Labor and Power in the Russian Model of Platform Capitalism
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2022-4-128-155
Abstract
With the digitalization of the economy and society, varieties of “platform capitalism” appeared in the world. The article presents the first attempt at a critical understanding of the “gig economy” model that is taking shape in contemporary Russia. By problematizing the narratives that dominate foreign studies of platform employment, the author shows the embeddedness of platformization in the current economic system. Unlike countries with a developed market economy, labor platforms in Russia are part of giant platform ecosystems controlled by oligarchic businesses and the state, which, in the course of “creeping nationalization”, increases its influence through ownership and management structures. In key sectors of platform employment, quasi-monopolies are formed with the dominance of one company. In the context of geopolitical tensions, the process of “sovereignization” and the closure of the platform economy is being completed. Having successfully platformized informal labor markets in some sectors, platforms are becoming a tool for the legalization of employment in the hands of the state, driven primarily by fiscal interests. In Russia, a neoliberal model of regulation of the gig economy is being formed based on the legal introduction of the category of ‘self-employed’ in the absence of due attention to labor rights and the social protection of workers. With the strengthening of the authoritarian nature of the state, the possibilities of self-organization and collective defense of the interests of platform workers are blocked. The author concludes that in the Russian model of “platform capitalism”, the state enters an alliance with big capital and consumers against labor: the state strengthens control over the economy and tax revenues, large platform companies use labor at lower costs, and consumers receive cheap services through convenient digital services. The author calls for an integration of the issues of platform capitalism into broader discussions about the Russian model of socio-economic development.
About the Author
A. V. ShevchukRussian Federation
Andrey V. Shevchuk — Associate Professor, Department of Economic Sociology; Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Economic and Sociological Research (LESI)
Moscow
References
1. Bessonova O. E. (2006) Distribution economy of Russia: Evolution through transformations, M.: ROSSPEN. — in Russ.
2. Bizyukov P. V. (2021) Trajectory of development of post-Soviet trade unions: From tradition to alternative and back. Bulletin of public opinion. Data. Analysis. Discussions, 132 (1–2): 29‒61. — in Russ.
3. Bizyukov P. V. (2022) Do you need a new employment contract? Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 14 (3): 10–30. — in Russ.
4. Glinkina S. P. (2017) Post-socialist transformations in the light of discussions about the diversity of models of capitalism. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, (2), 5–22. — in Russ.
5. Gimpelson V. E., Kapelyushnikov R. I. (2013) Live “in the shadows” or die “in the light”: Informality in the Russian labor market. Voprosy ekonomiki, (11), 65–88. — in Russ.
6. Davydov D. A. (2022) The Dynamics of Mass Protest Actions in Modern Russia: An Event Analysis. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, (5): 72‒93. — in Russ.
7. Zuboff S. (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power, N.Y.: Public Affairs.
8. Kirdina S. G. (2014) Institutional matrices and development of Russia. Introduction to X-Y-theory, St. Petersburg: Nestor-History. — in Russ.
9. Kordonsky S. G. (2007). Resource State, M.: Regnum. — in Russ.
10. Korshunova T.Yu. (2020) Work based on Internet platforms: Is it possible to recognize labor relations? Jurisprudence Commentary, (26): 40–55. — in Russ.
11. Kosals L. (2006) Clan capitalism in Russia. Emergency Reserve, 6 (50). — in Russ.
12. Lyutov N. L., Voitkovskaya I. V. (2020) Taxi drivers doing work through online platforms: What are the legal implications of the “uberization” of labor? Actual Problems of Russian Law, 15 (6): 149–159. — in Russ.
13. Makarov E. I. (2022) Self-employment in Russia. Advantages and disadvantages identified during the pilot to introduce a tax on professional income in 2018‒2020, SPb: SPbGUP. — in Russ.
14. RSSU (2022) Platform economy as a tool to reduce sanctions risks for the Russian economy, M.: RSSU. — in Russ.
15. Sinyavskaya O. V., Biryukova S. S., Aptekar A. P., Gorvat E. S., Grishchenko N. B., Gudkova T. B., Kareva D. E. (2021) Platform Employment: Definition and Regulation, M.: NRU HSE. — in Russ.
