Life, Death, and the Political: Existential Foundations of Thomas Hobbes’s and Carl Schmitt’s Teachings

The political teachings of Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt imply fundamental ontological structures that reflect the processes of the genesis, assertion, and destruction of political being. The article investigates similarities and differences between these political projects. The approach applied by the author is marked by a reliance on the theoretical analysis of the Leviathan’s frontispiece and by employing the conceptual framework of Giorgio Agamben’s Homo sacer project. The application of these theoretical optics helps to evaluate the political significance of the present people (the people composed of living human beings) in Hobbes’s and Schmitt’s contexts and to detect the notable difference between the two projects. The article highlights that political existence presupposes the total depoliticization of the present people in the framework of Hobbes’s philosophy. It is argued that the security of the present people’s life becomes an underlying condition for the mentioned construction (and is therefore ontologically significant). The provision of security potentially saves the sovereign’s own life and guarantees recognition by the subjects. An investigation of Schmitt’s teaching reveals the political significance of the present people. Since — according to Schmitt — political will is understood only in the context of political enmity (the necessary “horizon” of which is armed confrontation), it is concluded that the political significance of the present people is closely associated with its members’ readiness to die in the war. Due to the fact that political existence is generated through the decision on the public enemy (in which the present people might be involved via acclamation procedures), the resoluteness toward death that underlies this decision must be considered as the key factor of Carl Schmitt’s political ontology. In light of this statement, it is argued that the project of Martin Heidegger’s Being and Time could be considered as Carl Schmitt’s “unwritten” ontology of the individual being. 

1. Agamben G. (2011a) Homo Sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life, M.: Publishing House “Europe”. — in Russ.

2. Agamben G. (2011b) Homo Sacer. State of Exception, M.: Publishing House “Europe”. — in Russ.

3. Agamben G. (2021) Stasis: Civil War as a Political Paradigm. Homo sacer II, 2, SPb.: Vladimir Dal’. — in Russ.

4. Bashkov V. (2021) Repetition of the Political. Søren Kierkegaard and Carl Schmitt, SPb.: Vladimir Dal’. — in Russ.

5. Hobbes T. (1989a) On the Citizen. Writings in 2 Volumes. Vol. 1, M.: Thought: 270– 506. — in Russ.

6. Hobbes T. (1989b) Leviathan. Writings in 2 Volumes. Vol. 2, M.: Thought. — in Russ.

7. Žižek S. (2014) The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology, M.: Publishing House “Delo” RANEPA. — in Russ.

8. Löwith K. (2012) Political Decisionism, Logos, 5 (89): 115–142. — in Russ.

9. Marey A. (2020) “People” in the Political Thought of European Modernity: Hobbes, Spinoza, Pufendorf, Slovo.ru: Baltic Accent, 11 (3): 8–24. — in Russ.

10. Tretyak A., Tinus N. (2019) The Political logic of “Multitudo” in the Works of Hobbes and Spinoza. Politia, 95 (4): 6–24. — in Russ.

11. Faye F. (2021) Heidegger: The Introduction of Nazism into Philosophy in Light of the Unpublished Seminars of 1933–1935, M.: Publishing House “Delo” RANEPA. — in Russ.

12. Filippov A. (2006) The Critique of Leviathan. Schmitt C. The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol, SPb.: Vladimir Dal’: 5–100. — in Russ.

13. Filippov A. (2009) Actuality of the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. The second article. Politia, 55 (4): 141–157. — in Russ.

14. Хабибулин Т. (2020) Спасение традиции. О методологии политико-правового проекта Джорджо Агамбена. Khabibulin T. (2020) Rescue of the Tradition. On the Methodology of Political and Legal Project of Giorgio Agamben. Works by the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 15 (4): 127–150. — in Russ.

15. Heidegger M. (1995) The Self-Assertion of the German University. Yearbook of History of Philosophy. 1994, M.: Science: 298–304.

16. Heidegger M. (2015) Being and Time. M.: Academic Project. — in Russ. Шмитт К. (2016a). Римский католицизм и политическая форма.

17. Schmitt C. Roman Catholicism and Political Form. Schmitt C. The Concept of the Political, SPb.: Science: 60–92. — in Russ.

