Division of Labor, Cooperation, and New Types of Ex- pertise in the Age of Artificial Sociality: The Case of IT-companies in Russia and Belarus
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-1-120-154
Abstract
What are the changes that the development of AI brings to the character of labor status in organizations? Are there new momenta for cooperation between staff in organizations? Does AI initiate transformations in the division of labor? The paper addresses these questions on the basis of field research organized and conducted in Russia and Belarus. Employees of 16 Russian and Belorussian IT companies were interviewed. The foci of the paper are the new structures of labor occupation and the new types of expertise that have appeared on the scene with AI entering into the everyday life of society. The author discusses three basic trends. First, the appearance of new categories of activities and new types of expertise in the frame of cooperation between employees. Second, the emergence of "invisible" varieties of labor. Third, the replacement of local knowledge with the knowledge that stems from 'big data'. The main result of the study is the following. The division of labor in organizations influenced by the development of artificial intelligence / machine learning is characterized by a complex and specific type of cooperation which has a structure comparable to a "Russian doll". In order to portray this structure the author applies the concept of interactional expertise proposed by Harry Collins. The paper also formulates several research problems and hypotheses connected with current transformations in the division of labor, as well as with new experiences of employees who interact with AI technologies.
About the Author
Natalia D. TregubovaRussian Federation
PhD in Sociology
References
1. Вязникова В.В. (2008) Особенности трудовых взаимоотношений между российскими IT-фрилансерами и заказчиками их услуг. Экономическая социология, 9 (1): 88-113. EDN: OYNYUT
2. Губа К. (2018) Большие данные в социологии: новые данные, новая социология? Социологическое обозрение, 17 (1): 213-236. EDN: XNYZFZ
3. Земнухова Л.В. (2013) IT-работники на рынке труда. Социология науки и технологий, 4 (2): 77-90. EDN: QOXGHN
4. Земнухова Л., Руденко Н., Сивков Д. (2019) Цифровые городские исследования: проблемы взаимодействия и паттерны координации. Социологическое обозрение, 18 (4): 107-129. EDN: USDMCS
5. Резаев А.В., Стариков В.С., Трегубова Н.Д. (2020) Социология в эпоху "искусственной социальности": поиск новых оснований. Социологические исследования, 2: 3-12. EDN: ZMUOZB
6. Резаев А.В., Трегубова Н.Д. (2019) "Искусственный интеллект", "онлайн-культура", "искусственная социальность": определение понятий. Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены, 6: 35-47. EDN: DEAUGI
7. Срничек Н. (2019) Капитализм платформ, М.: ИД ВШЭ. EDN: VRPYEZ
8. Arora A., Gambardella A. (1994) The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Research Policy,23: 523-532.
9. Biagioli M., Lepinay V.A. (eds) (2019) From Russia with code: programming migrations in post-Soviet times, Durham: Duke University Press.
10. Collins H. (2018) Artifictional intelligence: against humanity's surrender to computers, Medford, MA: Polity Press.
11. Collins H. (2004) Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3: 125-143.
12. Daston L. (2018) Calculation and the Division of Labor, 1750-1950. Bulletin of the German Historical Institute, 62: 9-30.
13. Fedorova M. (2019). From Lurker to Ninja: Creating an IT Community at Yandex. M.Biagioli, V.A. Lepinay (eds) From Russia with code: programming migrations in post-Soviet times, Durham: Duke University Press: 59-86.
14. Knorr Cetina K. (1997) Sociality with Objects: Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge. Theory, Culture and Society, 14: 1-30. EDN: JQDKPB
15. Knorr Cetina K., Bruegger U. (2000) The Market as an Object of Attachment: Exploring Postsocial Relations in Financial Markets. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 25 (2): 141-168.
16. MacKenzie D.A. (2001) Mechanizing proof: computing, risk, and trust, The MIT Press.
17. Ribeiro R. (2007) The role of interactional expertise in interpreting: the case of technology transfer in the steel industry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 38: 713-721.
18. Suchman L. (2007) Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd ed.,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Turkle Sh. (2005) The second self: computers and the human spirit, 20tht anniversary ed.,The MIT Press.
20. Woo D., Myers K.K. (2019) Organizational Membership Negotiation of Boundary Spanners: Becoming a Competent Jack of All Trades and Master of Interactional Expertise. Management Communication Quarterly, 34 (1): 85-120.
Review
For citations:
Tregubova N.D. Division of Labor, Cooperation, and New Types of Ex- pertise in the Age of Artificial Sociality: The Case of IT-companies in Russia and Belarus. Sociology of Power. 2020;32(1):120-154. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-1-120-154