Preview

Sociology of Power

Advanced search

Ordinal Society and Its Future. Book Review: Fourcade M., Healy K. (2024) Ordinal Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-4-218-230

About the Author

D. M. Zhikharevich
University of Vienna
Australia

Dmitrii M. Zhikharevich — researcher at the Department of Political Science,

Vienna



References

1. Wallserstein I. (2004) Bourgeois(ie): concept and reality from XI to XXI centuries. In: Balibar E., Wallerstein I. Race, nation, class. Ambiguous identities. Moscow: Logos: 160–181. — in Russ.

2. Graeber D. (2021) Dead zones of imagination. Paranthesa, 28 December 2021. URL: <https://www.paranteza.info/post/graeber-dead-zones> — in Russ.

3. Zuboff S. (2022) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing. — in Russ.

4. Marx K., Engels F. (1969) Collected works. 2nd edition. Volume 46. Part 2, Moscow: State publishing house of political literature. — in Russ.

5. Marx K., Engels F. (1974) Collected works. 2nd edition. Volume 42, Moscow: State publishing house of political literature. — in Russ.

6. Srnicek N. (2018) Platform Capitalism, M.: HSE Press. — in Russ.

7. Tregubova N. D. (2020) Division of Labor, Cooperation, and New Types of Expertise in the Age of Artificial Sociality: The Case of IT-companies in Russia and Belarus. Sociology of Power, 32(1): 120–154. — in Russ.

8. Burrell J. et al. (2021) The Society of Algorithms. Annual review of sociology, 47(1): 213– 237. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090820-020800

9. Carruthers B. G. (2013) From uncertainty toward risk: the case of credit ratings. Socioeconomic review, 11(3): 525–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mws027

10. David-Fox M. (2018) Bolshevik Millenarianism as Academic Blockbuster. Canadian-American Slavic Studies, 52: 75–86. https://doi.org/10.17613/M64S22

11. Esposito E., & Stark D. (2019) What’s Observed in a Rating? Rankings as Orientation in the Face of Uncertainty. Theory, Culture & Society, 026327641982627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419826276

12. Fourcade M. and Healy K. (2013) Classification situations: Life-chances in the neoliberal era. Accounting, organizations and society, 38(8): 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2013.11.002

13. Fourcade M. and Healy K. (2017) Seeing like a market. Socio-economic review, p. mww033. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww033

14. Graeber D. (2014) On the moral grounds of economic relations: A Maussian approach. Journal of Classical Sociology, 14(1): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X13494719

15. Guseva A. and Rona-Tas A. (2001) Uncertainty, Risk, and Trust: Russian and American Credit Card Markets Compared. American sociological review, 66(5): 623–646. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088951

16. Hacking I. (2007) Kinds of People: Moving Targets. Proceedings of the British Academy, 151: 285–318.

17. Lécuyer C. (2006) Making Silicon Valley: innovation and the growth of high tech, 1930–1970, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

18. Mennicken A. and Espeland W. N. (2019) What’s New with Numbers? Sociological Approaches to the Study of Quantification. Annual review of sociology, 45(1): 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343

19. Berman E. P. and Hirschman D. (2018) The Sociology of Quantification: Where Are We Now?. Contemporary Sociology, 47(3): 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306118767649

20. Espeland W. N. and Stevens M. L. (2008) A Sociology of Quantification. Archives européennes de sociologie. European journal of sociology, 49(3): 401–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975609000150

21. Espeland W. N. and Stevens M. L. (1998) Commensuration as a Social Process. Annual review of sociology, 24(1): 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313

22. Min B. H. and Borch C. (2022) Systemic failures and organizational risk management in algorithmic trading: Normal accidents and high reliability in financial markets. Social studies of science, 52(2): 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211048515

23. Moulier-Boutang Y. (2004) Cognitive Capitalism. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press.

24. Porter T. (1993) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

25. Prasad M. (2012) The Land of Too Much: American Abundance and the Paradox of Poverty, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26. Tilly C. (1998) Durable inequality, Berkeley: University of California Press.

27. Thomas S. L., Nafus D. and Sherman J. (2018) Algorithms as fetish: Faith and possibility in algorithmic work. Big data & society, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717751552

28. Whyte W. H. (1957) The organization man, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

29. Zhikharevich D. (2021) How Algorithms Became Capitalist. Book Review of: Zuboff Sh. Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019. The monitoring of public opinion economic&social changes, 1: 398-409. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.1.1907


Review

For citations:


Zhikharevich D.M. Ordinal Society and Its Future. Book Review: Fourcade M., Healy K. (2024) Ordinal Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Sociology of Power. 2024;36(4):218-230. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-4-218-230

Views: 192


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0492 (Print)
ISSN 2413-144X (Online)