16. Sinyavskaya O. V., Biryukova S. S., Gorvat E. S., Kareva D. E., Stuzhuk D. A., Chertenkov K. O. (2022) Platform employment in Russia: Scale, motives and barriers to 151 participation, M.: NRU HSE. — in Russ.
17. Srnicek N. (2019) Platform Capitalism, M.: HSE. — in Russ.
18. Stark D., Pais I. (2020) Algorithmic Management in the Platform. Economy Sociologica, 14 (3): 47–72.
19. Strebkov D. O. (2022) Platform employment and freelancing in an era of change. Sociodigger, 3 (10‒11): 29‒32. — in Russ.
20. Strebkov D. O., Shevchuk A. V. (2022) What do we know about freelancers? Sociology of free employment, M.: NRU HSE. — in Russ.
21. Fligstein N., Vogel S. (2020) Political Economy After Neoliberalism. Boston Review. (https://bostonreview.net/class-inequality/neilfligstein-steven-vogelpolitical-economy-afterneoliberalism)
22. Harvey D. (1989) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry Into the Origins of Cultural Change, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
23. CSR (2021) Forms of employment in the market of courier services, M.: SCR. (https://www.csr.ru/ru/publications/formy-zanyatosti-na-rynke-kurerskikh-uslug). — in Russ.
24. Chesalina O. V. (2022) The legal nature of platform employment. In S.Yu. Golovina, N. L. Lyutov (Eds.) Labor Law: National and International Dimension, Vol. 2, M.: Norma. — in Russ.
25. Shevchuk A. V. (2008) Models of Modern Capitalism: Fundamentals of Comparative Institutional Analysis. Journal of Economic Sociology, 9 (5): 17–29. — in Russ.
26. Shevchuk A. V. (2020) From Factory to Platform: Autonomy and Control in the Digital Economy. Sociology of Power, 32 (1): 30–54. — in Russ.
27. Shevchuk A. V., Chizhova D. A., Demina D. E., Chugunkova V. A. (2021) Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, (3): 356–381. — in Russ.
28. Yakovlev A. A. (2021) Competition of models of capitalism: Projection on Russia. Theoretical Economics, (4): 41–49. — in Russ.
29. Bessa I., Joyce S. (2022) A global analysis of worker protest in digital labour platforms. ILO Working Paper 70, Geneva: ILO.
30. Boudreau K. J., Hagiu A. (2009) Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. A. Gawer (Ed.) Platforms, markets and innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Boyer R. (2022) Platform capitalism: A socio-economic analysis. Socio-Economic Review, 20 (4): 1857‒1879.
31. Cant C. (2019) Riding for Deliveroo: Resistance in the New Economy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
32. De Stefano V. (2015) The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37 (3): 461–471.
33. Farrell H., Newman A. L. (2019) Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security, 44 (1): 42–79.
34. Ford M., Honan V. (2019) The limits of mutual aid: Emerging forms of collectivity among app-based transport workers in Indonesia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61 (4): 528–548.
35. Frey B. (2020) Platform labor and in/formality: Organization among motorcycle taxi drivers in Bandung, Indonesia. Anthropology of Work Review, 41(1): 36–49.
36. Graham M., Anwar M. A. (2019) The global gig economy: Towards a planetary labour market? First Monday, 24(4).
37. Hall J. V., Krueger A. B. (2018) An Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber’s Driver-Partners in the United States. ILR Review, 71(3): 705–732.
38. Irani L. (2015) The cultural work of microwork. New Media & Society, 17(5): 720–739.
39. Johnston H., Land-Kazlauskas C. (2019) Organizing on-demand representation, voice, and collective bargaining in the gig economy. ILO Working Papers, Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 94, Geneva: ILO.
40. Joyce S., Stuart M. (2021) Trade union responses to platform work: An evolving tension between mainstream and grassroots approaches. J. Drahokoupil, K. Vandaele (Eds.) A Modern Guide To Labour and the Platform Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 177–192.
41. Kenney M., Bearson D., Zysman J. (2021) The platform economy matures: Measuring pervasiveness and exploring power. Socio-Economic Review, 19 (4); 1451–1483.
42. Kenney M., Zysman J. (2016) The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and 153 Technology, 32 (3): 61–69.
43. Lehdonvirta V. (2022) Cloud Empires: How Digital Platforms Are Overtaking the State and How We Can Regain Control, MIT Press.
