“They Seem to Exist, but Mostly Virtually so Far”: Representations of Diasporas on Migrant Digital Communication Platforms
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2022-4-227-246
Abstract
The article examines the representations of the “diaspora” in texts published on “migrant” digital communication platforms. With the help of discourse analysis The messages posted in open access in thematic groups in VKontakte, Odnoklassniki, and Telegram channels were studied. The purpose of the study was to find out what meanings and functions the users of these sites give the word “diasporas”. The “Diaspora” was considered as single framework. It was assumed that the “diaspora” does not have a clear, fixed content and various actors are trying to turn it from an “element” into a “moment”, securing a certain meaning for it. More than a thousand messages found on “migrant” sites were analyzed. The study showed that the “diaspora” within the considered digital platforms is most often mentioned in the reposts of press releases of state and public organizations, where it is presented as an object of social action, an intermediary between migrants and the state. In these texts, the “diaspora” is represented in the same semantic row with various state authorities and their representatives. At the same time, the “diaspora” is defined as a participant in events organized by the state bureaucracy of the host country or the donor country, the purpose of which is the manifestation of ethnicity. In user comments, these values are disputed: people either doubt its existence or its ability to effectively solve their problems.
Keywords
About the Author
D. O. TimoshkinRussian Federation
Dmitry O. Timoshkin
Irkutsk
Moscow
References
1. Bankovskaya S. (2002) Strangers and Borders: On the Concept of Social Marginality. Otechestvennye zapiski, 6: 457–467. — in Russ.
2. Van Dejk T. (2013) Discourse and Power, Moscow: Librokom: 344. — in Russ.
3. Weber M. (1990) Basic sociological concepts, Moscow: Progress: 808. — in Russ.
4. Vesnina L. (2009) Military Metaphor: Creating the Image of Migrants in Russian Mass Media. Cultural Linguistics, 3: 27–34. — in Russ.
5. Voronova O. (2016) The press of the modern Russian abroad: between the national and the global. Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki, 2(5): 278–292. — in 243 Russ.
6. De Serto M. (2013) Izobretenie povsednevnosti [The practice of everyday life], SPb, Izd-vo EU SPb: 330. — in Russ.
7. Djatlov V. (1994) Diaspora as a research problem, Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University publishing house: 315. — in Russ.
8. Djatlov V. (1999) Diaspora: an attempt to define the term and concept. Diaspory, 1: 8‒19. — in Russ.
9. Djatlov V. (2013) Labor migration and the process of forming diasporas in modern Russia. Migration processes and current issues of migration, 1: 731–734. — in Russ.
10. Djatlov V., Nam I. (2020) National-cultural organizations in the Siberian city: the problem of ethnic representation. Idei i idealy, 4(12): 473–491. — in Russ.
11. Jorgensen M., Phillips L. J. (2008) Discourse analysis. Theory and method, Kharkiv: Humanitarian Center: 60. — in Russ.
12. Kondratieva T. (2010) Diasporas in the modern world: the evolution of phenomena and concepts. Foundation for Historical Perspective. URL: http://www.perspektivy.info/print.php?ID=48886/ — in Russ.
13. Kurilov A. (2015) Structure and mechanisms of functioning of the news field. Vestnik RUDN, 4: 127–135. — in Russ.
14. Kuzheleva” of migrants-Sagan fromI., Gluhov Central A , AsiaBychkova: a virtual M ., networkGuzhova organization I. etc. (2016) , the“Digital discourse diasporas of an “imaginary community” and the competition of identities, Tomsk: Tomsk State University Press: 168. — in Russ.
15. Malahov V. (2004) Ethnization of the migration phenomenon in public discourse and institutions. Kosmopolis, 1(7): 56‒69. — in Russ.
16. Pronkina E. S. (2018) The paradox of privacy: why social media users disclose personal information in the public space. Bulletin of the Russian State University, 8: 155‒165. — in Russ.
17. Simon M. (2016) Voice of the subaltern: representations of otherness in musical practices of the black Atlantic. Logos, 4(26): 63–94. — in Russ.
18. ТToshhenko Zh., Chaptykova T. (1996) Diaspora kak objekt sociologicheskogo issledovanija [Diaspora as an object of sociological research]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija, 12: 33‒42. — in Russ.
19. Urri Dzh. (2012) Sociology beyond Societies, Moscow: VshJe: 336.
20. Fokanov Ju. (2008) Diaspora: on the issue of conceptualization of the concept in the context of globalization. Izvestija RGPU im. Gercena, 60: 284–289. — in Russ.
21. Shcherbakova E. Foreign labor force in Russia by the end of 2020. Demoscope Weekly. URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2021/0901/barom03.php. — in Russ.
22. Andersson K. (2019) Digital diasporas: an overview of the research areas of migration and new media through a narrative literature review. in Human Technology, Vol. 15. No. 2: 142–180.
23. Beneito-Montagut R. (2011) Ethnography Goes Online: Towards a User-Centred Methodology to Research Interpersonal Communication on the Internet. in Qualitive Research, Vol. 11. No. 6: 716–735.
24. Dekker R., Engbersen G. (2014) How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. in Global Networks, No. 14: 401–418. 245
25. Dekker R., Engbersen G., Klaver J. (2018) Smart Refugees: How Syrian Asylum Migrants Use Social Media Information in Migration Decision-Making. in Social media + Society, No. 4: 1‒11.
26. Hayness N., Wang X. (2019) Making migrant identities onsocial media: a tale of two neoliberal cities on the Pacific Rim. in Media, culture and society, 1‒10.
27. Komito, L. (2011) Social media and migration: Virtual community 2.0. in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, No. 62: 1075– 1086.
28. Machado I. (2014) Laclau and Mouffe’s Theory of Discourse and Hegemony: a Possible Approach to Law and its Integrity? ARSP, 3(100): 323‒335.
29. Paechter S. (2015) Researching sensitive issues online: Implications of a hybrid insider/outsider position in a retrospective ethnographic study. in Qualitative Research, Vol. 13. No. 1: 71–86.
30. Ponzanesi S. (2020) Digital Diasporas: Postcoloniality, Media and Affect. in International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, Vol. 22. No. 8: 977‒993.
31. van Meeteren M., Pereira S. (2018) Beyond the “Migrant Network”? Exploring Assistance Received in the Migration of Brazilians to Portugal and the Netherlands. in Journal of International Migration and Integration, Vol. 19. No. 4: 925–944.
Review
For citations:
Timoshkin D.O. “They Seem to Exist, but Mostly Virtually so Far”: Representations of Diasporas on Migrant Digital Communication Platforms. Sociology of Power. 2022;34(3-4):227-246. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2022-4-227-246