Preview

Sociology of Power

Advanced search

Why Return Home? A Short Excursion into the History of Russian Fundamental Sociology. Book Review: Bankovskaya S. P. (2023). Strangers and Borders. Research in the Sociology of Marginality. St. Petersburg: Publishing House “Vladimir Dal”

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2023-2-224-241

About the Author

N. A. Volkova
Moscow School of Architecture (MARCH); “Almatygenplan
Russian Federation

Natalia A. Volkova — MA in Sociology (University of Manchester), Master of Urban Development (Vysokovsky Graduate School of Urbanism, Higher School of Economics), Lecturer of the Urbanism module at the Moscow School of Architecture (MARCH); lead researcher, “Almatygenplan”



References

1. Valverde M. (2022) Seeing like a city: The dialectic of modern and premodern ways of seeing in urban governance. Urban Studies and Practicies, 7(3): 116-139. — in Russ.

2. Volkova N. (2022) Non-classical canon of ANT/ STS: how a vessel turns into a pump? Philisophy. The Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 6(2): 39-80. — in Russ.

3. Debord G. (2017) Psychogeography. M.: Ad Marginem. — in Russ.

4. Simmel G. (1996) On social differentiation. The Selected works. Vol. 2. The view of Life. M.: Jurist. — in Russ.

5. Simmel G. (2002) Bol’shie goroda i dukhovnaia zhizn’. Logos, 3(34): 1-12. — in Russ.

6. Law J. (2015) After method: Mess in social science research. M.: Gaydar Institute. — in Russ.

7. Mead G. (2009) Selected works / Ed. V.G. Nikolaev. M.: INION RAN. — in Russ.

8. Park R.E. (2002) The city as a social laboratory. The Social Russian Review, 2(3): 3-12. — in Russ.

9. Popper K.R. (2004) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Moscow: ACT / Yermak. — in Russ.

10. Urry J. (2012) Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. M.: Higher School of Economics. — in Russ.

11. Baehr P. (2017) Founders, classics, canons: Modern disputes over the origins and appraisal of sociology’s heritage. Routledge.

12. Callon M. (1998) Introduction: the embeddedness of economic markets in economics. The sociological review, 46(1_suppl): 1-57.

13. Greimas A.J. (1986) For a topological semiotics. In The city and the sign: an introduction to urban semiotics (pp. 25-54). Columbia University Press.

14. Law J. (1984) On the methods of long-distance control: vessels, navigation and the Portuguese route to India. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl): 234-263.

15. Law J. (2009) Actor network theory and material semiotics. The new Blackwell companion to social theory, 3: 141-158.

16. Law J. & Lin W.Y. (2017) Provincializing STS: Postcoloniality, symmetry, and method. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 11(2): 211-227.

17. Law J. (2021) From After Method to care-ful research (a foreword). Intimate Accounts of Education Policy Research: The Practice of Methods; Routledge: New York, pp. xvi-xx

18. Lury C. & Wakeford N. (2012) Introduction: A perpetual inventory. In Inventive Methods (pp. 1-24). Routledge.

19. Ruming K. (2009) Following the actors: mobilising an actor-network theory methodology in geography. Australian Geographer, 40(4): 451-469.


Review

For citations:


Volkova N.A. Why Return Home? A Short Excursion into the History of Russian Fundamental Sociology. Book Review: Bankovskaya S. P. (2023). Strangers and Borders. Research in the Sociology of Marginality. St. Petersburg: Publishing House “Vladimir Dal”. Sociology of Power. 2023;35(2):224-241. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2023-2-224-241

Views: 97


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0492 (Print)
ISSN 2413-144X (Online)