Civilizational Analysis in Historical Sociology and Explanations of the “Soviet Collapse"

The article deals with attempts to explain the collapse of the Soviet version of modernity — and the disintegration of the USSR — in (post)-Sovietology and historical sociology. It is argued that (post)-Sovietological studies were often characterized by a certain degree of ideological bias. In these studies, the example of “Soviet collapse” was generally used for a confirmation of earlier approaches to Soviet history. At the same time, they mostly focused on the immediate preconditions of that event rather than on long-term historical processes. The shortcomings of this approach can be overcome if we draw on historical sociology. The article considers the prediction of disintegration of the USSR offered by Randall Collins and Johann Arnason's analysis of the Soviet version of modernity. Both sociologists characterized the Soviet collapse in the context of long-term historical dynamics. While Collins's approach demonstrates a peculiar geopolitical determinism, Arnason singles out various factors of the dynamics of the alternative version of modernity. In the first half of the 1990s, Arnason applied his model of imperial modernization to the Soviet system, but later emphasized the civilizational aspects of communist modernity. This can also be seen in his evaluation of the Soviet collapse. In the literature on Soviet collapse, a contrast between the USSR and China is often highlighted, with structural and particularly economic factors being commonly highlighted. In contrast, the article argues that — for a comprehensive understanding of transformation processes in China — we need to consider the cultural sphere by drawing on sociological civilizational analysis.

1. Arnason J. (2021) Civilizational Patterns and Historical Processes. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. — in Russ.

2. Arnason J. (2021) The Totalitarian Schism: Alternative Modernities of the 20th Century. Neprikosnovennyi zapas. Debaty o politike i kul'ture, 1: 105-130. — in Russ. VOFVDZ

3. Braslavskiy R., Maslovskiy M. (2014) Civilizational Analysis and Soviet Modernity. Neprikosnovennyi zapas. Debaty o Politike i kul'ture, 6: 45-55. — in Russ.

4. David-Fox M. (2016) Russian-Soviet Modernity: None, Shared, Alternative or Entangled? Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 4: 19-44. — in Russ.

5. Karasev D.Yu. (2021) J. Arnason's Civilizational and Relational Analysis and Global Dimension of Soviet Modernity. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 9: 151-156. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250016501-4

6. Collins R. (2008) Prediction in Macrosociology: The Case of Soviet Collapse. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, 3: 4-29. — in Russ.

7. Kotkin S. (2018) Armageddon Averted: The Soviet Collapse, 1970-2000. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. — in Russ.

8. Krylova A. (2016) "Soviet Modernity”: Stephen Kotkin and the Paradoxes of American Historiography. Neprikosnovennyi zapas. Debaty o politike i kul'ture, 4: 118-136. — in Russ.

9. Mann M. (2018) The Sources of Social Power. Vol. 4. Globalizations, 1945-2011. Moscow: RANKhiGS. — in Russ.

10. Maslovskiy M. V. (2008) Neo-Weberian Historical Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 3: 119-126. — in Russ.

11. Titarenko L. G. (2022) Eastern Asian Modernity in the Civilizational Conception of Johann Arnason. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii, 25 (2): 80-95. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.25.2.4

12. Yurchak A. (2014) Everything Was Forever Until There Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. — in Russ.

13. Arnason J. (1993) The Future that Failed: Origins and Destinies of the Soviet Model. London: Routledge.

14. Arnason J. (2003) Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions. Leiden: Brill.

15. Arnason J. (2020) The Labyrinth of Modernity: Horizons, Pathways and Mutations. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

16. Coker C. (2019) The Rise of the Civilizational State. Cambridge: Polity.

17. Collins R. (1986) Weberian Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18. Collins R. (2001) Civilizations as Zones of Prestige and Social Contact. International Sociology, 16 (3): 421-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858001016003011

19. Fitzpatrick S. (2007) Revisionism in Soviet History. History and Theory, 46 (4): 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2007.00429.X

20. Katzenstein P. (2012) China's Rise: Rupture, Return or Recombination? In P. Katzenstein (ed.) Sinicization and the Rise of China: Civilizational Processes Beyond East and West. Abingdon: Routledge: 1-38.

21. Kotkin S. (1995) Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilization. Berkeley: University of California Press.

22. Maslovskiy M. (2023) Johann P. Arnason's Analysis of Communism and the Debate on Soviet Modernity. International Journal of Social Imaginaries, 2 (1): 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1163/27727866-bja00024

23. Pye L. (1992) The Spirit of Chinese Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

24. Rowley D. (2001) Interpretations of the End of the Soviet Union: Three Paradigms. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2 (2): 395-426. https://doi.org/10.1353/kri.2008.0107

25. Sakwa R. (2013) The Soviet Collapse: Contradictions and Neo-Modernization. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 4 (1): 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.euras.2012.07.003

26. Spohn W. (2011) World History, Civilizational Analysis and Historical Sociology: Interpretations of Non-Western Civilizations in the Work of Johann Arnason. European Journal of Social Theory, 14 (1): 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431010394506

27. Therborn G. (2021) States, Nations and Civilizations. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 14 (2): 225-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-020-00307-1