Happiness for All: A Forgotten Concept or a New Foundation of Social Order?
EDN: RVINIS
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of happiness as a category of social theory, which—at the beginning of the XXI century—became not only a new subject of sociological research but also the basis of government programs in several countries, including the United Kingdom. “Happiness” became the basis of social order due to a revival of the interest of modern scholars in the works of Jeremy Bentham and other philosophers of the Enlightenment. In these works were considered, among other things, the possibilities of achieving universal happiness. However, the real reason for the actualization of this category is its crisis in economic science caused by the “Easterlin paradox,” that is, the absence of a direct and unequivocal correlation between income growth and the level of happiness of the population. The article provides a detailed analysis of the sources of the concept of happiness as a category of social order, primarily the work of the cameralists and Johann Heinrich Gottlieb Justi, the most famous representative of this school. The analysis demonstrates that the idea of happiness as the basis of social order has already been experienced in the period of cameralism when it was integrated into the work of the enlighteners. However, without further development, this idea eventually left the language of social sciences completely immersed in economic theory. One of the reasons for the decline of this category was the lack of “stable” mechanisms for including the happiness of individuals as a part of the common good, and therefore the impossibility of converting “happiness” from an existential into a social category. We provide an analysis of the reasons why none of the proposed theories of common happiness in the XVIII-XIX centuries was consistent. Even before the Enlightenment, the category survived the crisis in social theory and a return to it requires a serious rethinking in the context of the heritage of philosophers of the XVIII-XIX centuries.
About the Authors
Ольга ГончароваRussian Federation
Olga O. Goncharova
Russian Federation
MA in Sociology, independent researcher
References
1. Zhuchkov V.A. (1989) German Philosophy of the Early Enlightenment, Moscow: Science.—in Russ.
2. Kant I. (1965) Groundwork (or Foundations) of the Metaphysics of Morals. Kant I. SelectedWorks, M.: Mysl. Vol. 1(1): 211-310.—in Russ.
3. Kojeve A. (2003) Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, SPb.: Nauka.—in Russ.
4. Leibniz G.W. (1982a) Experiments of the theodicy. Leibniz G.W. Works in four volumes. IV, Moscow: ‘Thought’ of the USSR Academy of Sciences: 49-300.— in Russ.
5. Leibniz G.W. (1982b) Monadology. Leibniz G.W. Works in four volumes, 1, Moscow: ‘Thought’ of the USSR Academy of Sciences: 413-430.—in Russ.
6. Layard R. (2012) Happiness: Lessons from a New Science, translation. I. Kushnarev.— Moscow: Gaidar Institute.—in Russ.
7. Montesquieu С. The Spirit of the Laws, M.: Mysl.—in Russ.
8. Smith A. (2016) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Moscow: Eksmo.—in Russ.
9. Smith A. (1997) The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Moscow: Republic.—in Russ.
10. Fukuyama F. (2007) The End of History and the Last Man, M.: AST.—in Russ.
11. Justi J. (1777) The foundation of the power and welfare of the kingdoms, or a detailed outline of all knowledge relating to state deanery. St. Petersburg: Imperial academy of sciences.—in Russ.
12. Justi J. (1770) An essential image of the nature of popular societies and all kinds of laws, composed by Justi, Moscow: Imperial Moscow University.—in Russ.
13. Adam U. (2009) Justi and the Post-Montesquieu French debate on Commercial Nobility in 1756 The beginnings of political economy. N.-Y.: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC: 75-99.
14. Adam U. (2009) Justi and the Post-Montesquieu French debate on Commercial Nobility in 1756 The beginnings of political economy. N.-Y.: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC: 75-99.
15. Backhaus J.G. (2009) From Wolff to Justi. The beginnings of political economy. Springer Science+Business Media.
16. Baloglou C.P. (2012) Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832). Handbook of the history of economic thought. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC: 279-299.
17. Beccaria C. (1995) On crimes and punishments and other writings. Cambridge texts in the history of the political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Becker H. (2011) Justi’s Concrete Utopia.//The state as utopia. Continental approaches. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC: 41-57.
19. Bentham J. (2000) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
20. Bentham J. (1962) Constitutional Code. The Works of Jeremy Bentham, published under the superintendence of his executor John Bowring, IX. Edinburg. William Tait: 86-94.
