Preview

Социология власти

Расширенный поиск

Снаружи всех измерений Рецензия на книгу: Fourcade M., Healy K. (2024) Ordinal Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-4-218-230

Об авторе

Д. М. Жихаревич
Венский университет
Австралия

Жихаревич Дмитрий Михайлович — научный сотрудник факультета политических наук

Вена



Список литературы

1. Валлерстайн И. (2004) Буржуа(зия): понятие и реальность с XI по XXI век. Балибар Э., Валлерстайн И. Раса, нация, класс. М.: Логос: 160–181.

2. Гребер Д. (2021) Мертвые зоны воображения. Парантеза, 28 декабря 2021. URL: <https://www.paranteza.info/post/graeber-dead-zones>

3. Зубофф Ш. (2022) Эпоха надзорного капитализма. Битва за человеческое будущее на новых рубежах, М.: Издательство Института Гайдара.

4. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. (1969) Сочинения, 2-е изд. Т. 46. Ч. 2, М.: Госполитиздат.

5. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. (1974) Сочинения, 2-е изд. Т. 42, М.: Госполитиздат.

6. Срничек Н. (2019) Капитализм платформ, М.: ВШЭ. EDN: VRPYEZ

7. Трегубова Н. Д. (2020) Разделение труда, кооперация и новые типы экспертизы в условиях искусственной социальности (по материалам исследования российских и белорусских ИТ-организаций). Социология власти, 32(1): 120–154. EDN: LPSCBO. http://www.socofpower.ranepa.ru/files/docs/1_2020/4.pdf

8. Burrell J. et al. (2021) The Society of Algorithms. Annual review of sociology, 47(1): 213– 237. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090820-020800

9. Carruthers B. G. (2013) From uncertainty toward risk: the case of credit ratings. Socioeconomic review, 11(3): 525–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mws027

10. David-Fox M. (2018) Bolshevik Millenarianism as Academic Blockbuster. Canadian-American Slavic Studies, 52: 75–86. https://doi.org/10.17613/M64S22

11. Esposito E., & Stark D. (2019) What’s Observed in a Rating? Rankings as Orientation in the Face of Uncertainty. Theory, Culture & Society, 026327641982627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419826276

12. Fourcade M. and Healy K. (2013) Classification situations: Life-chances in the neoliberal era. Accounting, organizations and society, 38(8): 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2013.11.002

13. Fourcade M. and Healy K. (2017) Seeing like a market. Socio-economic review, p. mww033. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww033

14. Graeber D. (2014) On the moral grounds of economic relations: A Maussian approach. Journal of Classical Sociology, 14(1): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X13494719

15. Guseva A. and Rona-Tas A. (2001) Uncertainty, Risk, and Trust: Russian and American Credit Card Markets Compared. American sociological review, 66(5): 623–646. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088951

16. Hacking I. (2007) Kinds of People: Moving Targets. Proceedings of the British Academy, 151: 285–318.

17. Lécuyer C. (2006) Making Silicon Valley: innovation and the growth of high tech, 1930–1970, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

18. Mennicken A. and Espeland W. N. (2019) What’s New with Numbers? Sociological Approaches to the Study of Quantification. Annual review of sociology, 45(1): 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343

19. Berman E. P. and Hirschman D. (2018) The Sociology of Quantification: Where Are We Now?. Contemporary Sociology, 47(3): 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306118767649

20. Espeland W. N. and Stevens M. L. (2008) A Sociology of Quantification. Archives européennes de sociologie. European journal of sociology, 49(3): 401–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975609000150

21. Espeland W. N. and Stevens M. L. (1998) Commensuration as a Social Process. Annual review of sociology, 24(1): 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313

22. Min B. H. and Borch C. (2022) Systemic failures and organizational risk management in algorithmic trading: Normal accidents and high reliability in financial markets. Social studies of science, 52(2): 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211048515

23. Moulier-Boutang Y. (2004) Cognitive Capitalism. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press.

24. Porter T. (1993) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

25. Prasad M. (2012) The Land of Too Much: American Abundance and the Paradox of Poverty, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26. Tilly C. (1998) Durable inequality, Berkeley: University of California Press.

27. Thomas S. L., Nafus D. and Sherman J. (2018) Algorithms as fetish: Faith and possibility in algorithmic work. Big data & society, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717751552

28. Whyte W. H. (1957) The organization man, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

29. Zhikharevich D. (2021) How Algorithms Became Capitalist. Book Review of: Zuboff Sh. Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019. The monitoring of public opinion economic&social changes, 1: 398-409. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.1.1907


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Жихаревич Д.М. Снаружи всех измерений Рецензия на книгу: Fourcade M., Healy K. (2024) Ordinal Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Социология власти. 2024;36(4):218-230. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-4-218-230

For citation:


Zhikharevich D.M. Ordinal Society and Its Future. Book Review: Fourcade M., Healy K. (2024) Ordinal Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Sociology of Power. 2024;36(4):218-230. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-4-218-230

Просмотров: 191


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0492 (Print)
ISSN 2413-144X (Online)