How to look at “The City of the Peaceful Atom” from the Perspective of the Social Network? Or: In Search of Lost Modernity
EDN: YMCUQH
Abstract
On content, this article combines visual studies and digital ethnography of vision in order to investigate the local ways of seeing practiced by the participants of the Retro Obninsk network community when looking at old photos of the "city of the peaceful atom”. In terms of epistemology, the article captures the digital shifts in the work of a social researcher when using qualitative approaches: the need for joint distributed work, accumulation and analysis of enlarged data, saturation of qualitative research with data, increased sensitivity to the analytical use of zoom and scaling, interest in patterns, etc. The text consists of three parts. The first part describes an experimental design of a qualitative research training aimed at discovering the joint discursive and visual production of retro optics for Obninsk, emphasizing the importance of infrastructure for the organization of distributed digital research and problematizing the qualitative work with patterns. In the second part - centered around the logic of "zooming out” - Retro Obninsk is characterized by its specificity against the background of other retro-cities existing on the VKontakte platform, as an open hyperspectacular community. In the third part - centered around the logic of "zooming in” - the article explicates the optical patterns of Retro Obninsk from the collected data. These patterns include: bringing the lower boundary of the "retro” into chronological correspondence with the end of the Soviet period and searching for its visible markers; a preference for authentic "seeing something as something” over "seeing in comparison”, eliminating the discovery and discussion of affinity in the architecture of Soviet nuclear cities; a detailing view that protects an observer against immersion in the local nuclear history; the technological appropriation of "retro” and its adaptation to actual visual standards; a fascination with panorama-perspectives and a longing for the (nuclear) modernity embodied in the urban form.
About the Author
Galina A. Orlova
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Associate Professor at the Social Psychology Department
References
1. Abramov R. (2011) “Sovetskij cherdak” rossijskoj blogosfery: analiz nostal’gicheskih virtual’nyh soobshchestv [The Soviet Loft of the Russian Blogosphere: An Analysis of Nostalgic Virtual Communities]. INTER, 1(6): 88-102.
2. Baran K., Stock W. (2015) Facebook has been smacked down. The Russian special way of SNSs: VKontakte as a case study. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Social Media (ECSM 2015), 9 (10).
3. Bennett T. (2013) The birth of the museum: History, theory, politics. Routledge.Boyer M. (1996) The city of collective memory: its historical imagery and architectural entertainments, MIT Press.
4. Brown D. (2002) Going Digital and Staying Qualitative: Some Alternative Strategies for Digitizing the Qualitative Research Process. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3 (2) (http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0202122).
5. Burdick A., Drucker J. et all (2012) Digital Humanities, MIT Press.
6. Cohen D., Scheinfeldt J. (2013) Hacking the academy: New approaches to scholarship and teaching from digital humanities, University of Michigan Press.
7. Crary J. (1992) Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the XIX century, MIT
8. Press.
9. Elkins J. (2007) How to use your eyes, Routledge.
10. Goodwin Ch. (1994) Professional vision. American anthropologist, 96 (3): 606-633.
11. Hampton K., Wellman B. (2003) Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City and Community, 2 (4): 277-311.
12. Kasatkina A. (2017) VKontakte” s istoriej: istoricheskaya kul’tura souchastiya v gruppe “Retro Obninsk”. [VКontakte with history: historical culture of participation in Retro Obnisk], Elektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel’nyj zhurnal Istoriya, (7). Kasatkina A. (2016) Na puti k otkrytym kachestvennym dannym [Towards open qualitative data]. EHlektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel’nyj zhurnal Istoriya, (7).
13. Kasatkina A. (2017) Kul’turnoe nasledie, internet mnozhestvo i perspektivy DH [Cultural Heritage, Internet-multitude and perspectives of Digital Humanities]. Topos,(1-2): 280–293.