44. Lei Y. W. (2021) Delivering Solidarity: Platform Architecture and Collective Contention in China’s Platform Economy. American Sociological Review, 86 (2): 279–309.
45. McDonald P., Williams P., Mayes R. (2021) Means of control in the organization of digitally intermediated care work. Work, Employment and Society, 35 (5): 872–890.
46. Nölke A., May C. (2019) Liberal Versus Organised Capitalism: A Historical-Comparative Perspective. T. Gerőcs, M. Szanyi (Eds.) Market Liberalism and Economic Patriotism in the Capitalist World-System, Cham: Springer: 21–42.
47. Pesole A., Brancati U., Fernández-Macías E., Biagi F., González Vázquez I. (2018) Platform Workers in Europe. Evidence from the COLLEEM Survey, EUR29275 EN, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
48. Piasna A., Zwysen W., Drahokoupil J. (2022) The Platform Economy in Europe: Results from the Second ETUI Internet and Platform Work Survey (IPWS), Working paper 2022.05, Brussels: ETUI.
49. Plantin J. C., Lagoze C., Edwards P. N., Sandvig C. (2018) Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20 (1): 293–310.
50. Pollman E., Barry J. M. (2017) Regulatory Entrepreneurship. Southern California Law Review, 90 (3): 383–448.
51. Prassl J., Risak M. (2017) The Legal Protection of Crowdworkers: Four Avenues for Workers’ Rights in the Virtual Realm. P. Meil, V. Kirov (Eds.) Policy Implications of Virtual Work, Cham: Springer: 273–295.
52. Rahman K. S., Thelen K. (2019) The Rise of the Platform Business Model and the Transformation of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism. Politics & Society, 47 (2): 177– 204.
53. Randolph G., Galperin H., Khan L. (2019) New Opportunities in the Platform Economy: On-ramps to Formalization in the Global South. Just Job Network. (https://www.justjobsnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/T-20-Report-v3.pdf)
54. Rani U., Gobel N. (2022) Job instability, precarity, informality, and inequality: Labour in the gig economy. I. Ness (Ed.) The Routledge Handbook of the Gig Economy, NY: Routledge: 15‒32.
55. Rani U., Kumar Dhir R., Furrer M., Gőbel N., Moraiti A., Cooney S. (2021) World employment and social outlook: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work, Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
56. Rosenblat A. (2018) Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work, Oakland: University of California Press.
57. Rosenblat A., Stark L. (2016) Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers. International Journal of Communication, (10): 3758– 3784.
58. Schmitz L., Seidl T. (2022) Protecting, Transforming, and Projecting the Single Market. Open Strategic Autonomy and Digital Sovereignty in the EU’s Trade and Digital 154 Policies. SocArXiv. (https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/wjb64/)
59. Schor J. B., Attwood-Charles W., Cansoy M., Ladegaard I., Wengronowitz R. (2020) Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory and Society, 49 (5): 833–861. Szelényi I., Mihályi P. (2019) Varieties of post-communist capitalism: A comparative analysis of Russia, Eastern Europe and China, Leiden: Brill.
60. Thelen K. (2018) Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 16 (4): 938–953.
61. Uzunca B., Rigtering J. C., Ozcan P. (2018) Sharing and shaping: A cross-country comparison of how sharing economy firms shape their institutional environment to gain legitimacy. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4 (3): 248–272.
62. Vallas S., Schor J. B. (2020) What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46 (1): 273–294.
63. Weber C. E., Okraku M., Mair J., Maurer I. (2021) Steering the transition from informal to formal service provision: Labor platforms in emerging-market countries. Socio-Economic Review, 19 (4): 1315–1344.
64. Witte K. (2018) Self-exploitation or working time autonomy? Yandex Taxi drivers in Moscow. DOC Research Institute. (https://doc-research.org/2018/10/self-exploitationwork-autonomy-yandex-taxi-drivers-moscow)
65. Wood A. J., Graham M., Lehdonvirta V., Hjorth I. (2019) Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33 (1): 56–75.
66. Woodcock J., Graham M. (2020) The gig economy: A critical introduction, Cambridge: Polity.
Review
For citations:
Shevchuk A.V. Labor and Power in the Russian Model of Platform Capitalism. Sociology of Power. 2022;34(3-4):128-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2022-4-128-155