21. Bentham J. (1891) Fragment on Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Burns J.H. Happiness and Utility: Jeremy Bentham’s Equation. University College London. URL: <https://www.utilitarianism.com/jeremy-bentham/greatest-happiness.pdf>
22. Easterlin R. (1972) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. University of Pennsylvania.
23. Fraiser D. (2001) Frederick the Great. First Fromm International Edition. London: Penguin Books.
24. Frambach H. (2009) Cameralism and Labour in von Justi’s Economic Thinking. The beginnings of political economy. N.-Y.: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC: 133-147
25. Frambach H. (2011) Cameralism and Physiocracy as the Two Sides of a Coin: Example of the Economic Policy of Johann Friedrich von Pfeiffer. Physiocracy, Antiphysiocracy and Pfeiffer. N.-Y.: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC: 97-115.
26. Frambach H. (2007) The decline of cameralism in Germany at the turn of the nineteenth century. Cameralism in practice. State Administration and economy in early modern Europe. The Boydell press, 10: 239-263.
27. Frederick de Grosse, king of Prussia (2015) Anti-Machiavel. A discourse upon the Means of Well Governing. URL: <https://archive.org/details/AntiMachiavelFriedericktheGreat>
28. Helvetius C. (2015) De l’Esprit: or, Essays on the mind, and its several faculties. Mr. Dodley and Co. in Pall-Mall.
29. Henderson J., Davis B.J. (1991) Adam Smith’s Influence on Hegel’s Philosophical Writings. URL: <http://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1282&context=econ_fac>
30. Horowitz I.L. (1954) Claude Helvetius: philosopher of democracy and enlightenment. N.-Y.: Pain-Whitman publishers.
31. Humboldt W. (1969) The limits of state action. Cambridge at the university press.
32. Leeuwen W.J. (2016) The sources of Glückseligkeit. Cameralists and the public debate at the Kameral. Utrecht: Utrecht University: 2-30.
33. Magnusson L. (2007) Comparing cameralisms: The case of Sweden and Prussia. Cameralism in practice. State Administration and economy in early modern Europe, 10 Woodbridge: The Boydell Press: 17-39.
34. Michalski R.M. (2009) Creon’s Secretaries: Theories of Bureaucracy and social order in 18th and early 19th century Prussia. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.
35. Montague F.C. (1891) Introduction. Fragment on Government. At the Clarendon Press: 5-90.
36. Peukert H. (2009) Justi’s Concept of Moral Economics and the Good Society. The beginnings of political economy. N.-Y.: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC: 117-133
37. Reinert E. (2009) Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi — The Life and Timesof an Economist Adventurer. The beginnings of political economy. N.-Y.: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC: 33-75.
38. Reinert S.A (2011) Translating Empire. Emulations and the origins of political economy. Harvard university press.
39. Seppel M. (2007) Cameralism in practice. Cameralism in practice. State Administration and economy in early modern Europe, 10 Woodbridge: The Boydell Press: 1-17.
40. Small A.W. (2001) The Cameralists. The pioneers of German Social Polity. Batoche Books Kitchener.
41. Spicer M. (1998) Cameralist thought and public administration. P.Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University, Cleveland.
42. Taylor M. (2010) Twenty-first century enlightenment. RSA.
43. Tribe K. (2007) Concluding remarks. Cameralism in practice. State Administration and economy in early modern Europe, 10 Woodbridge: The Boydell Press: 263-269.
44. Wagner R.E. (2012) Cameralists: Fertile Sources for a New Science of Public Finance. Handbook of the history of economic thought. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC: 123-137.
45. Wakefield A. (2012) Books, Bureaus, and the Historiography of Cameralism. European Journal of Law and Economics, 19 N.-Y.: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC: 311- 319
46. Wakefield A. (2009) The disordered police state. German cameralism as science and practice. The University of Chicago press.
Review
For citations:
, Goncharova O.O. Happiness for All: A Forgotten Concept or a New Foundation of Social Order? Sociology of Power. 2019;31(4):185-209. (In Russ.) EDN: RVINIS
Views:
1
Email this article 