The Story of a Thing: A Frame-Analytic Perspective on a Biographical Approach to Materiality
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-4-135-160
Abstract
The article focuses on the integration of a frame-analytic approach into the research field of the biography of material objects, whose main representatives were originally situated in classical anthropology and archaeology. The main aim of the article is the introduction of a sociological perspective to the study of the history of things. To achieve this goal, frame analysis is used as a tool of conceptual translation, based on a synthesis of key assumptions of existing approaches. The article is divided into two parts. The primary part undertakes a review of existing biographical concepts in disciplines related to sociology. Among their shortcomings is the anthropomorphizing of the biography of an object, which leads to linearity and the desire to establish the beginning and end of its ‘life’. We argue that a thing can have ‘a number of different simultaneous lives’ without specific dates. In addition, in the presented approaches, exchange appears to be the primary means of endowing an object with meaning, although it is not the only possible way. In contrast, we highlight the concept of ‘itineraries of an object’ as a preferable alternative. The first part of the work also formulates the epistemic horizon of a frame-analytical biography of the material. The unit of analyzing the history of a thing — its biographical event — is the transformation of the frame of the social situation given by the object under study. In the second part of the paper, the conceptual points are illustrated by the ‘life’ stories of several telephone booths: their transposition into a city Wi-Fi hotspot, their reframing into a work office, and their transposition into a complex facility at a scientific conference. It is argued that frame theory has a conceptual apparatus relevant for explaining changes in biography, which considers the relationality of meaning-making, the qualities of a thing per se, and the dispersed (as opposed to linear) nature of these changes.
About the Authors
U. S. Semovskikh
Moscow Higher School of Social and Economic Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ulyana S. Semovskikh — a student of the undergraduate programme «Contemporary Social Theory»
Moscow
D. R. Davletov
Moscow Higher School of Social and Economic Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Damir R. Davletov — a student of the undergraduate programme «Contemporary Social Theory»
Moscow
References
1. Benjamin W. (2012) The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility [The doctrine of similarity. Media aesthetic works. Collection of articles], M: RGGU: 190–234. — in Russ.
2. Vakhshtayn V. S. (2006) The Sociology of Things and Material Turn in Social Theory [The Sociology of Things. Collection of Articles]. М: «Territoriia budushchego» Press: 7–39. — in Russ.
3. Vakhshtayn V. S. (2013) On a Microsociology of Toys: Script, Affordance, Transposition. Logos, 92(2): 3–37. — in Russ.
4. Vakhshtayn V. S. (2022) Imagining the City. Introduction to the Theory of Conceptualization. M.: New Literature Review. — in Russ.
5. Volkodaeva I. B., Momot S. I. (2014) Small Architectural Forms as Symbols of Urban Environment. Design and Technology, 85(43): 5–14. — in Russ.
6. Goffman E. (2003) Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. M.: Institute of Sociology of the RAS. — in Russ.
7. Goffman E. (2006) The Anchoring of Activity [The Sociology of Things. Collection of Articles]. М: «Territoriia budushchego» Press: 54–117. — in Russ.
8. Durkheim E. (2018) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. M.: Elementary Forms. — in Russ.
9. Meshcherkina E. U. (2002) In memory of P. Bourdieu. A biographical illusion. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 1(1): 75–84. — in Russ.
10. Stepantsov P. M. (2017) Semantical and pragmatical dimensions of architectural object: Towards Wittgensteinian approach to the architectural studies. Sociology of Power, 29(1): 101−121. — in Russ.
11. Abildgaard M. S. (2019) When Doors Are Removed for Our Own Safety: The Material Semiotics of Telephone Booths. Design and Culture, 11(2): 213–236.
12. Alberti S. J. (2005) Objects and the museum. Isis, 96(4): 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1086/498593
13. Appadurai A. (1986) Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. A. Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge University Press: 3–63.
14. Bauer A. A. (2019) Itinerant Objects. Annual Review of Anthropology, 48: 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011111
15. Blackwell M. (2007) The secret life of things: Animals, Objects, and It-narratives in Eighteenth-century England. Bucknell University Press.
16. Bissell D. (2010) Passenger mobilities: affective atmospheres and the sociality of public transport. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(2): 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1068/d3909
17. Burström N. M. (2014) Things in the Eye of the Beholder: A humanistic perspective on archaeological object biographies. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 47(1): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2014.909877
18. Crabtree A. (2003) Remarks on the social organisation of space and place. Homo Oeconomicus, 19: 591–605.
19. Cress T. (2015) Social Situations and the Impact of Things: The Example of Catholic Liturgy. Nature and Culture, 10(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2015.100307
20. Gosden C., Marshall Y. (1999) The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology, 31(2): 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1999.9980439
21. Daston L. (Ed.). (2000) Biographies of Scientific Objects. University of Chicago Press. Domanska E. (2006) Тhe Return to Things. Archaeologia Polona, 44: 171–185.
22. Douglas A. (1993) Britannia’s Rule and the It-Narrator. Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 6(1): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecf.1993.0057
23. Flanner H. (1980) Phone Booth Song. Salmagundi, 50/51: 29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40547390
24. Gansky P. (2013) Privacy’s Waste Products: Touch, Contagion and Public Telephone Design. Journal of Design History, 27(2): 132–147.
25. Harding A. (2016) Introduction: Biographies of Things. Distant Worlds Journal, 1(1): 5–10. https://doi.org/10.11588/dwj.2016.1.30158
26. Holtorf C. J. (1998) The Life-Histories of Megaliths in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany). World Archaeology, 30(1): 23–38. DOI: http://www.jstor.org/stable/125007
27. Holtorf C. (2002) Notes on the Life History of a Pot Sherd. Journal of Material Culture, 7(1): 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183502007001305
28. Hoskins J. (1998) Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People’s Lives. Routledge.
29. Ingold T. (2007) Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues, 14(1): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1380203807002127
30. Joy J. (2009) Reinvigorating object biography: reproducing the drama of object lives. World Archaeology, 41(4): 540–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240903345530
31. Joyce R. A., Gillespie S. D. (2015) Things in Motion: Object Itineraries in Anthropological Practice. Sch. Adv. Res. Press.
32. Kopytoff I. (1986) The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. A. Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge University Press: 64–92.
33. McCormack D. P. (2008) Engineering affective atmospheres on the moving geographies of the 1897 Andrée expedition. Cultural Geographies, 15(4): 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474008094314
34. Mauss M. (2002) The gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Routledge.
35. Meskell L. (2021) Object worlds in Ancient Egypt: Material Biographies Past and Present. Routledge.
36. Swander M. (1992) Amish Phone Booth. The Kenyon Review, 14(4): 161–162. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4336778
37. Thomas N. (2009) Entangled objects: Exchange, Material Culture, and Colonialism in the Pacific. Harvard University Press.
38. York J. (2002) The life cycle of bronze age metalwork from the Thames. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 21(1): 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00150
Review
For citations:
Semovskikh U.S., Davletov D.R. The Story of a Thing: A Frame-Analytic Perspective on a Biographical Approach to Materiality. Sociology of Power. 2024;36(4):135-160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-4-135-160
Views:
551
Email this article 