Preview

Sociology of Power

Advanced search

Generations Instead of Classes? Age and the Consumer Revolution in Russia

EDN: ZDDCZN

Abstract

This paper argues that consumption patterns and lifestyles, which—in the Western-European and the US contexts—mark the boundaries of the uppermiddle class, demonstrate a much stronger affinity with the boundaries of the younger age cohorts in Russia. Using the results of a representative survey carried out between April and May 2017 in Saint Petersburg, Russia, we apply multiple correspondence analysis to demonstrate that the observed consumption patterns are best described by a two-dimensional structure, one axis of which describes the total level of (in)activity, while the other axis stands for the relative amount of cultural capital. Counter to what one might expect on the basis of international stratification and consumption studies, however, age—rather than occupation, education or income—is the strongest predictor of overall participation, explaining around 38% of the variance. Using the results of a series of regular cultural consumption surveys available since 2011, we argue that age should be interpreted as belonging to a certain generation—rather than a certain passing stage of a lifecycle—as generations retained the same level of activity across the time span of 12 years. In the last part of the article we interpret these differences as being the result of an exposure to Western status culture at different stages of one’s biography, making younger people the most receptive to its omnivorous affirmation of multi-faceted activity.

About the Authors

Михаил Соколов
Европейский университет в Санкт-Петербурге
Russian Federation


Mikhail M. Sokolov
European University at Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation

Professor



References

1. Belokonnaya L.А., Gimpel’son V.E., Gorbacheva T.L., Kapelyushnikov R.I., Luk’yanova

2. А.L., Zhikhareva O.B. (2007) Shaping Wages: The Impact of Occupations. Voprosy ekonomiki,

3. : 52–74.—in Russ.

4. Ille M.E. (2016) Participation of residents of the “cultural capital” in the cultural life of St.

5. Petersburg. Teleskop: zhurnal sotsiologicheskikh i marketingovykh issledovanij, 5: 27–32.—in

6. Russ.

7. Ille M.E. (2017) The Image of an Ideal Saint Peterburgian and the Cultural Life of the City.

8. Teleskop: zhurnal sotsiologicheskikh i marketingovykh issledovanij, 4: 32–42.—in Russ.

9. Ille M.E., Sokolov M.M. (2018) Status Culture in the Times of Economic Transformation.

10. Cultural Participation in Saint Petersburg, 1991-2011. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia], 1: 159–

11. —in Russ.

12. Kalinin K. (2011) Socio-professional cleavages in Russia (1992-2007). Theory, methodology,

13. measurement. Monitoring obschestvennogo mnenija: Sotsial’nye i ekonomicheskie peremeny

14. [Public opinion monitor: economic and social changes], 101 (1): 24-43.—in Russ.

15. Lepele V., Agafonov Yu. (2016) The “Golden Doors” to Russian Business Elite: the

16. Recruitment Process and the Structural Transformation of Large-scale Business in Post-Soviet

17. Russia. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia], 25 (3): 97-125.—in Russ.

18. Radaev V.V. (2018) Millenials in the context of earlier generations: An empirical analysis.

19. Sotsiologicheskie issledovanija [Sociological Research], 3: 15-33.—in Russ.

20. Sokolov M., Safonova M., Sokolova N. (2016) Status cultures, biographic cycles, and

21. generational changes in literary tastes. An analysis of a database covering all users of Saint

22. Petersburg public libraries system in 2014 Zhurnal sociologii i social’noj antropologii. [The

23. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 3: 116-135.—in Russ.

24. Sokolov M., Kazantsev A. (2017) Survey types, sample biases, and the effects of demographic

25. quotas. The results of an experiment with a three-frame survey in a major Russian city.

26. Еkonomicheskaja sociologija [Economic sociology], 18 (5): 87- 110.—in Russ.

27. Arkes H., Blumer C. (1985) The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and

28. Human Decision Processes, 35: 124-140.

29. Becker H.S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology,

30. (1): 32-40.

