Coercion, Cognitive Capital, Value: On the Question of Principles of Knowledge Management
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-1-55-88
Abstract
The article analyzes ways to organize the so-called immaterial labor in the framework of the theory of cognitive capitalism (TCC). The author proceeds from the theory of immanent contradictions of cognitive capitalism formulated by Yann Moulier Boutang, Carlo Vercellone, Andre Gorz and developed in the works of other representatives of TCC: this is the contradiction between the autonomy of labor and its valorization, and the contradiction between the non-commodity nature of knowledge and strategies for its commodification. The following analysis is based on the assumption that labor organization regimes and organizational models are designed, firstly, to prevent the development of these contradictions, and secondly, to adapt to external socio-economic conditions (uncertainty, the precarization of hiring, the volatility of prices for intangible assets, crises). Due to the weak theoretical development of the problem of labor organization within the framework of the TCC, the article offers a reconstruction of the views of these authors on the problem. The paper offers two versions of the answer to the question about the organization of immaterial labor within the TCC: the version suggested by Moulier Boutang originates from the hypothesis of network coordination developed in the works of Yochai Benkler and Walter Powell, while the second version derives from the assumption of a weak structural determinacy of the actions of autonomous agents that are integrated into the value chain through the process of subjectivation. The author criticizes the given assumptions of the TCC and puts forward a number of theoretical propositions that justify the hypothesis of the transition to a Neo-Taylorist model of management of immaterial labor.
About the Author
David G. KhumaryanRussian Federation
Postgraduate student, Faculty of Social Sciences
References
1. Абдрахманова и др. (2019) Что такое цифровая экономика? Тренды, компетенции, измерение. XX Апрельск. междунар. науч. конф. по проблемам развития экономики и общества, Москва, 9-12 апреля, М.: ИД ВШЭ. EDN: DOBQRF
2. Вирно П. (2013) Грамматика множества: к анализу форм современной, М.: Ад Маргинем.
3. Горц А. (2010) Нематериальное. Знание, стоимость и капитал, М.: ИД ВШЭ.
4. Грановеттер М. (2002) Экономическое действие и социальная структура: проблема укорененности. Экономическая социология, 3 (3): 44-58. EDN: OYUWVD
5. Делез Ж. (2004) Переговоры, СПб.: Наука.
6. Доклад о цифровой экономике (2019) Создание стоимости и получение выгод: последствия для развивающихся стран. Конференция ООН по торговле и развитию. URL: https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/der2019_overview_ru.pdf.
7. Жихаревич Д.М. (2018) Теоретические развилки 1968 года: "новый класс" vs "массовый рабочий". Неприкосновенный запас, 5: 9-28. EDN: YRNUBV
8. Корсани А. (2007) Капитализм, биотехнонаука и неолиберализм: информация к размышлению об отношениях между капиталом, знанием и жизнью в когнитивном капитализме. Логос, 4 (61): 123-143. EDN: VMLPOL
9. Коуз Р. (2007) Фирма, рынок и право, М.: Новое издательство.
10. Лаццарато М. (2007) Предприятие и неомонадология. Логос, 4 (61): 168-197. EDN: VMLPPF
11. Петтит Ф. (2016) Республиканизм. Теория свободы и государственного правления, М.: Институт Гайдара
12. Польрэ Б. (2007) Двусмысленности когнитивного капитализма. Логос, 4 (61): 70- 113. EDN: VMLPNR
13. Расков Д.Е. (2019) Камерализм книг: переводы Юсти в России XVIII века. Terra Economicus, 17 (4): 62-79. EDN: BWBTFU
14. Ригби Д., Сазерленд Дж., Ноубл Э. (2018) Agile без границ. Harvard Business Review. URL: https://hbr-russia.ru/management/upravlenie-personalom/776124.
15. Руллани Э. (2007) Когнитивный капитализм: DeJa vu? Логос, 4 (61): 64-69. EDN: VMLPNH
16. Филиппов А.Ф. (2015) Советская социология как полицейская наука. Науки о человеке: история дисциплин, М.: ИД ВШЭ.
