A Content Analysis of the Mentions of Barriers to the Dissemination of Information Technologies in Russian Print Media
EDN: VKPLON
Abstract
This article presents the results of a content analysis of articles in Russian print media devoted to the topic of information technology. Specifically, the authors focus on analyzing the topic of the barriers (risks, threats) mentioned in these articles. The results of the research show that 43% of the sampled articles contain references to barriers that seem surprising in light of the techno-optimistic attitudes, which - as noted by other researchers - are widespread in Russia. The authors of the article show that the mention of barriers in the media is linked to the spheres of security, entertainment and communication, and that these barriers are generally portrayed as legal and political problems. Most frequently, barriers are expressed regarding the relations between the state and the private sector, as well as between Russian and foreign countries and companies. As for the foreign experience, content analysis shows an ambiguity in the development of the image of the IT sector in this context: other countries are portrayed as both a threat to information sovereignty and as role models to be followed. The article concludes with three models (the diffusion model, education model and governmentality model) to explain how and why IT barriers are presented in the Russian media.
Keywords
About the Authors
Olga S. LogunovaRussian Federation
PhD, Associate Professor at the Sociological Department
Nikolay I. Rudenko
Russian Federation
PhD, Senior Research Fellow
References
1. Aptekman A. i dr. (2017) Cifrovaja Rossija: novaja real’nost’ [Digital Russia: the new reality]. M.: Mak-Kinzi i Kompanija SiAjJes.
2. Gusenko M. (2017) Cifry prezhde bukvarja [Digits before ABC-book]. Rossijskaja gazeta (https://rg.ru/2017/08/21/programmirovaniiu-nado-uchit-detej-ranshe-chem-azbuke.html)
3. Jurchenko V. (2017) Berut li roboty v bitkoinah? [Whether do robots take a bribe in bitkoins?]Novaja gazeta (https://www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2017/11/14/74545-berut-liroboty-v-bitkoinah)
4. Kolomychenko M. (2017) “Zakonodatel’noe regulirovanie vsegda otstaet i budet otstavat’ ot tehnologij” [Legislative regulation is always behind and will lag behind
5. technology]. Kommersant (https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3331543)
6. Latur B. (2013) Nauka v dejstvii. Sleduja za uchenymi i inzhenerami vnutri obshhestva. [Science in Action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society] SPb.: Izdatel’stvo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge.
7. Programma “Cifrovaja jekonomika Rossijskoj Federacii” [Digital economics of the Russian
8. Federation] (http://static.government.ru/media/files/9gFM4FHj4PsB79I5v7yLVuPgu4bvR7M0.pdf
9. Rudenko N., Bekreev A. (2018) Rossijskoe programmnoe obespechenie: diskursivnoe konstruirovanie tehnologicheskoj politiki v diskurse oficial’nyh lic [Russian Software: Discursive Strategies for the Framing of the Technology Policy in the Discourse of the Official Authorities]// Zhurnal sociologii i social’noj antropologii (v pechati).
10. Toganova N. V. i dr. (2016) Tehnologii i innovacii v rossijskih SMI [Technpologies and innovations in the Russia media]. Innovacii, 10 (216): 110-118.
11. Shirjaev V. (2017) Ne vnedrjat’ zhe blokchejn v dobychu nefti [Should we implement blockchain in the old production]? Novaja Gazeta (https://www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2017/06/30/72973-ne-vnedryat-zhe-blokcheyn-v-dobychu-nefti).
12. Scheufele D.A. (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1): 103–122.
13. Stilgoe J. (2017) Machine learning, social learning and the governance of self-driving
14. cars. Social Studies of Science, 48: 25-56.
15. Vakhshtayn V., Stepancov P., Chursina Ju., Bardina S. Publichnyj otchet po rezul’tatam sociologicheskogo issledovanija povedencheskih i institucional’nyh predposylok tehnologicheskogo razvitija regionov RF. MVShSJeN, 2016 (https://www.rvc.ru/upload/iblock/d10/attitudes_to_technologies_and_innovations_in_Russia.pdf)
16. Wynne B. (1992) Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public understanding of science, 1 (3): 281-304
Review
For citations:
Logunova O.S., Rudenko N.I. A Content Analysis of the Mentions of Barriers to the Dissemination of Information Technologies in Russian Print Media. Sociology of Power. 2018;30(3):127-143. (In Russ.) EDN: VKPLON