Preview

Sociology of Power

Advanced search

Intergenerational Relations and Social Transformations: The Case of North Caucasus

EDN: VZMMJW

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the role of intergenerational relations and intergenerational conflict in social transformation. The example of the Northern Caucasus is used for this research. The analysis is built on the separation of the two forms of intergenerational conflict: conflict based on the life cycle stages and conflict based on the generation gap. The latter is especially important for understanding the mechanisms of social transformation. The article demonstrates that a generation gap can either lead to the evolution of intergenerational relations-and the step-by-step emancipation of the youth-or generate acute intergenerational conflict. The conflict intervenes in the dynamic of intergenerational relations, mostly in the situation of rapid social transformation, ideological pluralism and the youth's protest potential. For the youth, radical ideologies act as pillars against existing norms and the superiority of elders that was implanted during the early process of socialization. In the Northern Caucasus, Islamic fundamentalism had played the role of such an ideology. It was the language and the way of legitimation of intergenerational conflict. It denied the undoubted value of relying on the ancestral experience and considered the authority of knowledge as more important than the authority of ages. This mechanism of intergenerational conflict questioned the very basis of traditional culture. On the one hand, it widened the possibilities for the youth's adaptation to the new conditions, contributed to the development of individualism and critical thinking. However, on the other hand, intergenerational conflict in such forms led to youth radicalization and the spread of violent practices.

About the Authors

Ирина Стародубровская
Институт экономической политики им. Е.Т. Гайдара
Russian Federation


Irina V. Starodubrovskaya
Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy
Russian Federation

Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Head of the Department of Political Economy and Regional Development 



References

1. Armstrong K. (2013) Battle for God: the history of fundamentalism, Moscow: Al’pina non-fikshn.—in Russ.

2. Bocharov V.V. (2001) Тhe Antropogy of Age, St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Publishing House.—in Russ.

3. Garb P. (1984) Long-livers, Moscow: Progress.—in Russ.

4. Inglehart R., Welzel Ch. (2011) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy, Moscow: Novoye izdatelstvo.—in Russ.

5. Karpov Yu.Yu. (1996) A Horseman and a Wolf. Male Societies in Socio-Cultural tradition of Caucasus Highlanders, St. Petersburg: MAYE RAN.—in Russ.

6. Mead M. (1988) Culture and Commitment: A Study of the Generation Gap. Culture and the World of Childhood, Moscow: Nauka.—in Russ.

7. Pavlova O.S. (2012) Ingush Ethnic Group on the Current Stage: Socio-Psychological Portrait Features, Moscow: Forum.—in Russ.

8. Roy O. (2018) Globalized Islam. The Search for a New Ummah, Moscow: Mardjani Fund.—in Russ.

9. Smirnova Ya.S. (1983) Family and Family Life of the Northern Caucasus Peoples (second part of XIX-XX centures, Moscow: Nauka.—in Russ.

10. Starodubrovskaya I. (2017) Islamic Reformation: the Heuristic Value of the Approach Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom. [State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide], 3(35): 11-50.—in Russ.

11. Tennis F. (2002) Community and Society, St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’.—in Russ.

12. Aart C. Bontekoning (2011) The Evolutionary Power of New Generations: Generations as Key Players in the Evolution of Social Systems. Psychology Research, 1 (4): 287-301.

13. Eisenstadt S.N. (1973) Tradition, Change, and Modernity, N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons.

14. Foner N. (1984) Ages in Conflict. A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Inequality between Old and Young, N.Y.: Columbia University Press.

15. Mannheim K. (2012) Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul LTD.

16. Roy O. (1994) The Failure of Political Islam, Cambridge; Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

17. Redfield R. (1947) The Folk Society. The American Journal of Sociology, LII (4), January: 293-308.

18. Spitzer A.B. (1973) The Historical Problem of Generations. The American Historical Review, 78 (5): 1353-1385.

19. Strauss W., Howe N. (1991). Generations; the history of America's Future 1584 to 2069, N.Y.: William Morrow.

20. Strauss W., Howe N. (1998). The fourth turning, N.Y.: Broadway Books.


Review

For citations:


 , Starodubrovskaya I.V. Intergenerational Relations and Social Transformations: The Case of North Caucasus. Sociology of Power. 2019;31(1):92-113. (In Russ.) EDN: VZMMJW

Views: 1


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0492 (Print)
ISSN 2413-144X (Online)