This Is Not Allowed in the Mountains: The Multiplicity of Normative Systems in North Ossetia
EDN: YNBDXY
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to identify the elements and characteristics of the interaction of Brian Tamanaha’s normative systems for a more detailed analysis of the intersection of social orders.
The research uses interviews collected during two expeditions to North Ossetia. Based on the results of coding interviews collected by the authors in August 2023 and October 2024, the authors identified elements and patterns of interaction between normative systems. These systems include elements such as the declared norms, their sources, institutions for the implementation of norms, attitudes towards them, and the procedure for their implementation in practice. Many elements occur in several systems at the same time, intersect with each other, creating a complex network of regulatory systems. The boundaries between regulatory systems can be strict and lax. In the first case, there is a clear understanding that a specific normative system is applied in a certain situation and no other. If the boundaries are not strict, it is possible to refer to two or more regulatory systems. Even strict boundaries between regulatory systems are dynamic and can change over time and depending on the subject of their application. In places where regulatory systems intersect or have strict boundaries, various forms of their interaction are possible. The institution of implementing the norms of one system can comply with the norms of another, even if these norms are in conflict. Or, on the contrary, institutions of different regulatory systems may compete for the right to implement their own norms.
About the Authors
P. M. Osipova
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Polina M. Osipova, Junior Researcher Fellow
Sports Research Laboratory
Moscow
Research interests: common knowledge of law, law mobilization, sociology of sports
V. D. Churakov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir D. Churakov, Candidate of Sciences (PhD) in Law, Research Fellow
Faculty of Law; Institute of National and Comparative Legal Studies
Moscow
Research interests: Law&Economics, efficiency of legal regulation, regulatory politics, sociology of law
S. V. Vinogradov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Vinogradov, Lecturer, Research Assistant
School of Theory of Law and Comparative Law; Centre for Basic Research; Laboratory for Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Projects
Moscow
Research interests: history of 20th century political and legal thought, analytical philosophy of law, contemporary theories of justice
O. D. Pyrsikov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg D. Pyrsikov, master’s student “Politics. Economy. Philosophy”
Faculty of Social Sciences
Moscow
References
1. Varshaver E., Kruglova E. (2015) The “Coalition Clinch” Against the Islamic Order: the Dynamics of the Dispute Resolution Institutions Market in Dagestan. Economic Policy, 10(3), pp. 89–112. (in Russ.) doi: 10.18288/1994-5124-2015-3-05
2. Galanter M. (2014) Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law (pp. 391–423). In Paneyakh E. L. (Ed.), Law and law enforcement in the mirror of social sciences : The handbook of recent texts. Statut. (in Russ.)
3. Dzanagova M. K., Beteeva M. M., Khadikov A. K. (2018) Functions and Role of Nykhas in Ossetian Society. Agrarian and Land Law, (2), pp. 85–88. (in Russ.)
4. Kazenin, K. (2017) Islamic Law in A Situation of Competition of Legal Systems: the Case of the North Caucasus. State, Religion, and the Church in Russia and Abroad, 35(3), pp. 234–264. (in Russ.) doi: 10.22394/2073-7203-2017-35-3-234-264
5. Kazenin K. (2014) Prospects of an Institutional Approach to the Phenomenon of Polyjuridism (On The Example Of The North Caucasus). Economic Policy, 9(3), pp. 178–198. (in Russ.)
6. Kazenin K. I. (2016) Conflict Resolution in the North Caucasus: the Role of Informal Legal Mechanisms. Social Sciences and Modernity, (2), pp. 144–154. (in Russ.)
7. Kanukova Z. V., Kulumbekov R. P. (2015) Ossetian Khaedzar as a Model of Reproduction and Functioning of Traditions in Modern Society. Izvestiya SOIGSI, 16(55), pp. 65–72. (in Russ.)
8. Malinowski B. (2015) Crime and Custom in Savage Society (pp. 209–282). In Malinowski, B. Selected works: Dynamics of culture. Centre for Humanitarian Initiatives. (in Russ.)
