The Sportification of Amateur-level Competitive Com- puter Gaming: The Case of a Student Esports Club
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-3-91-113
Abstract
This article presents the results of an empirical study of the "sportification” of amateur-level competitive computer gaming. How do amateur players, who are unlikely to become professional esports players, turn what is considered to be enjoyable entertainment into a collective activity that demonstrates traits traditionally associated with professional sports, such as self-discipline, a focus on achieving results and overcoming personal limitations? Ethnographic research, consisting of in-depth interviews and participant observations, was conducted in the last quarter of 2019 based on a series of tournaments (Rocket League, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, League of Legends, and Rainbow Six Siege) managed by a student esports club of a Moscow-based university. Such clubs combine different levels of esports practice: players who consider themselves amateurs who attend tournaments "for fun”, players seeking professionalization and who have already received the first modest revenue from their activity, as well as players who achieved the status of a cyberathlete through membership in one of the university teams. Thus, student esports represents an ideal environment for exploring the dynamics of changes in the meanings that players put into their activity, as well as for finding elements holding together what could be called "esports culture”. The analysis conducted in the present article is based not so much on the interpretations of the phenomenon of esports that exists in the field of game studies, as on two classical sociological traditions: the writings of Erving Goffman and Howard Becker, on the one hand, and those of Max Weber and Norbert Elias on the other. As a result, the process of the “sportification” of the amateur practice of competitive computer games is presented in the article as a change in the actors' level of reflexivity: towards the game, towards themselves during play, and towards the world around the game, occurring as they move through the stages of the “career of a competitive player”.
About the Author
Nikita S. AleinikovFrance
a graduate of the CUF of Moscow State University, a student of the «Sociologie d’enquête»
References
1. Беккер Г. (2018) Аутсайдеры: Исследования по социологии девиантности, М.: Элементарные формы.
2. Гофман И. (2000) Представление себя другим в повседневной жизни, М.: КАНОН -пресс-Ц.
3. Элиас Н. (2002) Придворное общество: Исследования по социологии короля и придворной аристократии, М.: Языки славянской культуры. EDN: PRNGNP
4. Alexander J.C., Mandelsaft G. (1991) Les promesses d'une sociologie de la culture. Le discours technologique et la " machine a savoir sacre et profane, HERMES, 1 (8-9): 297-320.
5. Delmotte F. (2010) Termes cles de la sociologie de Norbert Elias. Vingtieme Siecle. Revue d'histoire, 106 (2): 29-36.
6. Ehrenberg A. (1991) Le culte de la performance, Paris: Calmann-Levy.
7. Elias N. (1993) Engagement et distanciation, Paris: Fayard
8. Elias N., Dunning E. (1994) Sport et civilisation la violence maitrisee, Paris: Fayard.
9. Fine G.A. (1979) Small Groups and Culture Creation: The Idioculture of Little League Baseball Teams, American Sociological Review, 44 (5): 733-745.
10. Fine G.A. (2014) With the Boys: Little League Baseball and Preadolescent Culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Fine G.A. (2015) Players and Pawns: How chess builds community and culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Gerber D. (2015) Le jeu video comme pratique discreditable. Reset, (4).
13. Goffman E. (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, N.Y.: Prentice-Hall.
14. Lemieux C. (2018) La sociologie pragmatique, Paris: La Decouverte.
15. Peyron D. (2019) Qu'est-ce que l'identite gamer? Modalites de l'authenticite dans la pratique videoludique. Emulations, (30).
16. Siegel C. (2015) La Gamification, promesse de reenchantement du monde? Colloque Homo Ludens du 21e siecle, Montpellier, France: RIRRA 21 et LIRMM.
17. Stebbins R. (2004) Between Work and Leisure: The Common Ground of Two Separate Worlds, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
18. Shapiro R. (2012) When is Artification? Contemporary Aesthetics, (4).
19. Taylor T.L. (2012) Raising the stakes: e-sports and the professionalization of computer gaming, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20. Wheaton B. (2004) Understanding Lifestyle Sports: Consumption, Identity and Difference, London: Routledge.
21. Defrance J. (2011) Sociologie du sport, Paris: La Decouverte.
Review
For citations:
Aleinikov N.S. The Sportification of Amateur-level Competitive Com- puter Gaming: The Case of a Student Esports Club. Sociology of Power. 2020;32(3):91-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-3-91-113