Discrete Present, Continuous past, and Active Future of the Labor Market in Khakassia
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of perceptions of the labor market by employers and civil servants responsible for solving personnel problems in the region. Based on the reconstruction of the narrative within expert interviews conducted in 2024 in the Republic of Khakassia, three components of the conversation about the personnel shortage are identified: discrete present, continuous past, and active future. The discrete present describes the situation of personnel shortage, which is recognized by all informants; the continuous past reveals the complex of reasons that caused the shortage; the active future contains forecasts and sets of necessary actions to overcome it. It is concluded that one of the most urgent solutions is the normative consolidation of space for economic entities and government officials at the regional level to implement their actorship. Only by encouraging the initiative of regional actors in developing solutions to personnel problems, the criticality of incoming orders, autonomy in their implementation while maintaining responsibility does it become possible to take into account regional specifics and most effectively adapt general directives to local conditions. Interviews with regional employees reflect their agentic perception by federal officials, who often treat regional officials exclusively as executors — but not as equal colleagues capable and willing to use knowledge of the regional context to adjust unified directives coming from above. In reality, we observe a constant alternation of the modes of “agency” and “actorship” among the same leaders, and it is the proactive activity of regional officials in developing measures of state support for employers and personnel policy, adaptation, and nuanced orders depending on regional specifics that becomes the key to their success.
About the Authors
D. M. RogozinRussian Federation
Dmitry M. Rogozin — Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Head of the Laboratory for Field Research, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of Russian Federation (RANEPA); Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Moscow
A. A. Chentsova
Russian Federation
Alexandra A. Chentsova — Junior Researcher, the Laboratory for Field Research, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of Russian Federation (RANEPA).
Moscow
References
1. Aksyonova O. V. (2023). Dialectics of social action: Toward a methodology for studying the transformation of subjectivity. In M. K. Gorskov (Ed.), Reforming Russia: Yearbook. Vol. 21 (pp. 122–149). FNISC RAS. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.19181/ezheg.2023.5
2. Balatsiuk E. S., & Kresnikova E. V. (2024). Work values in the generational aspect on the example of younger Millennials of Saint Petersburg. Inter, 16(2): 50–68. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.2.3
3. Veselkova N. V., & Pryamikova E. V. (2024). The state of post-industriality: The “power of factories”. Inter, 16(3): 10–32. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.3.1
4. Zoidov K. Kh., Urunov A. A., Bogatyrev S. I., & Ostapenko V. A. (2024). Labor shortage: A comparative analysis in Russia and abroad. Regional Issues of Economic Transformation, 6: 164–172. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.26726/1812-7096-2024-6-164-172
5. Rogozin D. M. (2021). Distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Methodology of administrative survey of university teachers and students. Delo Publishing House, RANEPA. — in Russ.
6. Seliverstova N. S. (2024). Structural shifts in the Russian electronics industry. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, 17(1): 67–75. — In Russ. https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2024-1-1255
7. Sizova I., Orlova N., & Elagina E. (2023). Employee competence in conditions of socio-Economic uncertainty. Sociological Journal, 29(4): 31–55. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2023.29.4.2
8. Solovyov A. I. (2024). Agents and mechanisms of political domination, or how a “winning coalition” rules. Polis. Political Studies, 2: 96–117. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.02.08
9. Temnitskiy A. (2022). The role of self-affirmation values in achieving the wellbeing for russian workers. Sociological Journal, 28(1): 61–79. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2022.28.1.8838
10. Chekmarev O. P., Ilves A. L., & Konev P. A. (2023). Employment and staff short-age in Russia under sanctions pressure: labor supply factor analysis. Russian Journal of Labour Economics, 10(4): 475–496. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.18334/et.10.4.117602
11. Entin M. L., Entina E. G., Davranova S. B., & Nadzharov A. M. (2024). Theoretical and methodological aspects of the Western sanctions policy research. Polis. Political Studies, 1: 7–20. — in Russ. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.01.02
12. Chinorachy R., Corejova T. (2019) Impact of digital technologies on labor market and the transport sector. Transportation Research Procedia, 40: 994–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.139
13. Ermakoff I. (2015). The Structure of Contingency. American Journal of Sociology, 121(1): 64–125. https://doi.org/10.1086/682026
14. Evangelista R., Guerrieri P., Meliciani V. (2014). The economic impact of digital technologies in Europe. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23(8): 802–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.918438
15. Gaur A., Settles A., Vaatanen J. (2023). Do economic sanctions work? Evidence from the Russian-Ukraine conflict. Journal of Management studies, 60 (6): 1391–1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12933
16. Gerber T. P., & Gimpelson V. (2024). Inequality and social stratification in Russia during the Putin regime: From market transition to war on Ukraine. Sociology Compass, 18(3): e13196. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13196
17. Maslova V. V., Zaruk N. F., & Avdeev M. V. (2024). Accumulation and Consumption in the Agricultural Sector of the Russian Economy. In E. G. Popkova, A. V. Bogoviz, B. S. Sergi, O. V. Kaurova, & A. N. Maloletko (Eds.), Sustainable Development of the Agrarian Economy Based on Digital Technologies and Smart Innovations. Springer Nature Switzerland: 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51272-8_2
18. Bitzinger R. A., Raska M. (2022). Chinese and Russian military modernization and the fourth Industrial revolution. In S. Kirchberger, S. Sinjen, N. Wormer (Ed.) Russia-China relations: Emerging alliance or eternal rivals? Springer: 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97012-3
19. Tavokin E. P. (2024) About the personnel problem in modern Russia. Human Resources Management and Services, 6(3): 3485. https://doi.org/10.18282/hrms.v6i3.3485
Review
For citations:
Rogozin D.M., Chentsova A.A. Discrete Present, Continuous past, and Active Future of the Labor Market in Khakassia. Sociology of Power. 2025;37(2):157-186. (In Russ.)