17. Фуко М. (2008) О начале герменевтики себя. Логос, 2 (65): 65-94. EDN: TJLKCN
18. Фуко М. (2006) Интеллектуалы и власть: Избранные политические статьи, выступления и интервью, М.: Праксис.
19. Фуко М. (2002) Интеллектуалы и власть: Избранные политические статьи, выступления и интервью, М.: Праксис
20. Ajunwa I., Crawford K., Schultz J (2017) Limitless worker surveillance. California Law Review, 105: 101-142.
21. Aoki M. (1986) Horizontal vs Vertical Information Structure of the Firm. The American Economic Review, 76 (5): 971-983.
22. Barker J. R. (1993) Tightening the iron cage: concertive control in selfmanaging teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (4): 408-37. EDN: BOZBET
23. Barratt E. (2008) The later Foucault in organization and management studies. Human Relations, 61: 515-537. EDN: INTUXZ
24. Beverungen A., Bohm S., Land C. (2015) Free Labour, Social Media, Management: Challenging Marxist Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 36 (4): 473-489.
25. Benkler Y. (2002) Coase's penguin, or Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law Journal, 112 (3): 369-446. EDN: DXETAN
26. Bohm S., Land C., Beverungen A. (2012) The Value of Marx: Free Labour, Rent and Primitive Accumulation in Facebook (https://www.academia.edu/1571230/).
27. Bohm S., Land C. (2012) The New 'Hidden Abode': Reflections on Value and Labour in the New Economy. The Sociological Review, 60 (2): 217-240.
28. Bohm S. (2006) Repositioning organization theory, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. Brockling U. (2016) The Entrepreneurial Self: Fabricating a New Type of Subject, SAGE Publications Ltd: London.
30. Conti et al. (2007) The anamorphosis of living labour. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 7 (1): 78-87.
31. Corsani A. (2013) Rent and subjectivity in neoliberal cognitive capitalism. Knowledge Cultures, 1 (4): 67-83.
32. Cote M., Pybus J. (2007) Learning to immaterial labour 2.0: MySpace and immaterial labour. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 7 (1): 88-106.
33. Dahl R. (1957) The concept of power. Behavioural Science, 2: 201-15.
34. Elger T., Fairbrother P. (1992) Inflexible Flexibility: A Case Study of Modularisation.
35. N. Gilbert et al. (eds) Fordism and Flexibility, London: Macmillan: 89-106.
36. Fleming P., Spicer A. (2007) Contesting the corporation: Struggle, power and resistance in organizations. Contesting the Corporation: Struggle, Power and Resistance in Organizations,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Garrahan P., Stewart P. (1992) Management Control and a New Regime of Subordination: Post-Fordism and the Local Economy. N. Gilbert et al. (eds.) Fordism and Flexibility, London: Macmillan: 107-117.
38. Gilson R., Sabel C., Scott R. (2009) Contracting for Innovation: Vertical Disintegration and Interfirm Collaboration. Columbia Law Review, 109 (3): 431-502.
39. Gough J. (2012) Capital Accumulation in Space, Capital-Labour Relations, and Political Strategy. Territory, the State and Urban Politics: 89-112.
40. Gough J. (1996) Not Flexible Accumulation - Contradictions of Value in Contemporary Economic Geography: 1. Workplace and Interfirm Relations. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 28 (11): 2063-2079.
41. Gough J. (1992) Where's the Value in 'Post-Fordism'? N. Gilbert et al. (eds) Fordism and Flexibility, London: Macmillan: 31-48.
42. Hassard J., Wolfram Cox J. (2013) Can Sociological Paradigms Still Inform Organizational Analysis? A Paradigm Model for Post-Paradigm Times. Organization Studies,34 (11): 1701-1728.
43. Hodgson D., Briand L. (2013) Controlling the uncontrollable: Agile teams and illusions of autonomy in creative work. Work, Employment & Society, 27 (2): 308-325.