14. Kelty C. (2009) Collaboration, Coordination, and Composition: Fieldwork after the Internet. Faubion J. D., Marcus G. E. (eds). Fieldwork is not what it used to be: Learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition, Cornell University Press: 184-206.
15. Kepes G. (1958) The new landscape in art and science? Paul Theobald and Co.
16. Manovich L. (2013) Software takes command? A&C Black.
17. McTavish L. (2006) Learning to see in New Brunswick, 1862–1929. Canadian historical review, 87 (3): 553–581.
18. Mirzoeff N. (1999) An Introduction to Visual Culture? Psychology Press.
19. Mitchell T. (2002) Showing seeing: a critique of visual culture. Journal of visual culture, 1 (2): 165-181.
20. Moretti F. (2016) Dal’nee chtenie [Distant Reading]. per. s angl. A. Vdovina, O. Sobchuka, A. SHeli, M.: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara.
21. Moyle M., Tonra J., Wallace V. (2011) Manuscript transcription by crowdsourcing: Transcribe Bentham. Liber Quarterly, 20 (3/4): 347-356.
22. Orlova G. (2016) Sobiraya proekt [Assembling the Project]. Shagi/Steps, 3(1): 154–166.
23. Orlova G. (2016a) So-avtorizaciya, no ne soavtorstvo: priklyucheniya transkripta v cifrovuyu ehpohu [Co-authorization but not co-authorship: adventures of the transcript during the Digital age]. Shagi/Steps, 3 (1): 200-223.
24. Orlova G. (2016b) Vizualizirovat’ media: Lev Manovich mezhdu perevodom i vtorichnym kartirovaniem [To visualize media: between translation and remapping]. Praktiki i interpretacii, 1 (3): 45–63.
25. Orlova G. (2016v) E-Oksyumoron: digital’noe kak kachestvennoe [E-oxymoron: the digital as the qualitative]. EHlektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel’nyj zhurnal Istoriya, (7): 137–164.
26. Orlova G. (2017) Kurirovanie kak predchuvstvie: o cifrovoj interpellyacii gumanitariya [Curation as anticipation: on digital interpellation of the humanist]. Topos, (1-2): 93–111.
27. Orlova G. (2018) Vremya zummirovat’: cifrovoe chtenie v poiskah masshtaba [Time to zoom in and zoom out: digital reading in search of the scale]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, (2).
28. Orlova G., Kasatkina A. (2017) Wide open qualitative data: the Obninsk digital project as an ethical dispositive. Russian Journal of Communication, (3): 328-335.
29. Popova K. (2017) Issledovaniya vizual’nogo v ehtnometodologii [Discovering the visual in ethnomethodology]. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, 16 (3): 212-232.
30. Presner T. et al. (2009) The digital humanities manifesto 2.0. UCLA Mellon Seminar in Digital Humanities (http://www. humanitiesblast. com/manifesto/Manifesto_V. 2).
31. Samostienko E. (2017) Digital iconoclasm and the new challenges of cognitive ethics: the case of web project Fiber. Russian Journal of Communication, 9 (3): 268-277.
32. Tifentale A. (2017) Rules of the Photographers’ Universe. Photoresearcher, 27 (4): 68-77.
33. Urry J. (2002) The Tourist Gaze, Sage.
34. VNIPIET: gody svershenij (2007) [VNIPIET: the years of accomplishment]. avt.-sost. K. Rendel’, SPb.
35. White S., McAllister I. (2014) Did Russia (nearly) have a Facebook revolution in 2011? Social media’s challenge to authoritarianism. Politics, 34(1): 72-84.
36. Wittgenstejn L. (2011) Filosofskie issledovaniya [Philosophical Investigations], M.: AST
Review
For citations:
Orlova G.A. How to look at “The City of the Peaceful Atom” from the Perspective of the Social Network? Or: In Search of Lost Modernity. Sociology of Power. 2018;30(3):93-126. (In Russ.) EDN: YMCUQH
Views:
1
Email this article 