“Walking for Legends”: The Study of Mystery as a Method. Book Review: McNeill L. S., & Tucker E. (Eds.) (2018) Legend Tripping: A Contemporary Legend Casebook. University Press of Colorado
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-1-172-191
About the Author
N. A. VolkovaRussian Federation
Natalia A. Volkova — MA in Sociology (University of Manchester), Master of Urban Development (Vysokovsky Graduate School of Urbanism, Higher School of Economics), Lecturer of the Urbanism module at the Moscow School of Architecture (MARCH), lead researcher
Moscow
Almaty
References
1. Baiduzh M. (2018) Ghost Hunting: Practices of Legend-Tripping in Anthropology and Folklore Studies. Urban Folklore & Anthropology, I(1): 44–58. — in Russ.
2. Benjamin W. (1996) The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. Meidium. — in Russ.
3. van Gennep A. (1989) The rites of passage. Moscow: Eastern Literature.
4. Danilov V. (1962) Genre characteristics of Old Russian “goings”. The Works of the Section of Old Russian Literature. М., L. Vol. 18: 21-37.
5. Dégh L., Vázsonyi A. (2018) Does the word “dog” bite? Ostensive action: a means of legend-telling. Urban Folklore & Anthropology, 1(1): 66–106. — in Russ.
6. Zenkin S. (2019) Rene Girard: desire — mimesis — narrative. In.: Girard R. Lie of Romanticism and Truth of Novel: 7‒28. Moscow: NLO. — in Russ.
7. Tucker E. (Author), Baiduzh M. (Int.) (2018) “Don’t you take up her legends course! It’s too difficult!”: on American contemporary legend studies, Linda Dégh and academical journals. Urban Folklore & Anthropology, I(1): 59–64. — in Russ.
8. Ben-Amos D. (1998) A performer-centered study of narration: A review article. Anthropos (H. 4/6): 556‒558. https://doi.org/10.2307/5418171
9. Ellis B. (1996) “Legend Trip.” In American Folklore: An Encyclopedia, ed. Jan Harold Brunvand: 439–440. New York: Garland.
10. Ellis B. (2015) Linda Dégh-Vázsonyi (1920–2014). Fabula, 56(1-2): 119‒129. https://doi.org/10.1515/fabula-2015-0009
11. Dégh L. (1989) Folktales and society: story-telling in a Hungarian peasant community: expanded edition with a new afterword (No. 526). Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/1500378
12. Dégh L. (2001) Legend and belief: dialectics of a folklore genre. Indiana University Press.
13. Dégh L. (1996) What is a belief legend? Folklore, 107(1-2): 33‒46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1260912
14. Dégh L., Vázsonyi A. (1978) The crack on the red goblet or truth and modern legend. Folklore in the Modern World: 253‒272. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803099.253
15. Dégh L. (1980) Reply: Folk and Volk. The Journal of American Folklore, 93(369): 331‒334. ttps://doi.org/10.2307/540578
16. Degh L., Moss L. (1970) Is There a Folk in the City?: Prepared Comments. The Journal of American Folklore, 83 (330): 217‒224. https://www.jstor.org/stable/539659
17. Dégh L. (1995) Narratives in society: A performer-centered study of narration (No. 255). Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, Academia Scientiarum Fennica; Distr. in the Us by Indiana University Press. Цит. по: Stone K. (2008) Some day your witch will come. Wayne State University Press.
18. Dorson R. (1963) Current folklore theories. Current anthropology, 4(1): 93‒112. https://doi.org/10.1086/200339
19. Dorson R. (1970) Is there a folk in the city? The Journal of American Folklore, 83(328): 185‒216. https://doi.org/10.2307/539108
20. Dorson R. M. (1976) Folklore and fakelore: Essays toward a discipline of folk studies. Harvard University Press.
21. Dorson R. (1982) The state of folkloristics from an American perspective. Journal of the Folklore Institute, 19(2/3): 71‒105. https://doi.org/10.2307/3814007
22. McNeill L. S., Tucker E. (eds.) (2018) Legend Tripping: A Contemporary Legend Casebook. University Press of Colorado.
23. Sydow C. W. von (1948) “Geography and Folk-Tale Oicotypes.” Selected Papers on 191 Folklore. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde and Bagger, 44–59. Цит. по: Hasan-Rokem G. (2016) Ecotypes: Theory of the Lived and Narrated Experience. Narrative Culture, 3(1): 110‒137.
24. Thigpen Jr, K. A. (1971) Adolescent legends in Brown county: a survey. Indiana Folklore, 4(2): 141‒215.
Review
For citations:
Volkova N.A. “Walking for Legends”: The Study of Mystery as a Method. Book Review: McNeill L. S., & Tucker E. (Eds.) (2018) Legend Tripping: A Contemporary Legend Casebook. University Press of Colorado. Sociology of Power. 2024;36(1):172-191. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-1-172-191