A. T. Bikbov, K. D. Voznesenskaya, S. N. Zenkin, & N. A. Shmatko, Trans.; N. A. Shmatko, Ed.). St. Petersburg: Aleteya. (in Russ.)
6. Bourdieu P. (2005) Sociology of social space (N. A. Shmatko, Ed.). St. Petersburg: Aleteya. (in Russ.)
7. Goffman E. (2000) The presentation of self in everyday life. Moscow: Kanon-press-C; Kuchkovo Pole. (in Russ.)
8. Gudkov K. M. (2024) Homelessness during Constructivism. Russia’s Directions, 2(4), pp. 155‒181. (in Russ.)
9. Dudenkova I. V. (2024) The poetics and politics of home. Russia’s Directions, 2(4), pp. 204–213. (in Russ.)
10. Kazakova A. Yu. (2020) The Housing First model in Western social policy of overcoming homelessness. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 18(2), pp. 357–367. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2020-18-2-357-367 (in Russ.)
11. Kolotilova T. V. (2024) The social topology of relocation: Homeomorphic and non-homeomorphic transformations of “home”. Russia’s Pathways, 2(4), pp. 183–203. (in Russ.)
12. Connell R. (2015) Gender and power: Society, the person and gender politics (T. Barchunova(in Russ.), Trans.; I. Tartakovskaya, Ed.). Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 129
13. Connell R., Tezina E., Kislenko I. (2023) Canons and colonies: The global trajectory of sociology. Russian Sociological Review, 22(3), pp. 219–236. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2023-3-219-236 (in Russ.)
14. Kurakin D. (2020) The tragedy of inequality: Dehumanizing the “total person”. Russian Sociological Review, 19(3), pp. 167–231. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728192x-2020-3-167-231 (in Russ.)
15. Levinas E. (2004) Humanism and anarchy. In E. Levinas, Selected works: Difficult freedom. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (in Russ.)
16. Mol A. (2017) The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice (Cube of Pink, Trans.; A. Pisarev, S. Gavrilenko, Eds.). Perm: Gile Press. (in Russ.)
17. Mosse G. (2023) The image of man: The creation of modern masculinity (N. Mazur, Trans.). St. Petersburg: European University Press. (in Russ.)
18. Steel C. (2014) Hungry city: How food shapes our lives (Trans. from English). Moscow: Strelka Press. (in Russ.)
19. Filippov A. (2009) Empty and full: Transformation of public space. Russian Sociological Review, 8(3), pp. 16–29. (in Russ.)
20. Shilova N. V. (2025) Housing stress: Definition and assessment in housing policy
21. development. Russia’s Directions, 3(2), pp. 102–111. (in Russ.)
22. Hui, Y. (2025) Post-Europe. Moscow: Ad Marginem. (in Russ.)
23. Ahmed S. (1999) Home and away: Narratives of migration and estrangement. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2(3), pp. 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/136787799900200303
24. Bieger L. (2015) No place like home; or, dwelling in narrative. New Literary History, 46(1), pp. 17–39.
25. Boccagni P., Duyvendak J. W. (2021) Homemaking in the public: On the scales and stakes of framing, feeling, and claiming extra-domestic space as “home.” Sociology Compass, 15(6), pp. 1‒14. e12886. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12886
26. Busch-Geertsema V. (2010) Defining and measuring homelessness. In Homelessness Research in Europe: Festschrift for Bill Edgar and Joe Doherty (pp. 19–39). FEANTSA.
27. Cheshire L., Easthope H., ten Have C. (2021) Unneighbourliness and the unmaking of home. Housing, Theory and Society, 38(2), pp. 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2019.1705384
28. Connell R. W. (1997) Why is classical theory classical? American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), pp. 1511–1557. https://doi.org/10.1086/231125
29. Cooren F. (2020) Beyond entanglement: (Socio-)materiality and organization studies. Organization Theory, 1(3). DOI:10.1177/2631787720954444
30. Dovey K. (1985) Home and homelessness. In I. Altman, C. M. Werner (Eds.), Home environments (pp. 33–64). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2266-3_2
31. Douglas M. (1991) The idea of a home: A kind of space. Social Research, 58(1), pp. 287–307. Handel A. (2019) What’s in a home? Toward a critical theory of housing/dwelling. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(6), pp. 1045–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418819104
32. Höjdestrand T. (2005) Needed by nobody: Homelessness and humanness in post-socialist Russia. Cornell University Press.
33. Kaika M. (2004) Interrogating the geographies of the familiar: Domesticating nature and constructing the autonomy of the modern home. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(2), pp. 265–286. DOI:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00519.x
34. Lancione M. (2023) For a liberatory politics of home. Duke University Press.
35. Langegger S., Koester S. (2016) Invisible homelessness: Anonymity, exposure, and the right to the city. Urban Geography, 37(7), pp. 1030–1048. DOI:10.1080/02723638.2016.1147755
36. Law J. (1993) Organising modernity: Social ordering and social theory. Wiley-Blackwell.
37. Law J. (2002) Objects and spaces. Theory, culture & society, 19(5-6), pp. 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327602761899165
38. Linton J. (2010) What is water?: The history of a modern abstraction. UBC Press. Mallett S. (2004) Understanding home: A critical review of the literature. The Sociological Review, 52(1), pp. 62–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00442.x
39. McCarthy L. (2020) Homeless women, material objects and home (un)making. Housing Studies, 35(7), pp. 1309–1331. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1659235
40. Meehan K. et al. (2023) Homelessness and water insecurity in the Global North: Trapped in the dwelling paradox. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 10(4), pp. 1‒11, e1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1651
41. Mol A. (2008) The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge.
42. Navaro-Yashin Y. (2009) Affective spaces, melancholic objects: Ruination and the 131 production of anthropological knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 15(1), pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.01527.x
43. Neimanis A. (2017) Bodies of water: Posthuman feminist phenomenology. Bloomsbury Academic.
44. Noddings N. (2002) Caring, social policy, and homelessness. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 23(5), pp. 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021385717732
45. Price J. M. (2002) The apotheosis of home and the maintenance of spaces of violence. Hypatia, 17(4), pp. 39–70. https://doi.org/10.2979/HYP.2002.17.4.39
46. Samanani F., Lenhard J. (2019) House and home. In F. Stein, S. Lazar, M. Candea, H. Diemberger, J. Robbins, A. Sanchez et al. (Eds.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.29164/19home
47. Schneider L. T. (2022) “My home is my people” homemaking among rough sleepers in Leipzig, Germany. Housing Studies, 37(2), pp. 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1844157
48. Smith R. J., Hall T. (2018) Everyday territories: Homelessness, outreach work and city space. The British Journal of Sociology, 69(2), pp. 372–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/14684446.12280
49. Somerville P. et al. (1992) Homelessness and the meaning of home: Rooflessness or rootlessness? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16(4), pp. 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1992.tb00194.x
50. Stephens E. (2014) Feminism and new materialism: The matter of fluidity. InterAlia: Pismo poświęcone studiom queer, (9), pp. 186‒202. https://doi.org/10.51897/interalia/BOSZ9092
51. Sultana F. (2009) Fluid lives: Subjectivities, gender and water in rural Bangladesh. Gender, Place & Culture, 16(4), pp. 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690903003942
52. Woodhall-Melnik J. R., Dunn J. R. (2016) A systematic review of outcomes associated with participation in Housing First programs. Housing Studies, 31(3), pp. 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2015.1080816
Review
For citations:
Malkov M.D. We Have Never Been Home. Sociology of Power. 2026;38(1):107-132. (In Russ.) EDN: LQIECE
Views:
224
JATS XML
Email this article 