44. Inagami T., Whittaker D.H. (2005) The New Community Firm: Employment, Governance and Management Reform in Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Jones C., Munro R. (2005) Organization Theory, 1985-2005. The Sociological Review, 53 (1): 1-15.
46. Lazzarato M. (1996) Immaterial labour. Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 133-147.
47. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte A. (2011) Organizations as discursive constructions: A Foucauldian approach. Organization Studies, 32: 1247-1271.
48. Linstead S., Thanem T. (2007) Multiplicity, Virtuality and Organization: The Contribution of Gilles Deleuze. Organization Studies, 28 (10): 1483-1501. EDN: JOQPDR
49. Marazzi C. (2011) The Violence of Financial Capitalism, Cambridge, MA: Semiotext (E).
50. Mateescu A., Nguyen A. (2019a) Algorithmic Management in the Workplace (https:// datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/).
51. Mateescu A., Nguyen A. (2019b) Workplace Monitoring & Surveillance (https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/).
52. Miguez P., Sztulwark S. Knowledge Valorization in the Cognitive Capitalism. Knowledge Cultures, 1 (4): 1-20.
53. Moulier Boutang Y. (2011) Cognitive capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
54. Nonaka I. (1994) A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5 (1): 14-37.
55. Lundvall B. (2016) From the Economics of Knowledge to the Learning Economy. The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope, London: Anthem Press: 133-154. 87.
56. Pitts F.H. (2018) A crisis of measurability? Critiquing post-operaismo on labour, value and the basic income. Capital & Class, 42 (1): 3-21.
57. Podolny J., Page K. (1998) Network Forms of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology,24: 57-76. EDN: HEZDRD
58. Powell W., Snellman K. (2004) The Knowledge Economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 190-220.
59. Powell W., Koput K., L. Smith-Doerr. (1996) Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116-45. EDN: CEICHL
60. Powell W. (1990) Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization.Research in Organizational Behaviour, 12: 295-336.
61. Raffnsoe S., Mennicken A., Miller P. (2019) The Foucault Effect in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 40 (2): 155-182.
62. Sabel C., Zeitlin J. (1985) Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets and Technology in Nineteenth-Century Industrialization. Past and Present, (108):133-176. EDN: IVPMUN
63. Saxenian A. (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
64. Takeuchi H., Nonaka I. (1986) The New New Product Development Game. Harvard Business Review. (https://hbr.org/1986/01/the-new-new-product-development-game).
65. Tichy N., Tushman M., Fombrun C. (1979) Social Network Analysis for Organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 4 (4): 507-519.
66. Thompson P. (2010) The capitalist labour process: Concepts and connections. Capital & Class, 34 (1): 7-14.
67. Townley B. (1993) Performance appraisal and the emergence of management. Journal of Management Studies, 30 (2): 221-38. EDN: EPXETR
68. Vercellone C., Lucarelli S. (2013) The Thesis of Cognitive Capitalism. New Research Perspectives. An introduction. Knowledge Cultures, 1: 15-27.
69. Vercellone C. (2013) The Becoming Rent of Profit. Knowledge Cultures, 2 (1): 194-207. Vercellone C. (2010) The Crisis of the Law of Value and the Becoming-Rent of Profit. A. Fumagalli, S. Mezzadra (eds) Crisis in the Global Economy: Financial Markets, Social Struggles, and New Political Scenarios, New York: Semiotext (e).
70. Vercellone C. (2005) The hypothesis of cognitive capitalism, London: Birkbeck College and SOAS, UK.
71. Vercellone C. (2007) From Formal Subsumption to General Intellect: Elements for a Marxist Reading of the Thesis of Cognitive Capitalism. Historical Materialism, 15 (1): 13-36.
72. Williamson O. (1973) Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations. The American Economic Review, 63 (2): 316-325.
Review
For citations:
Khumaryan D.G. Coercion, Cognitive Capital, Value: On the Question of Principles of Knowledge Management. Sociology of Power. 2020;32(1):55-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-1-55-88