Preview

Sociology of Power

Advanced search

“Holy Place...”: Religious Monuments of Modern Russia in the Context of an Actor-network Approach

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2022-1-124-139

Abstract

The article demonstrates the possibility of applying an ANT to the analysis of religious monuments. The study of religion within the framework of memory studies demonstrates the realization of a trend laid down in the works of Durkheim regarding the distinction between religion and sacralization as a social phenomenon. From this point of view, religion cannot be regarded as an isolated social institution, but is a way of expressing the functional need to form a sacralized set of social practices and rituals that contribute to the consolidation of society and the strengthening of collective identity. At the same time, in a pluralistic society, the preservation of this function by religion appears to be methodologically archaic, which suggests the involvement of new theoretical approaches that can problematize the place of religion in social space, whilst demonstrating the heterogeneity and fragmentation of religious practices. As a new theoretical model, the article proposes to use the variant of ANT presented in the works of J. Law. Its main principles are the use of spatial metaphors in describing social objects, as well as emphasizing the material status of objects that conflict with spatial configurations. The application of this approach to the analysis of religious monuments allows us to talk about the distinction between the material and network projection of monuments. A religious monument is not just a product of the representation of a certain symbolic system, but also has its own status as an actor. On the one hand, it becomes part of existing network of interactions, and, on the other, it creates new connections and new antitheses that transform the existing memorial landscape, giving rise to new forms of spatial configurations.

About the Author

D. А. Anikin
N. G. Chernyshevsky Saratov State University
Russian Federation

Anikin Daniil Alexandrovich — PhD, associate professor of the Department of Theoretical and Social Philosophy

Research interests: memory research, identity politics, religious anthropology



References

1. Vasilyev A. (2014) Embodied Memory: Commemorative Ritual in Sociology of Émile Durkheim. Russian Sociological Review, 13 (2): 141-167. — in Russ.

2. Vakhshtayn V. S. (2006) John Law: sociology between semiotics and topology. Russian Sociological Review, 5 (1): 24-29. — in Russ.

3. Golovashina O. V. (2018) Нistorical memory in religious movements: Russian researchers’ view. Bulletin of the University of Tambov. Series: Humanities, 23 (175): 141-146. — in Russ.

4. Durkheim E. (2018) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, M.: Delo Publishers RANEPA. — in Russ.

5. Korableva G. B., Merenkov A. V. (2015) Social space of a modern city, Yekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House. — in Russ.

6. Curilla I. (2022) Battle for the Past. How Politics Changes History, M.: Alpina Publisher. — in Russ.

7. Halbwachs M. (2007) Social Memory Framework, M.: New Publishing House. — in Russ.

8. Harman G. (2021) Object Oriented Ontology: New “Theory of Everything”, M.: Ad Marginem. — in Russ.

9. Bellah R. (1967) Civil Religion in America. Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 96 (1): 1-21.


Review

For citations:


Anikin D.А. “Holy Place...”: Religious Monuments of Modern Russia in the Context of an Actor-network Approach. Sociology of Power. 2022;34(1):124-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2022-1-124-139

Views: 86


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0492 (Print)
ISSN 2413-144X (Online)