Where the Mortal God Meets the Real: The Theory of the State in the Context of the Philosophy of Zizek and Reisner

The article is devoted to a rethinking of the state as a political form from the perspective of Slavoj Žižek’s psychoanalytical understanding of ideology and Mikhail Reisner’s theory of the state. The paper systematically outlines Žižek’s ideas from the early period of his work and Reisner’s theory of the state. Žižek, rejecting the traditional understanding of ideology as false consciousness, presents it as a necessity that structures reality. In turn, Reisner views the state not only as an instrument of oppression but also as a psychological phantasm based on the ideas and unconscious attitudes of the masses. Synthesising Žižek’s ideas with Reisner’s legacy forms the main aim of this article. In combining the two perspectives, the state turns out to be the ideology that organises contemporary political experience and conceals a certain traumatic impossibility of symbolising the Real. The attempt to look at the state-as-ideology through the prism of psychoanalysis reveals the mechanisms of its functioning as the main signifier around which political-legal discourse and political practice are centered. It turns out that the state-as-ideology replaces other forms of political communities both temporally and spatially. Overcoming this situation is possible through bringing the phantasm of the state back to the human psyche. This, in turn, requires a recognition of the presence of an unsymbolised lack at the very heart of the symbolic order, undermining the absolute power of the state-as-ideology to determine the structure of political reality. The non-obvious intellectual connection between Žižek and Reisner and their original views on the nature of ideology and the state provide an opportunity to take a fresh look at the principles of the structure of the contemporary political form and to contribute to the ongoing debate on the state.

1. Althusser L. (2006) Marxism and humanism. L. Althusser. For Marx, M.: Praxis: 311-352. — in Russ.

2. Althusser L. (2011) Ideology and the ideological apparatuses of the state. Neprikosnovennyj zapas, (3) (accessed 01/12/2024). — in Russ.

3. Belov M. A. (2023) The development of psychological and Marxist legal concepts in critical ideas of the Soviet period. I. I. Osvetimskaya, E. N. Tonkov (eds.). Critical Theories of Law: Collective Monograph, St. Petersburg: Aletheia: 113-127. — in Russ.

4. Bourdieu P. (2016) On the State: Lectures at the Collège de France (1989–1992), M.: “Delo” Publishing House RANEPA. — in Russ.

5. Ginzburg C. (2010) Fear. Reverence. Terror, М.: lettera.org project. — in Russ.

6. Gramsci A. (1959) Prison Notebooks, М.: Foreign Literature Publishing House. — in Russ.

7. Žižek S. (1999) The sublime object of ideology, М.: Publishing House “Art. magazine”. 75 — in Russ.

8. Laclau E. (2003) The impossibility of society. Logos, (4-5): 54-57. — in Russ.

9. Laclau E. (2009) On populism. Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. 12. Political Science, 3: 54-68. — in Russ.

10. Jorgensen M., Phillips L. J. (2008) Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method, Kh.: Humanitarian Centre Publishing House. — in Russ.

11. Marx K., Engels F. (1988) The German Ideology, М.: Politizdat. — in Russ.

12. Mascaro A. L. (2022) State and political form, М.: Horizontal. — in Russ.

13. Marchenko M. N. (2017) Theory of State and Law: textbook, М.: Prospect. — in Russ.

14. Mouffe C. (2013) Radical Democracy and Agonist Politics: A Recipe for Hegemony for Any Power — for the Power of Modernity. GEFTER. — in Russ.

15. Olivecrona K. (2011) Is a sociological explanation of law possible? A. V. Polyakov (ed.). Russian Yearbook of the Theory of Law, No. 4. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbSU: 387-417. — in Russ.

16. Petrażycki L. (1905) Introduction to the Study of Law and Morality. Emotional Psychology, St. Petersburg: Typography of Y. N. Ehrlich. — in Russ.

17. Petrażycki L. (1909) Theory of Law and State in Connection with the Theory of Morality. Vol. 1, St. Petersburg: Tipografiya comradeship “Ekaterinhofskoe Pechetatnoe Delo”. — in Russ.

18. Piatigorsky A. (2007) What is Political Philosophy: Reflections and Considerations. A series of lectures, М.: Europa. — in Russ.

19. Reisner M. A. (1908) Petrazhitsky’s Theory, Marxism and Social Ideology, St. Petersburg: Tipography of the “Public Utility” Society. — in Russ.

20. Reisner M. A. (1918) The State. Part 1, Ideology and Method, Publishing of the Socialist Academy of Social Sciences. — in Russ.

21. Reisner M. A. (1925) Problems of social psychology, Rostov n/D: Storm Petrel. — in Russ.

22. Reisner M. A. (1991) Freudism and bourgeois ideology. Wittels F. Freud. His personality, teachings and school, L.: Ego: 5-35. — in Russ,

23. Syutkin A. (2019) Gilles Deleuze among the new materialists: materialist dialectics versus neo-vitalism. Stasis, 7(1): 420-447. — in Russ.

24. Uzlaner D. (2022) Jacques Lacan: An Introduction, М.: RIPOL Classic. — in Russ.

25. Engels F. (1965) Letter to Franz Mehring. Marx K., Engels F. Complete Collected Works. Vol. 39, М.: Publishing House of Political Literature: 82-86. — in Russ.

26. Etkind A. M. (1994) Eros of the Impossible: The Development of Psychoanalysis in Russia, М.: Gnosis; Progress-Complex. — in Russ.

27. De Sutter L. (ed.). (2015) Žižek and Law, N. Y.: Routledge.

28. Filippov A. (2020) The State in the International Legal Order. A. Magun (ed.). The Future of The State Philosophy and Politics, Lanhmam: Rowman & Littlefield: 39-64.

29. Hamza A. (2020) The March of God or the Žižekian Theory of the State. A. Magun (ed.). The Future of The State Philosophy and Politics, Lanhmam: Rowman & Littlefield: 187-204.

30. Khader J., Rothenberg M. (eds.). (2013) Žižek now! Current Perspectives in Žižek Studies, Cambridge: Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780190221911-0080

31. Magun A. (2020) Introduction. A. Magun (ed.). The Future of The State Philosophy and Politics, Lanhmam: Rowman & Littlefield: 1-22.

32. Matthew S. (2004) Slavoj Žižek: A Little Piece of the Real, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315243009

33. Matthew S., Boucher G. (2010) Žižek and Politics: A Critical Introduction, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748642229

34. Newman S. (2019) Political Theology: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: Polity. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00325-z

35. Parker I. (2013) Žižek’s Sublime Objects Now. J. Khader, M. Rothenberg (eds.). Žižek and Politics: A Critical Introduction, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press: 16-30.

36. Žižek S. (2003) Che vuoi? Žižek S. (ed.). Jacques Lacan: Critical Evaluations in Critical Theory, London: Routledge: 338-375.

37. Žižek S. (2015) Postscript: The Rule of Law Between Obscenity and the Right to Distress. Žižek and Law, N. Y.: Routledge: 220-247.

38. Žižek S. (2017) Introduction: Remembering, Repeating and Working Through. S. Žižek (ed.). Lenin 2017 Remembering, Repeating, and Working Through, London: Verso: 8-56.