31. Bihagen E., Lambert P. (2018). Can class and status really be disentangled? Research in

32. Social Stratification and Mobility, 58: 1-10.

33. Bleichrodt H., Wakker P. (2015) Regret theory: A bold alternative to the alternatives. The

34. Economic Journal, 125: 493-532.

35. Bourdieu P. (1984) Distinction: The Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, London:

36. Routledge/Kegan Paul.

37. Brockner J. (1992) The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward

38. theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17 (1): 39-61.

39. Chan T.W., Goldthorpe J.H. (2004) Is There a Status Order in Contemporary British

40. Society? Evidence from the Occupational Structure of Friendship. European Sociological

41. Review, 20 (5): 383-401.

42. Chan T.W., Goldthorpe J.H. (2007) Class and Status: The Conceptual Distinction and Its

43. Empirical Relevance. American Sociological Review, 72 (4): 512-532.

44. DiMaggio P., Mohr J. (1985) Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment, and Marital

45. Selection. American Journal of Sociology, 90 (6): 1231-1257.

46. DiMaggio P., Mohr J. (1995) The Intergenerational Transmission of Cultural Capital.

47. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 14: 167-199.

48. Erickson B.H. (1996) Culture, class, and connections. American Journal of Sociology, 102

49. (1): 217-251.

50. Flemmen M., Jarnes V., Rosenlund L. (2018) Social space and cultural class divisions: the

51. forms of capital and contemporary lifestyle differentiation. The British Journal of Sociology, 69

52. (1): 124-153.

53. Gayo Cal M., Savage M., Warde A. (2006) A cultural map of the United Kingdom, 2003

54. Cultural Trends, 15 (2-3): 213-237.

55. Goffman E. (1951) Symbols of Class Status. British Journal of Sociology, 11: 294-304.

56. Goffman E. (1989) On fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18 (2): 123-132.

57. Holt D.B. (1998) Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption? Journal of

58. Consumer Research, 25: 1-25.

59. Lizardo O. (2006) How cultural tastes shape personal networks. American Sociological

60. Review, 71 (5): 778-807.

61. Lizardo O. (2014) Omnivorousness as the bridging of cultural holes: A measurement

62. strategy. Theory and Society, 43 (3-4): 395-419.

63. Lizardo O. (2016). Why "cultural matter" matter: Culture talk as the mobilization of cultural

64. capital in interaction. Poetics, 58: 1-17.

65. Peterson R. (1992) Understanding audience segmentation, from elite and mass to omnivore

66. and univore. Poetics, 21 (4), 243-258.

67. Putnam R.D. (2001) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New

68. York: Simon and Schuster.

69. Pyysiäinen J., Ryynänen M. (2018) Downplaying class with style: Middle class anxiety and

70. the aesthetic performance of role distance. Poetics. (10.1016/). poetic.2018.10.001).

71. Rasborg K. (2017) From class society to the individualized society? A critical reassessment

72. of individualization and class. Irish Journal of Sociology, 25 (3): 229-249.

73. Roose H., van Eijck K., Lievens J. (2012). Culture of distinction or culture of openness?

74. Using a social space approach to analyze the social structuring of lifestyles. Poetics, 40 (6): 491-

75.

76. Shils E. (1965) Charisma, Order and Status. American Sociological Review, 30 (2): 199-21

77. Sokolov M. (2018) Cultural capital and social revolution. Arts consumption in a major

78. Russian city, 1991-2017. Poetics (https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.poetic.2018.10.005).

79. Veblen T. (2017 [1899]) The Theory of the Leisure Class, Routledge.


Review

For citations:


 , Sokolov M.M. Generations Instead of Classes? Age and the Consumer Revolution in Russia. Sociology of Power. 2019;31(1):71-91. (In Russ.) EDN: ZDDCZN

Views: 1


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0492 (Print)
ISSN 2413-144X (Online)