Time of Protest: Multi-temporality as an Attribute of the Relations of Power and Resistance

The article examines how the perception of historical time influences the dynamics of power relations and resistance. It draws on the concept of multitemporality, which posits that different 'temporal regimes' — different experiences of time and different temporal constructions of past, present, and future — can coexist. Drawing on the work of K. Mannheim, H. Rosa, and M. Foucault, the article illustrates that power and resistance operate in different temporal regimes, perceive social change at different speeds, and have different attitudes towards the past and the future. The article explores how the optics of multitemporality can serve resistance politics and have an emancipatory effect. Using Foucault's concepts of power and resistance, it describes specific multitemporal characteristics associated with power and resistance, such as power's tendency to slow down the passage of time and resistance's struggle against the determination of the future. The article considers how the temporal aspect helps power to maintain and strengthen its dominance, while enabling resistance to create alternative future scenarios. It emphasizes that resistance acts as a catalyst for social change and, drawing on the ideas of Foucault and Deleuze, underlines the primacy of resistance over power. It concludes that resistance not only seeks to outpace power in time, but represents a qualitatively different approach to time and history.

1. Bevernage B (2016) Allochronism, temporal equality and modernity. A critique of Johannes Fabian’s project of radical modernity and the case for a new politics of time. Sociology of Power, 28 (2): 174-202. — in Russ.

2. Deleuze J. (1998) Foucault. M.: Publishing House of Humanitarian Literature. — in Russ.

3. Mannheim K. (1994) Ideology and Utopia. Diagnosis of our time, M.: Lawyer: 7-276. — in Russ.

4. Raunig G. (2012) Art and Revolution: Artistic Activism in the Long Twentieth Century, St. Petersburg: European University Press in St. Petersburg. — in Russ.

5. Foucault M. (2011) Security, territories, populations. Course of lectures given at the Collège de France in the 1977‒1978 academic year, St. Petersburg: Nauka. — in Russ.

6. Foucault M. (1996) The will to truth: beyond knowledge, power and sexuality, M.: Castal. — in Russ.

7. Foucault M. (2006) Subject and Power. Intellectuals and power. Part 3, M.: Praxis: 161-191. — in Russ.

8. Anderson B. (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.

9. Gillan K. (2020) Temporality in social movement theory: vectors and events in the neoliberal timescape. Social Movement Studies, 19(5-6): 516-536. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1548965

10. Gillan K., Edwards G. (2020) Time for change. Social Movement Studies, 19(5-6): 501- 515. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1806813

11. Hartog F. (2015) Regimes of Historicity: Presentism and Experiences of Time, New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/hart16376

12. Haydu J. (2020) Adding time to social movement diffusion. Social Movement Studies, 19(5-6): 625-639. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1599851

13. Hochschild A. (2016) Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right, New York: The New Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1589751

14. Jordheim H. (2014) Introduction: Multiple times and the work of synchronization. History and Theory, 53 (4): 498-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10728

15. Kaun A. (2016) Our time to act has come: desynchronization, social media 59 time andprotest movements. Media, Culture & Society, 39 (4): 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716646178

16. Kettler D., Loader C. (2004) Temporizing with Time Wars: Karl Mannheim and Problems of Historical Time. Time & Society, 13 (2–3): 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X04040739

17. Lilja M. (2018) The politics of time and temporality in Foucault’s theorisation of resistance: ruptures, time-lags and decelerations. Journal of Political Power, 11(3): 419432. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2018.1523319

18. Lorenz C. & Bevernage B. (2013) Breaking Up Time. Negotiating the Borders between Present, Past and Future, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666310461.7

19. Maeckelbergh M. (2011) Doing is believing: Prefiguration as strategic practice in the alterglobalization movement. Social Movement Studies, 10(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.545223

20. Payne C. (2007). I‘ve got the light of freedom: The organizing tradition and the Mississippi freedom struggle, Berkeley: University of California Press.

21. Rosa H. (2013) Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity, New York: Columbia University Press.

22. Torpey J. (2006) Making Whole what Has Been Smashed: On Reparations Politics, Camvridge, London: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17477093.2006.00038.x

23. Vazquez R. (2009) Modernity Coloniality and Visibility: The Politics of Time. Sociological Research Online, 14(4). URL: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1990