9. Starodubrovskaya I. V., Kazenin K. I. (2014) North Caucasian Cities: the Territory of Conflicts. Social Sciences and Modernity, (6), pp. 70–82. (in Russ.)
10. Tamanaha B. Z. (2014) Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global (pp. 145–184). In Paneyakh E. L. (Ed.), Law and law enforcement in the mirror of social sciences : The handbook of recent texts. Statut. (in Russ.)
11. Tuallagov A. A. (2022) To the History of Nykhas. Vestnik of Vladikavkaz Scientific Centre, 22(1), pp. 14–16. (in Russ.) doi: 10.46698/VNC.2022.98.11.001
12. Tuallagov A. A. (2023) To the History of Nykhas (II). Vestnik of Vladikavkaz Scientific Centre, 23(1), pp. 20–23. (in Russ.) doi: 10.46698/VNC.2023.33.84.001
13. Сhetvernin V. A. (2020) Problems of the Theory of Law [Electronic resource]. Laboratory of Theoretical Studies of Law and State. URL: https://pravo.hse.ru/data/2020/03/24/1567458184/%D0%A7%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BD%20%D0%92.%D0%90.%20%D0%A2%D0%B5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F%20%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0.pdf (in Russ.)
14. Shtyrkov S. A. (2022) The Iron Khadzar as an Element of Social Infrastructure in a Modern North Ossetian City. Anthropological Forum, (55), pp. 195–220. (in Russ.) doi: 10.31250/1815-8870-2022-18-55-195-220
15. Ehrlich E. (2024) Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Alef-Press. (in Russ.)
16. Bentsi-Enchill K. (1969) The Colonial Heritage of Legal Pluralism. Zambia Law Journal, 1(2), рр. 1–30.
17. Chua L. J., Engel D. M. (2019) Legal Consciousness Reconsidered. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15, рр. 335–353. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042717
18. Gluckman M. (1967) The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester University Press.
19. Griffiths J. (1986) What is Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), рр. 1–55. doi: 10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
20. Griffiths J. (2006) The Idea of Sociology of Law and its Relation to Law and to Sociology (pp. 49–68). In Freeman M. (Ed.), Law and sociology. Oxford University Press.
21. Hoebel E. A. (1954) The Law of Primitive Man: a Study in Comparative Legal Dynamics. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4159/9780674038707.
22. Hooker M. B. (1975) Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-Colonial Laws. Clarendon Press. doi: 10.5771/0506-7286-1976-3-400
23. Lazarev E. (2018) Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya. Columbia University.
24. Lazarev E. (2023) State-building as Lawfare: Custom, Sharia, and State law in Postwar Chechnya. Cambridge University Press.
25. Merry S. E. (1986) Everyday Understandings of the Law in Working-Class America. American Ethnologist, 13(2), рр. 253–270.
26. Merry S. E. (1988) Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), рр. 869–896.
27. Moore S. F. (1973) Law and Social Change: the Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study. Law and Society Review, 7(4), рр. 719–746. doi: 10.25148/lawrev.10.1.5
28. Moore S. F. (2014) Legal Pluralism as Omnium Gatherum. FIU Law Review, 10(1), рр. 5–18.
29. Pospisil L. (1967) Legal Levels and Multiplicity of Legal Systems in Human Societies.
30. Romano S. (2018). The Legal Order. Routledge.
31. Smith M. G. (1966). A Structural Approach to Comparative Politics (pp. 113–128). In Easton D. (Ed.), Varieties of Political Theory. Prentice-Hall.
32. Tamanaha B. Z. (2021). Legal Pluralism Explained: History, Theory, Consequences. Oxford University Press.
33. Tamanaha B. Z. (2024). Ubiquity of Legal Pluralism and its Consequences. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 54(4), pp. 895–918.
Review
For citations:
Osipova P.M., Churakov V.D., Vinogradov S.V., Pyrsikov O.D. This Is Not Allowed in the Mountains: The Multiplicity of Normative Systems in North Ossetia. Sociology of Power. 2025;37(4):215-248. (In Russ.) EDN: YNBDXY
Views:
43
Email this article 