The Concept of the State in Weber’s and Landauer’s Works: an Analysis of the Weberian Definition from the Perspective of Anarchist Theory
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-4-123-145
EDN: BEDPQL
Abstract
The article focuses on the concept of the state in the works of the German sociologist M. Weber and his contemporary, the anarchist G. Landauer. Specifically, it is commonly thought that Weber has a unique interpretation of the state, its nature, and inalienable characteristics. This Weberian approach did not fit into any of the traditions that existed at that time in Germany (for example, represented by H. Kelsen, G. Jellinek, and O. von Gierke). However, the author of the article tries to demonstrate that three main Weberian aspects of the state - 1) the monopoly on legitimate physical violence, 2) the relationship of domination, which is accompanied by a minimum desire to obey, and 3) the chance for the regular reproducibility of these relationships-are consonant with Landauer's concept of the state. This discovered conceptual affinity allows one to look at Weber's sociology from new angles, without being impacted by the personal beliefs of the German scientist, who very critically treated anarchism as a socio-political movement. In the final section of the paper, the author discusses the modern project of "anarchist sociology", which also uses Weberian methodology. The paper argues that "anarchist sociology" might be a promising social science with its unique vision of several key sociological topics, such as domination, power, or social inequality.
About the Author
Georgiy S. Semiglazov
Higher School of Economics National Research University, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Higher School of Economics National Research
University, Moscow, Russia
References
1. Anter A. (2014) MaxWeber’s Theory ofthe Modern State. Origins, Structure and Significance.
2. Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Bartolf C., Miething D. (2019) Gustav Landauer and the Revolutionary Principle of
4. Non-violent, Non-cooperation. G. Kets, J. Muldoon (eds). The German Revolution and
5. Political Theory, Marx, Engels, and Marxisms: 215–235.
6. Beitzel T. (2014). The process of (nonviolent) revolution and Max Weber’s ethics of
7. responsibility. International Journal on World Peace, 31 (2): 11–34.
8. Chernilo D. (2007) A Social Theory of the Nation-State: the political forms of modernity
9. beyond methodological nationalism, Oxon: Routledge.
10. Fernandez L. (2009) Being there: thoughts on anarchism and participatory observation. R. Amster, A. DeLeon (eds). Contemporary Anarchist Studies. An introductory anthology of anarchyin the academy, London; New York: Routledge: 93–103.
11. Harris T. (2012) The German Garden City Movement: Architecture, Politics andUrban Transformation, 1902-1931, Columbia University.
12. Hübinger G. (2009). Max Weber’s ‘Sociology of the State’ and the Science of Politicsin
13. Germany. Max Weber Studies, 9 (1/2): 17–32.
14. Kvachev V. (2019) From Weberian Bureaucracy to Networking Bureaucracy, Russian
15. Sociological Review, 18 (2): 28–41.
16. Landauer G. (2010а) Anarchic thoughts on anarchism. G. Kuhn (ed.). Gustav Landauer.
17. Revolution and Other Writings: A Political Reader, Oakland: PM Press: 84–94.
18. Landauer G. (2010b) Revolution. G. Kuhn (ed.) Gustav Landauer. Revolution and Other
19. Writings: A Political Reader, Oakland: PM Press: 110–188.
20. Landauer G. (2010c) Weak Statesmen, Weaker People! G. Kuhn (ed.) Gustav Landauer.
21. Revolution and Other Writings: A Political Reader, Oakland: PM Press: 213–215.
22. Levy C. (1999) Max Weber, Anarchism and Libertarian Culture: Personality and
23. Power Politics. S. Whimster (ed.) Max Weber and the Culture of Anarchy, Basingstoke:
24. Macmillan press: 83‒110.
25. Link-Salinger R. (1973‒1974) Gustav Landauer in Historical Transmission. American
26. Academy of Jewish Research, 41/42: 169–205.
27. Lucet A. (2019) Anarchist against Violence. Gustav Landauer’s Subversion of the Rational Paradigm. The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence, 3 (2): 105–122.
28. Mendes-Flohr P., Mali A. (eds) (2015) Gustav Landauer: Anarchist and Jew, Berlin,
29. München, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
30. Momsen W. (1990) Max Weber and German Politics, 1890–1920, Chicago: University of
31. Chicago press.
32. Oppenheimer F. (1922) The State. Its history and development viewed sociologically, New
33. York: Vanguard Press.
34. Palonen K. (2011) The State as a ‘Chance’ Concept: Max Weber’s de-substantialisation
35. and neutralization of the concept. Max Weber Studies, 11 (1): 99–117.
36. Pauli B. (2017) The Catholic Worker, Dorothy Day, and Exemplary Anarchism.
37. A. Christoyannopoulos, M. Adams (eds) Essays in Anarchism and Religion: Volume 1,
38. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press: 18–50.
39. Pisano L. (2018) Anarchic Scepticism: Language, Mysticism and Revolution in Gustav Landauer. Anarchy and Society. Reflections on Anarchist Sociology, Leiden, Boston:
40. Brill.
41. Whimster S. (ed.) (1999) Max Weber and the Culture of Anarchy, Basingstoke: Macmillan
42. Press.
43. Whimster S., Schröder J. (2013) Max Weber in Mynich (1919/20): Science and politics
44. in the last year of his life. Max Weber Studies, 13 (1): 15–37.
45. Williams D. (2014) A Society in Revolt or UnderAnalysis? Investigating the Dialogue
46. between 19th Century Anarchists and Sociologists. Critical Sociology, 40 (1): 469–492.
47. Williams D. (2012) From Top to Bottom, A Thoroughly Stratified World: An Anarchist
48. View of Inequality and Domination. Race, Gender & Class, 19 (3-4): 9–34.
Review
For citations:
Semiglazov G.S. The Concept of the State in Weber’s and Landauer’s Works: an Analysis of the Weberian Definition from the Perspective of Anarchist Theory. Sociology of Power. 2020;32(4):123-145. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-4-123-145. EDN: BEDPQL
Views:
3
Email this article 