Whose Calculations? Which Rationalities?: Rationality of Governmentality and Irrationality of Risks in the Concept of Foucault

This article is dedicated to investigating rationality as one of the key characteristics of Michel Foucault's concept of governmentality and to related 30 contradictions inside and outside Foucauldian theory. Using risk theory, the author explores the possibility of the existence of multiple rationalities in governmentalities and offers a solution to the contradiction within Foucauldian theory. The article focuses on the question of how it is possible to resolve both methodological, practical, as well as theoretical, contradictions in the theory of governmentality, keeping its main characteristics, such as population-centeredness, intact. The author concludes that diversification is more effective within the framework of multiple rationalities, which is most consistent with the understanding of the governmentality of the population as a goal, as a mechanism of risk management. The article makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the relationship between rationality and irrationality in the theory of governmentality, putting forward new ideas for the research and development of effective forms of public administration. The author also suggests ways to solve the paradox of regulated freedom, which has practical implications for modern methods of governance and regulation in society. This more detailed analysis clarifies how Foucault's concept of governmentality can be applied in a contemporary context, and how the limitations of rationality can be overcome to achieve more flexible and adaptive forms of governance.

1. Weber M. (2016) Economy and Society: Essays on Understanding Sociology, M.: Publishing house of the Higher School of Economics. — in Russ. Дуглас М. (2020)

2. Douglas M. (2020) How institutions think, M.: Elementary forms. — in Russ.

3. Ilyin M. V. (1997) Words and meanings. Experience in describing key political concepts, M.: “Russian Political Encyclopedia” (ROSSPEN). — in Russ.

4. Mitchell D. (2016) Pravitel’nost’: vlast’ i pravlenie v sovremennykh obshchestvakh [Governmentality: power and rule in modern societies], M.: Publishing house “Delo” RANEPA. — in Russ.

5. Orlov A. I., Pugach O. V. (2012) Approaches to general theory of risk. Management of large systems: collection of proceedings, 40: 49-82. — in Russ.

6. Sklovsky K. I. (2019) Political and legal aspects of theory of gift. Political and legal aspects of theory of gift. Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia, 3: 55–86. — in Russ.

7. Foucault M. (2003) Governmentality (the idea of state interest and its genesis). Logos, (4‒5): 4-22. https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2019-94-3-55-86 — in Russ.

8. Foucault M. (2011) Security. Territory. Population. A course of lectures given at the Collège de France in the 1977‒1978 academic year, transl. from french N. V. Suslova, A. V. Shestakova, V. Yu. Bystrova. St. Petersburg: Nauka. — in Russ.

9. Hume D. (1996) A Treatise of Human Nature. Works in two volumes. Vol. 1, M.: Thought. — in Russ.

10. Brown E. A.R. (1991) Philip V, Charles IV, and The Jews of France: The alleged expulsion of 1322. Speculum, 66 (2): 294-329. https://doi.org/10.2307/2864146

11. Burchell G. (1991) Peculiar Interests: Civil Society and Governing “The System of Natural Liberty”. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller (eds). The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality: with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press: 119-150.

12. Callon M., Latour B. (1981) Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Do Actors Macrostructure Reality. K. Knorr, A. Cicourel (eds). Advances in Social Theory and Methodology, London: Routledge: 277-303.

13. Castel R. (1991) From Dangerousness to Risk. G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds). The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality: with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press: 281-298.

14. Dyer O. (2020) Health ministers condemn novartis lottery for zolgensma, the world’s most expensive drug. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 368: m580. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m580

15. Ewald F. (1991) Insurance and Risk. G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds). The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality: with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press: 197-210.

16. Jacobs K., Travers M. (2015) Governmentality as critique: the diversification and regulation of the Australian housing sector. International Journal of Housing Policy, 15 (3): 304-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2015.1046209

17. Lemke T. (2016) Foucault, governmentality, and critique, New York: Routledge.

18. Lewis J. (2007). Graham T Allison’s “The Essence of Decision”. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 12 (2): 118-119. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581907780279576

19. MacIntyre A. C. (1988) Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

20. Nagashima M. (2019) “Hoken to risuku” (Furanshisu ewarudo-cho) o yomu — Sutadi kuesuchon mesoddo no kokoromi — sono 6 (kan): Dai 28 danraku kara dai 34 danraku: Hoken to kindai shakai [Reading “Insurance and Risk” — An Application of Study Question Method — Part6: From paragraph 28 to 34: Insurance and Society]. Kokusai kōhō media kankō-gaku jānaru, 29: 89-101.

21. O’Malley P. (2009) Governmentality and risk. Social theories of risk and uncertainty: An introduction, Sydney: The University of Sydney: 52-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444301489.ch3

22. Peters B., Pierre J. (2016). Decision–Making: The Essence of Governing. Comparative Governance. Rediscovering the Functional Dimension of Governing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 60-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316681725.004

23. Slovic P., Finucane M. L., Peters E., MacGregor D. G. (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24 (2): 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x

24. Standish C. D. (2000) The art of governing conduct: liberalism and the paradox of regulated freedom, Tasmania: University of Tasmania. https://eprints.utas.edu.au/21673/1/whole_StandishChristine2000_thesis.pdf

25. Stenström A. (2021) Plural Governmentalities: Governing Welfare Fraud in Sweden. British Journal of Criminology, 61 (3): 773-791. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa094

26. Walters W., Haahr J. H. (2005) Governmentality and political studies. European Political Science, 4 (3): 288-300. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210038