“The Best Interests of the Child”: the Problem of Definition in Social Sciences
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2023-4-21-47
Abstract
The article analyzes some possibilities of defining the "best interests of the child" as a concept and principle that arose in the context of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The "interests of the child" do not have a clear definition and become open to different interpretations. Ideas about right actions towards the "interests of the child" can vary on the level of practices, depending on the actor or group of actors. The article examines the emergence of the concept of "the interests of the child" as one of the principles of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and notes the difference between the "opinion" of the child and their "interests", which relate to the implementation of children's rights. The article provides a brief overview of critical works on the concept of "child interests" — and discusses findings from the field of social sciences — that help contextualize “childhood” and ideas about "children's interests" through a social and cultural framework. The author suggests conceptualizing of the "interests of the child" as a rationalized myth in the terms of J. Meyer and B. Rowan.
About the Author
A. A. Martynenko
Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexandra A. Martynenko — junior researcher, Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Aries Ph. (1999). The Child and Family Life under The Old Regime, Ekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing. — in Russ.
2. Lovtsova N. (2003) “A Healthy, Prosperous Family — Support of The State”? Gender Analysis of Family Social Policу. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 1(3-4): 323-339. — in Russ.
3. McCarthy J. R., Edwards R. (2018) Key Concepts in Family Studies, M.: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. — in Russ.
4. Meyer J. W., Rowan B. (2011) Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. Economic Sociology, 12 (1): 43-67. https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2011-1-43-67 — in Russ.
5. Mead M. (1988) Culture and The World of Childhood: Selected Works, M.: Nauka. — in Russ.
6. Mirolyubova O. (2012) About The Family Legal Concept of “The Interests of The Child”. Bulletin of the Yaroslavl State University. Humanities Series, 4: 56-58. — in Russ.
7. Russian Family and Children Well-Being (2021). Ed. I. Eliseeva, M.: Federal Center of Theorethical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Science. — in Russ.
8. Archard D. (2003) Children, Family, and The State, L.: Routledge.
9. Alston P. (1994) The Best Interests Principle: Towards a Reconciliation of Culture and Human Rights. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 8(1): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/8.1.1
10. Ainsworth F., Hansen P. (2009) The “Best Interests of The Child” Thesis: Some Thoughts from Australia. International journal of Social Welfare, 18(4): 431-439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00673.x
11. Boyden J. (1997) Childhood and the Policy Makers: A Comparative Perspective on The Globalization of Childhood. Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood.
12. Dixon R., Nussbaum M. (2012) Children’s Rights and a Capabilities Approach: The Question of Special Priority. Cornell Law Review, 97: 549-591. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol97/iss3/3
13. Elster J. (1987) Solomonic Judgments: Against the Best Interest of the Child. Chicago Law Review, 54 (1): 1-45. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol54/iss1/1
14. Eekelaar J. (2002) Beyond the Welfare Principle. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 14(3): 237-249. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2086558
15. Finch J. (2007) Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1): 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072284
16. Fortin J. (2006) Accommodating Children’s Rights in a Post Human Rights Act Era.
17. Modern Law Review, 69(3): 299-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00586.x
18. Gnydiuk O. (2021) Defining the “Best Interests” of Children During the Post-1945 Transformations in Europe. Journal of Modern European History, 19(3): 292-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944211020460
19. Goldstein J., Solnit A., Goldstein S., Freud A. (1996) The Best Interests of the Child: The Least Detrimental Alternative, N.-Y.: Free Press.
20. Hanson K. (2012) Schools of thought in children’s rights. Children’s rights from below, (1): 63-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230361843_5
21. Herring J. (2005) Farwell Welfare? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 27(2): 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649060500195989
22. James A., Prout A. (1990) Constructing and reconstructing childhood: New directions in the sociological study of childhood, Oxford: Routledge.
23. Kagitcibasi C. (2007) Family, Self, and Human Development Across Cultures: Theory and Applications, Oxford: Routledge.
24. King M. (ed.) (1990) Moral Agendas for Children’s Welfare, Oxford: Routledge.
25. Korbin J. (1977) Anthropological Contributions to the Study of Child Abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 1(1): 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(77)90042-4
26. Korbin J. (1980) The Cultural Context of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect, 1(4): 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(80)90028-9
27. Korbin J. (1987) Child Abuse and Neglect: The Cultural Context. The battered child, (1): 23-41.
28. Piper C. (2000) Assumptions about Children’s Best Interests. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, (22): 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/01418030050130176
29. Qvortrup J. (ed.) (2009) The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies, L.: Palgrave Macmillan.
30. Rose N. (1990) Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self, L.: Taylor & Frances/ Routledge.
31. Reece H. (1996) The Paramountcy Principle: Consensus or Construct. Current Legal Problems, (49): 267-289. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/49.1.267
32. Ryrstedt E. (2012) Mediation Regarding Children: Is the Result Always in the Best Interests of the Child? A View from Sweden. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 26(2): 220-241. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebs005
33. Smeyers P. (2010) Child Rearing in the “Risk” Society: On the Discourse of Rights and the “Best Interests of a Child.” Educational Theory, 3(60): 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2010.00358.x
34. Sempek A., Woody R. (2010) Family Permanence versus the Best Interests of the Child. American Journal of Family Therapy, 38: 433-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2010.522492
35. Whiting B. (ed.) (1963) Six cultures: Studies of child rearing, N.-J.: John Wiley & Sons.
Review
For citations:
Martynenko A.A. “The Best Interests of the Child”: the Problem of Definition in Social Sciences. Sociology of Power. 2023;35(4):21-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2023-4-21-47
Views:
106
Email this article 