18. Schmitt C. The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol, SPb.: Vladimir Dal’. — in Russ.

19. ШSchmitt C. Theory of the Partisan, M.: Praxis. — in Russ. 99

20. Schmitt C. The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, SPb.: Vladimir Dal’. — in Russ.

21. Schmitt C. (2010) Constitutional Theory (fragment). Schmitt C. The State and Political Form, M.: HSE: 33–236. — in Russ.

22. Schmitt C. (2016b) The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Schmitt C. The Concept of the Political, SPb.: Science: 93–170. — in Russ.

23. Schmitt C. (2016c) The Concept of the Political. Schmitt C. The Concept of the Political, SPb.: Science: 280–356. — in Russ.

24. Schmitt C. (2016c) Political Theology. Schmitt C. The Concept of the Political, SPb.: Science: 5–59. — in Russ.

25. Abbott M. (2012) No life is bare, the ordinary is exceptional: Giorgio Agamben and the question of political ontology. Parrhesia, 14 (2012): 23–36.

26. Altini C. (2010) “Potentia’as “potestas”. An interpretation of modern politics between Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt. Philosophy & social criticism, 36 (2): 231–252. Bussolini J. (2011) Ongoing Founding Events in Carl Schmitt and Giorgio Agamben. Telos, 157 (Winter 2011): 60–82.

27. Harries K. (1976) Heidegger as a Political Thinker. The Review of Metaphysics, 29 (4): 642–669.

28. Holmes S. (2010) Does Hobbes have a concept of enemy? Tralau J. (ed.) Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt. The Politics of Order and Myth, London and New York: Routledge: 113–132.

29. Kelly D. (2014) Carl Schmitt’s political theory of representation. Journal of the History of Ideas, 65 (1): 113–134.

30. Kristiansson M., Tralau J. (2014) Hobbes’s hidden monster: A new interpretation of the frontispiece of Leviathan. European Journal of Political Theory, 13 (3): 299–320.

31. Marder M. (2010). Groundless Existence: The Political Ontology of Carl Schmitt, London and New York: Continuum.

32. Marder M. (2014) The Question of Political Existence: Hegel, Heidegger, Schmitt. P. Trawny, M. Sá Cavalcante Schuback, M. Marder (eds) On Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. The 1934–35 Seminar and Interpretative Essays, New York: Bloomsbury Academic: 37–48.

33. McCormick J. P. (2016) Teaching in Vain: Carl Schmitt, Thomas Hobbes, and the Theory of the Sovereign State. Meierhenrich J., Simons O. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt, New York: Oxford University Press: 269–290.

34. Olsthoorn J. (2015) Why justice and injustice have no place outside the Hobbesian State. European Journal of Political Theory, 14 (1): 19–36.

35. Radloff B. (2005) Heidegger and Carl Schmitt: The Historicity of the Political: Part Two. Heidegger Studies, 21 (2005): 75–94.

36. Radloff B. (2008) Machination and the Political in Heidegger’s “Mindfulness”, Heidegger Studies, 24 (2008): 145–166.

37. Schmitt C. (2014) Volksentscheid und Volksbegehren. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

38. Skinner Q. (2022) Bridge between Art and Philosophy: The Case of Thomas Hobbes. European Review, 30 (5): 627–638.

39. Slomp G. (2010) The liberal slip of Thomas Hobbes’s authoritarian pen. Tralau J. (ed.) Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt. The Politics of Order and Myth, London and New York: Routledge: 99–112.

40. Stanton T. (2011) Hobbes and Schmitt. History of European Ideas, 37 (2): 160–167. Thomsen J. A. (1997) Carl Schmitt — The Hobbesian of the 20th Century? Social Thought & Research, 20 (1/2): 5–28.

41. Tralau J. (2010) Thomas Hobbes, Carl Schmitt, and three conceptions of politics. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13 (2–3): 261–274.

42. Vaughan-Williams N. (2016) Carl Schmitt, Giorgio Agamben and the “nomos” of contemporary political life. S. Prozorov, S. Rentea (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Biopolitics, London and New York: Routledge: 140–154.

43. Wolin R. (1990) The Politics of Being, New York and Oxford: Columbia University Press.

44. Wolin R. (1990b) Carl Schmitt, Political Existentialism, and the Total State. Theory and Society, 19 (4): 389–416.

45. Wolin R. (1992) Carl Schmitt: The Conservative Revolutionary Habitus and the Aesthetics of Horror. Political Theory, 20 (3): 424–447.

46. Zaffini S. (2020) Real Unity and Representation in Hobbes, Schmitt, and Barth. Polity, 52(1): 35–63.