The Epistemological Status of Charisma in Historical Macrosociology
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-3-99-135
Abstract
The uncertain epistemological status of charisma is largely due to its polysemy and polymorphism. Max Weber thematizes it in a variety of contexts and meanings — distinguishing between magical, religious charisma and the charisma of reason, highlighting the trajectories of routinization and objectification of charisma, typologizing different types of prophecies. In turn, the multiple (re)actualizations of this "brilliant concept” [Rose] as reinforcements of their own theories in the form of varieties of symbolic capital, resonance, the everyday, the re-personalized, or the risky charisma lead to either semantic compression or the blurring of meaning, both within sociological theory and in interdisciplinary discourse. To define the scientific content of charisma, the authors propose to thematize it in historical macrosociology. The key question is addressed to the interdisciplinary connections in Weber's intellectual heritage — is the category "charisma” attributable to Weber the historian or Weber the sociologist?
The clarification of the epistemological status of charisma, expressed in its dual character (phenomenon vs. ideal type), becomes possible thanks to the discussion of a corpus of the classic texts by two prominent German Weberologists — W. Schluchter and F. Tenbruck. In its turn, the reconstruction and systematization of approaches of Weberian historical macrosociology allows us to clarify the boundaries and possibilities of the category's application. Thus, the evolutionary-theoretical perspective defines the heuristic potential of charisma in terms of reflecting the dynamics of cultural and value orientations in the process of emergence and consolidation of social order and institutional structures. The comparative-historical approach, in turn, defines the relationship between the analytical and empirical levels of Weber's sociology through the "immersion” of an ideal-typical construct in a real historical narrative. In this way, historical macrosociology overcomes the most valid criticisms (S. Turner) of the category's failure, heterogeneity, and its residual character.
About the Authors
D. V. KataevRussian Federation
Dmitry V Kataev — Doctor in Sociology, Professor
Lipetsk
V. O. Kalinina
Russian Federation
Valeria O. Kalinina — ma Master’s student of the Department of Sociology
Moscow
References
1. Benjamin W. (1996) The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technical Reproducibility, Moscow: Medium. — in Russ.
2. Weber M. (2016) Economy and Society: Essays of Understanding Sociology. 4 vols., vol. 1: Sociology, Moscow: HSE Publishing House. — in Russ.
3. Weber M. (2017a) The economic ethics of world religions. Experiments in the comparative sociology of religion. Confucianism and Taoism, St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dahl. — in Russ.
4. Weber M. (2017 b) Economy and Society: Essays of Understanding Sociology. 4 vols., vol. 2: Commonalities, Moscow: HSE Publishing House. — in Russ.
5. Geertz С. (2014) Interpretation of cultures, Moscow: ROSSPEN. — in Russ.
6. Joas H. (2005) Creativity of Action, St. Petersburg: Aleteia. — in Russ.
7. Kalinina V. (2024) Charisma and Everyday Life in the Economic Field. Journal of Economic Sociology, 25 (3): 160-182. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-32472024-3-160-182.
8. Kaspe S. I. (2012) Political Theology and Nation-Building: General Provisions, the Russian Case, Moscow: ROSSPEN. — in Russ.
9. Kataev D. V. (2017) Sociology of Max Weber: Late, Incomplete, and Timely. Russian Sociological Review, 16 (3): 428-435. — in Russ.
10. Kataev D. V. (2018) Weberian and anti-Weberian Discourse: Towards a Question of the Hypnotic Power of the Classics on the Example of "Protestant Ethics”. Journal of Economic Sociology, 19 (5): 146-158. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.17323/17263247-2018-5-146-163
11. Kataev D. V. (2020) New Critical Theory or Analytic Empiricism? Russian Sociological Review, 19 (3): 426-449. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192X-2020-3-426-449
12. Maul V.Ya., Lazareva O. V. (2024) "Royal marks” and mythical travels in the system of arguments of Pugachev/Peter III. Humanities researches of the Central Russia, 1 (30),: 20-28. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.24412/2541-9056-2024-130-20-28
13. Rosa H. (2018) The Idea of Resonance as a Sociological Concept. Global Dialogue, 8 (2): 41-44. — in Russ.
14. Tenbruck F. Max Weber's Main Work. Russian Sociological Review, 19 (2): 76-121. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192X-2020-2-76-121
15. Freik N. V. (2001) Political Charisma: A Review of Foreign Concepts. Russian Sociological Review, 1(1): 5-24. — in Russ.
