Cosmopolitics vs Biopolitics: Body, Technoutopia and Access to Space

The paper examines the body as a stake in space exploration at the intersection of technology, material practices and utopian imaginaries. Based on an interpretation of the film “Gattaca” in the light of the problem of access to space, the paper opposes two techno-utopian regimes — cosmopolitics and biopolitics. Cosmopolitics assumes an equality of access to space for all beings, while biopolitics links bodily restrictions to the problem of regravitation. Regravitation is the biopolitical practice aimed at preserving the “terrestrial” conditions of the body’s existence. The problem of access to space is exemplified by the debate over the boundary between Earth’s atmosphere and space in the NewSpace movement. A radical step here is taken by space amateurs, defining the stratosphere as “almost space”. In this sense, the amateurs' space techno-utopia turns out to be cosmopolitan — not so much in the sense of space as a political order equal to all beings and entities, but in the sense of a politics of equal access to space beyond Earth. K. E. Tsiolkovsky’s amateur techno-utopia proposes a radical transformation of the body and its liberation from terrestrial gravity. People will become “citizens of the ether” with the help of an extreme environment and gain additional opportunities.

1. Delany S. (2020) Babel-17. The Einstein Intersection, SPb.: Azbuka; AzbukaAttikus. — in Russ.

2. Kozhemyakin V. (2021) Is that true you can’t be a cosmonaut with tatoo? Argumenty i fakty, 18.09.2021. https://aif.ru/society/science/pravda_chto_v_kosmonavty_ne_berut_s_tatuirovkoy — in Russ.

3. Lebedev V. (1994) My dimension: cosmonaut’s diary, M.: Nauka. — in Russ.

4. Savinyh V. (2010) Vyatka. Baikonur. Space, M.: Izdatel’stvo “MAKD”. — in Russ.

5. Sivkov D. (2018) Self or Non-self? Constructing the body in immunology. Logos, (5): 249-286. — in Russ.

6. Sivkov D.Yu. (2019) Space exploration at home: Amateur cosmonautics in contemporary Russia. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, (6): 67-79. — in Russ.

7. Sivkov D.Yu. (2020a) Access to Space: Russian Amateur Technologies in Space Research and Exploration. Sociologiya nauki i tekhniki, (3): 179-197. — in Russ.

8. Sivkov D.Yu. (2020b) Of scales and places: Ontologies of space exploration. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya, (1): 75-96. — in Russ.

9. Siddiqi A. (2005) Science beyond the academy: Tsiolkovski’s alternative network of scientific communication. Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki, (4): 137-154. — in Russ.

10. Usachev Yu. (2004) Cosmonaut’s diary: three lives in space, M.: Gelios. — in Russ.

11. Fedorov N. F. (1995) Collected papers in four volumes. Vol. I, M.: Progress. — in Russ.

12. Foucault M. (2005) “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976, SPb.: Nauka. — in Russ.

13. Tsiolkovsky K. E. (1967) Study of outer space by reaction devices, M.: Mashinostroenie. — in Russ.

14. Tsiolkovsky K. (2017a) Selected writings in two volumes. Vol. I, M.: Knizhnyj Klub Knigovek. — in Russ.

15. Tsiolkovsky K. (2017b) Selected writings in two volumes. Vol. II, M.: Knizhnyj Klub Knigovek. — in Russ.

16. Banner O. (2011) The Postracial Imagination: Gattaca’s Imperfect Science. Discourse, 33(2): 221-241.

17. Bernstein A. (2019) The Future of Immortality: Remaking Life and Death in Contemporary Russia, Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.

18. Bjørnvig Th. (2013) Outer space religion and the overview effect: a critical inquiry into a classic of the pro-space movement. Astropolitics: The International Journal of Space Politics & Policy, 11(1-2): 4-24.

19. Finney B. (1992) From Sea to Space, Palmerston North: Massey University.

20. Gerovitch S. (2015) Soviet Space Mythologies: Public Images, Private Memories, and the Making of a Cultural Identity, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

21. Haraway D. (1989) Primate Vision: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science, London, New York: Routledge.

22. Junker K. W. (1999) Gattaca: defacing the future. Futures, 31: 631-635.

23. Kirby D. (2000) The New Eugenics in Cinema: Genetic Determinism and Gene Therapy in “GATTACA”. Science Fiction Studies, 27(2): 193-215.

24. Kohonen I. (2011) The Heroic and the Ordinary: Photographic Representations of Soviet Cosmonauts in the Early 1960s. Soviet Space Culture: Cosmic Enthusiasm in Socialist Societies, New York: Palgrave.

25. Mitchell S. T. (2017) Constellations of inequality. Space, race, and utopia in Brazil, Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.

26. Patarin-Jossec J. (2020) The politics of heroes’ body: ethnographying the training of foreign astronaut in Russia. Corpus Mundi, 1(2): 14-36.

27. Pomeroy C., Calzada-Diaz A., Bielicki D. (2019) Funding me to the Moon: Crowdfunding and the New Space economy. Space Policy, 47: 44-50.

28. Shaw D. B. (2004) Bodies out of this world: the spacesuit as cultural icon. Science as Culture, 13(1): 123-144.

29. Tutton R. (2021) Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Techno-Optimism: Examining Outer Space Utopias of Silicon Valley. Science as Culture, 30(3): 416-439.

30. Valentine D. (2017) Gravity fixes: Habituating to the human on Mars and Island Three. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic theory, (7): 185-209.

31. Wall M. (2022) Will Richard Branson actually reach space on Virgin Galactic’s 1st fully crewed launch? space.com (https://www.space.com/will-richard-branson-reachspace-virgin-galactic)

32. White F. (2014) The overview effect: space exploration and human evolution. Third Edition, Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.