Political Reaction as Passive Revolution: Attempting a Conceptualization
EDN: OHFOIP
Abstract
This article investigates the phenomenon of political reaction - a topic that has rarely been the subject of systematic study. Political reaction is described here in the context of its brief historical and conceptual genealogy. The history of the concept of "reaction” and its inclusion in the political vocabulary dates back to the events of the French Revolution and the Enlightenment. This explains why there is a genetic relation between both reaction and progressivism and between reaction and revolution. The author distinguishes two typical approaches to the concept of political reaction and its application: historico-chronological and discursive. Examples that illustrate the usage of these approaches reveal various political attitudes which can be described as "reactionary”, and serve as a basis for the analysis of their ideological and conceptual content. According to the historico-chronological approach, political reaction is understood as a reflex phenomenon that is a direct consequence of revolutionary change or reform; this reflex is represented by an attempt at restoring the order that preceded its transformation. According to the discursive approach, political reaction can be understood as negative (negation of change) or affirmative (assertion of the socio-political attitudes that were discredited). The article demonstrates that the rejection of change is neither the necessary condition nor the principle of a reactionary regime or rhetoric. Since the two presented approaches are limited and do not take into account a variety of factors determining reaction as a complex phenomenon of social and political life, the article offers an alternative approach to its conceptualization. A key principle of political reaction consists in the protection of order which defines the character of social change and limits political participation in the process of this change. Political reaction is conditioned by political and socio-economic challenges, which demands the transformation of the dominant social order for the sake of its reinforcement. In this context, political reaction is defined as a "passive revolution” within the framework offered by Antonio Gramsci for describing modernization that aims at preserving the hegemony of the elites and the appropriation of popular demand for social and political change.
About the Author
Marina A. SimakovaRussian Federation
Research assistant, Department of Sociology and
Philosophy
References
1. Arendt H. (2011) O revoliutsii. [On Revolution], М.: Еvropa.
2. Betz H.G. (1994) Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Buci-Glucksmann C. (1980) Gramsci and the State. Translated by D. Fernbach. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
4. Callinicos A. (2010) The Limits of Passive Revolution. Capital & Class, 34 (3): 491-507.
5. Chicherin B. (1896) Kurs gosudarstvennoi nauki. V 3 ch. Ch. 2. Sotsiologiia. [The Course of State Science. In 3 vols. Vol. 2. Sociology], Moscow.
6. Chryssogelos, A. (2015) Reaction and Adaptation in the Longue Durée: The Far-Right, International Politics and the State in Historical Perspective. R. Saull, A. Anievas,N. Davidson, & A. Fabry (eds) The Longue Durée of the Far-Right: An International Historical Sociology, Abingdon and New York: Routhledge: 85-105.
7. Compagnon A. (2005) Les antimodernes: de Joseph de Maistre à Roland Barthes, Paris:
8. Gallimard.
9. Constant B. (2002 [1797]) De la force du gouvernement. Des réactions politiques. Des effets de la Terreuractuel de la France & de la nécessité de s’y rallier, Paris: Éditions du Boucher.
10. Gingrich M. and M. Banks (eds) (2006) Neo-nationalism in Europe and Beyond, London: Berghahn Books.
11. Gramsci A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, translated and edited by Q. Hoare and G. N. Smith, New York: International Publishers.
12. Gramsci A. (1995) Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks, translated and edited by. D. Boothman, Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
13. Hanson R. (2013) Shall We Vote on Values, But Bet on Beliefs? Journal of Political Philosophy, 21 (2): 151-178.
14. Hardt M., Mezzadra S. (2017) October! To Commemorate the Future. South Atlantic Quaterly, 116 (4): 649-668.
15. Herf J. (1984) Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Herf J. (1996) Reactionary Modernism Reconsidered: Modernity, the West and the
17. Nazis. Z. Sternhell (eds) The Intellectual Revolt against Liberal Democracy, 1870–1945,Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities: 131-158.
18. Hirschman A. (2010) Ritorika reaktsii: izvrashchenie, tshchetnost’, opasnost’. [The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy], Moscow: Izd. Dom Gos. un-ta — Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki.
19. Hobsbawm E. (2004) Epokha krainostei: korotkii dvadtsatyi vek (1914–1991). [The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914-1991], Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Nezavisimaia Gazeta.
20. Land N. (2014) Hyper-racism, https://alternativeright.blog/2014/10/04/hyper-racism/
21. Mandel E. (1989) The Marxist Case for Revolution Today, https://www.marxists.org/archive/mandel/1989/xx/rev-today.htm
22. Moldbug M. (2007a) Neocameralism and The Escalator of Massarchy, https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2007/12/neocameralism-and-escalator-of/
23. Moldbug M. (2007b) Why am I not a Libertarian, https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2007/12/why-i-am-not-libertarian/
24. Moldbug M. (2008) An Open Letter to Open-Minded Progressives: Chapter 3: The Jacobite
25. History of the World, https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2008/05/ol3-jacobitehistory-of-world/
26. Moler A. (2017) Konservativnaia revoliutsiia v Germanii 1918-1932. [The Conservative Revolution in Germany in 1918-1932], Moscow: Totenburg.
27. Robin C. (2018) The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump, New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Rydgren J. (2005) Movements of Exclusion: Radical Right-wing Populism in the Western World, New York: Nova Science.
29. Seldes G. (1943) Facts and Fascism, New York: In Fact.
30. Starobinski J. (2008) Deistvie i reaktsiia: zhizn’ i prikliuchenie odnoi pary. [Action and Reaction: The Life and Adventures of a Couple], Saint-Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’.
31. Thomas P.D. (2006) Modernity as “passive revolution”: Gramsci and the Fundamental Concepts of Historical Materialism. Journal of the Canadian Historical Association (CHA), New Series, 17 (2): 61-78.
32. Virno P., Kayndl K., Sunshine S. (2011) Tri teksta o novom fashizme. [Three Texts on New Fascism], M: Svobodnoe marksistskoe izdatel’stvo.
33. Welsh J.F. (2010) Max Stirner’s Dialectical Egoism: A New Interpretation, Lanham:
34. Lexington Books.
35. Wodak R. (2018) Politika strakha. Chto znachit diskurs pravykh populistov? [The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean], Kharkov: Izdatel’stvo “Gumanitarnyi
36. Tsentr”.
Review
For citations:
Simakova M.A. Political Reaction as Passive Revolution: Attempting a Conceptualization. Sociology of Power. 2018;30(2):47-68. (In Russ.) EDN: OHFOIP