16. Schluchter W. (2004) Action, Order and Culture: The Main Features of the Weberian Research Program. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, (2): 22-50.in Russ.
17. Adair-Toteff С. (2016) Max Weber's Sociology of Religion, Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck.
18. Bachmann U. (2021) Charisma und Moderne: Zur Bedeutung des personalen Charismas in differenzierten Ordnungen. Bachmann, U., Schwinn, T. (Hrsg.) Theorie alsBeruf Studienzum Weber-Paradigma, Wiesbaden: Springer VS: 143-162. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/978-3-658-32000-3_8
19. Bienfait A. (2006) Zeichen und Wunder. Uber die Funktion der Selig — und Heiligsprechungen in der katholischen Kirche. Schwinn T., Albert G. (Hrsg.) Alte Begriffe — Neue Probleme. Max Webers Soziologie im Lichte aktueller Problemstellungen, Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck: 285-310.
20. Biggart N. W. (1989) Charismatic Capitalism: Direct Selling Organizations in America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Bourdieu P. (1987) Sozialer Sinn. Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
22. Eisenstadt E. S. (1968) Introduction. Charisma and Institution Building. Max Weber and Modern Sociology. E. S. Eisenstadt (ed.) On charisma and institution building: selected papers, Chicago: University of Chicago Press: ixlvi.
23. Eisenstadt S. N. (2004) Social evolution and modernity: Some observations on Parsons's comparative and evolutionary analysis: Parsons's analysis from the perspective of multiple modernities. The American Sociologist, (35): 5-24. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12108-004-1020-7
24. Glassman R. (1984) Manufactured Charisma and Legitimacy. Glassman R., Murvar V. (eds.) Max Weber's Political Sociology: A Pessimistic Vision of a Rationalized World, Westport: Greenwood Press: 217-236.
25. Kalberg S. (1994) Max Weber's Comparative-Historical Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Kalberg S. (2013) Deutschland und Amerika aus der Sicht Max Webers, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
27. Kraemer K. (2008) Charisma im okonomischen Feld. Maurer, A., Schimank, U. (Hrsg) Die Gesellschaft der Unternehmen — Die Unternehmen der Gesellschaft, Wiesbaden: Springer VS: 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91199-1_4
28. Roth G., Schluchter W. (2020) Max Weber's vision of history ethics and methods, Berkeley: University of California Press.
29. Samier E. (2005) Toward a Weberian Public Administration: The Infinite Web of History, Values, and Authority in Administrative Mentalities. Halduskultuur, (6): 60-94.
30. Schluchter W. (1989) Rationalism, religion, and domination. A Weberian perspective, Berkeley: University of California Press.
31. Schluchter W. (1992) The Rise of Western rationalism. Max Weber's developmental history, Berkeley: University of California Press.
32. Schluchter W. (2004) The approach of Max Weber's sociology of religion as exemplified in his study of Ancient Judaism. Archives de sciences sociales des religions, 127(3): 33-56. https://doi.org/10.4000/assr.2380
33. Schluchter W., Hanke E., Borchardt K. (2013) Einleitung. Max Weber — Gesamtausgabe Teil: Abt. 1, Schriften und Reden/Bd. 23. Max Weber Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft Soziologie Unvollendet 1919 -1920. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck.
34. Shills E. (1965) Charisma, Order, and Status. American Sociological Review, 30 (2): 199213. https://doi.org/10.2307/2091564
35. Tenbruck F. H. (1975) Das Werk Max Webers. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 27(4): 663-702.
36. Turner S. (1993) Charisma and Obedience: A Risk Cognition Approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 4 (3-4): 235-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(93)90033-P
37. Turner S. (2003) Charisma Reconsidered. Journal of Classical Sociology, 3 (1): 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X03003001692
38. Weber М. (1988) Gesammelte Schriften zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck.
39. Weber M. (1994) Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe, Band II/6:Briefe 1909-1910, Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck.
40. Weber M. (2009) Allgemeine Staatslehre und Politik (Staatssoziologie), Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Review
For citations:
Kataev D.V., Kalinina V.O. The Epistemological Status of Charisma in Historical Macrosociology. Sociology of Power. 2024;36(3):99-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-3-99-135