Preview

Социология власти

Расширенный поиск

Neurobiology and the Good: Is It Possible to Make a Person Moral?

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-2-87-103

EDN: OQGNBT

Аннотация

With the discovery of the possibility of neurobiologically and genetically interpreting the actions of a moral agent, the issue of the status of morality returned to applied ethics with renewed vigor. The biotechnological understanding of society as a whole has been a long-running trend in technoscience and can be considered as a transgression of (bio-) technologies into the sphere of ethics. The essence of the conflict between bio-conservative ethics and techno-oriented utilitarians lies in the plane of violation of the fundamental value of autonomy (J. Harris) and the destruction of the principle of solidarity and equality (A. Buchanan). Supporters of techno-determined moral action as conditions for the expansion of technology into the field of morality put forward the predictability of consequences as a condition for the legitimation of technology (N. Agar), the need to prevent maximum harm (J. Savulescu, I. Persson) and the right to an autonomous choice of a biotechnological regulation of morality (V. Rakic). At the center of the discussion is the problem of the good, for the practical solution of which moral outsourcing mechanisms have already been envisaged (e.g. the service of triage officers in disaster medicine, extended informed consent for biobanks). The article compares moral action as a choice, moral action as a coercion and moral action as outsourcing, and determines the place of the neurobiological interpretation of good and moral action within the theoretical understanding of a moral act in applied ethics. In particular, the role of a cognitive act in the context of a moral act is examined, the problem of deferred risks and their regulation when making a moral decision is analyzed. It is concluded that one of the manifestations of the impact of (bio) technology on a person is the complicacy and transformation of moral decision-making models, in connection with which the universal methods that formulate a moral action (moral act as a choice) can be supplemented by new models that constitute good and moral action.

Ключевые слова


Об авторе

Роман Р. Белялетдинов
Институт философии РАН, Москва, Россия
Россия

кандидат философских наук, старший
научный сотрудник сектора гуманитарных экспертиз и биоэтики Института философии Российской академии наук



Список литературы

1. Брызгалина Е.В. и др. (2018) Биобанкинг: социально-гуманитарные аспекты, М.:

2. Изд-во МГУ.

3. —Bryzgalina E.V. еt al. (2018) Biobanking: social and humanitarian aspects, M.: MSU

4. Publishing House.—in Russ.

5. Горбулева М.С., Мелик-Гайказян И.В., Первушина Н.А. (2020) Инициативы педагогической биоэтики. Высшее образование в России, 29 (6): 122-128.

6. — Gorbuleva M.S., Melik-Gajkazjan I.V., Pervushina N.A. (2020) Initiatives of

7. pedagogical bioethics. Higher Education in Russia, 29 (6): 122-128.—in Russ.

8. Гребенщикова Е.Г. (2018) Социотехнические мнимости технонауки. Вопросы философии, (3): 59–67.

9. —Grebenshhikova E.G. (2018) Sociotechnical imaginary science. Philosophy Issues,

10. (3): 59–67.—in Russ.

11. Лосев А.Ф. (2001) Диалектика мифа, М.: Мысль.

12. —Losev A. F. (2001) Dialectics of myth, M.: Thought.—in Russ.

13. Тищенко П.Д. (2001) Био-власть в эпоху биотехнологий, М.: ИФРАН.

14. — Tishhenko P.D. (2001) Bio-power in the era of biotechnology, M.: IFRAN. —

15. in Russ.

16. Харрис Д. (2019) Моральная слепота—дар божественной машины. Праксема. Проблемы визуальной семиотики, 4: 244-253.

17. —Harris J. (2019) Moral blindness—the gift of the god machine. Praxema. Problems

18. of Visual Semiotics, 4: 244-253.—in Russ.

19. Юдин Б.Г. (2008) В фокусе исследования—человек: этические регулятивы научного познания. Этос науки, М.: Academia, 361-383.

20. — Yudin B.G. (2008) The focus of the study is man: the ethical regulations of

21. scientific knowledge. Ethos of Science, M.: Academia: 361-383.—in Russ.


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Белялетдинов Р.Р. Neurobiology and the Good: Is It Possible to Make a Person Moral? Социология власти. 2020;32(2):87-103. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-2-87-103. EDN: OQGNBT

For citation:


Belyaletdinov R.R. Neurobiology and the Good: Is It Possible to Make a Person Moral? Sociology of Power. 2020;32(2):87-103. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-2-87-103. EDN: OQGNBT

Просмотров: 0


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0492 (Print)
ISSN 2413-144X (Online)