Project Studies of Expertise and Experience as a Way to Overcome the Crisis of Expert Knowledge: The Problem of Philosophical Foundations

The focus of the article is the project of British sociologists H. Collins and R. Evans on the Study of Expertise and Experience (SEE). The author of this article attempts to explicate the contexts of talking about expertise as a socio-political phenomenon. On the one hand, expertise is discussed in one line of research as an important component of socio-political processes. Expertise is defined in terms of power, its ability to influence decision-making processes in a legitimising way is increasing. On the other hand, the socio-ontological status of expertise is leveled due to the democratisation of access to information and the divergence of the modes of со-existence of science and politics, which is why, according to the researchers, expertise is in crisis. In these contexts, the author turns to the SEE project, which seeks to address the side effects of the proliferation of constructivist sociologies of knowledge and science. By questioning the ability of groups to access the truth and formulate expert judgements on its behalf, constructivist sociology removed the expert as a bearer of specified knowledge from the intellectual scene. Collins and Evans put expertise back on the research agenda; they propose a normative typology of expertise. The author of the article reconstructs the logic of constructing classifications of expertise and problematising two of its key types — interactional and contributory expertise. The article describes in detail the philosophical assumptions behind the concept of interactional expertise. The claims of this concept — as the author of the project sees it — to describe not only a common type of expertise, but also to become one of the conceptual resources for describing society are questionable, due to linguistic reductionism. Collins and Evans reproduce classic problems of sociological theory within the primary distinction of types of expertise.

1. Ashkerov A. A. (2009) Expertocracy. Knowledge Management: Production and Circulation of Information in the Epoch of Ultracapitalism. Moscow: Europe. — in Russ.

2. Knorr-Cetina K. (2006) Sociality and objects. Social relations in post-social knowledge societies. Sociology of things. Moscow: 267-306. — in Russ.

3. Nichols T. (2019) Death of expertise: how the Internet is killing scientific knowledge. M.: Bombra. — in Russ.

4. Reshetnikov A. V., Ayvazyan Sh.G., Prisyazhnaya N. V. (2020) The role of the district doctor in the opinions of young and experienced professionals. Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes, 2: 331-346. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.2.764 — in Russ.

5. Polanyi M. (1995) Personal knowledge. On the way to postcritical philosophy / Edited by V. A. Lektorsky, V. A. Arshinov; transl. by M. B. Gnedovsky, N. M. Smirnova, B. A. Starostin. Мoscow. — in Russ.

6. Stolyarova O. (2018) The Third Wave of Science Research as a Philosophical Justification of STS. Logos, 28, 5(126): 31-52. — in Russ.

7. Winch P. (1996) Ideas of social science and its relation to philosophy / Transl. by M. Gorbacheva, T. Dmitriev. M.: Russian Phenomenological Society. — in Russ.

8. Filippov A. F. (2003) Theoretical foundations of the sociology of space. M.: Kanon-Press-C, 2003. — in Russ.

9. Fuller S. (2021) Post-truth: knowledge as a struggle for power. Moscow: HSE, 2021. — in Russ

10. Collins H. M., Evans R. J. (2015) Expertise Revisited. Pt. I: Interactional Expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, pt. A 54: 113–123. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1611.04423

11. Collins H., Evans R. (2007) Rethinking expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

12. Collins H., Evans R. (2002) The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32 (2): 235-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003

13. Collins H. (2018) Studies of Expertise and Experience. Topoi, 37: 67–77. https://link. springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-016-9412-1

14. Collins H. (2010) Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Collins H. M. et al. (2020) Experts and the Will of the People. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Fischer F. (2009) Democracy and expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry. OUP Oxford.

15. Fuller S. (2001) Knowledge Management Foundations. Routledge. Eyal G. (2019) The Crisis of Expertise. Polity Press.

16. Grundmann R., Stehr N. (2012) Experts: The knowledge and power of expertise. London: Rutledge.

17. Inbar D. (2020) Bash the Expert: Expertise Amid the COVID-19 Crisis Conference Summary. Institute for National Security Studies (INSS).

18. Jasanoff S. (2003) Breaking the Waves in Science Studies: Comment on H. M. Collins and Robert Evans, “The Third Wave of Science Studies”. Social Studies of Science, 33 (3): 389-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333004

19. Jasanoff S. (1990) The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

20. Latour B. (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2): 225-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.2.764

21. Turner S. P. (2013) The Politics of Expertise (1st ed.). Routledge.

22. Wynne B. (2003) Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism: Response to Collins & Evans (2002). Social Studies of Science, 33(3): 401-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333005