Дом науки: жизнь и времена тропических и полярных полевых станций
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-3-272-297
EDN: XQPFZK
Аннотация
Полевой стационар, являясь переходным пунктом между унифицированным и очищенным пространством лаборатории и многообразными и уникальными пространствами «поля», представляет собой контролируемое, но четко не очерченное место, где можно получить доступ к природе и к ней «прикрепиться». Будучи жильем для приезжих ученых, полевые станции включены как в рутину и ритм повседневной жизни, так и в долгие циклы проживания, ветшания и восстановления. В этой статье рассматривается эмпирическое и концептуальное значения полевых станций в тропических и полярных широтах в качестве мест для научной работы и жизни ученых. Экстерриториальный, но в то же время домашний характер полевой станции влияет на достоверность знаний и их распространение вдоль фронтира науки. Задача создания дома в экстремальном поле, повседневный опыт экспатриации и апроприации определяют особую политическую динамику производства знания в этих местах. Обращаясь к полевым станциям, мы фокусируем внимание на образах природы и науки, которые питают транснациональные исследования и раскрывают эстетические и эмоциональные аспекты работы и жизни в этих далеких домах науки.
Ключевые слова
эстетика,
аффект,
домашняя жизнь,
полевые станции,
полевая работа,
полярный/тропический,
постколониальность
Об авторах
Пол Вeнцель Гейсслер
Кафедра социальной антропологии, Университет Осло, Осло, Норвегия
Норвегия
Норвегия
Энн Х. Келли
Департамент глобального здравоохранения и социальной медицины,
Королевский колледж Лондона, Лондон, Великобритания
Великобритания
Великобритания
Список литературы
1. Alcayna-Stevens L. (2016) Habituating field scientists. Social Studies of Science, 46 (6):
2. -853.
3. Anderson D.G., Berglund E. (2002) Ethnographies of Conservation: Environmentalism and
4. the Distribution of Privilege, Oxford: Berghahn Press.
5. Anderson D.G., Nuttall M. (2003) Cultivating Arctic Landscapes: Knowing and Managing
6. Animals in the Circumpolar North, Oxford: Berghahn Press.
7. Anderson W. (2009) From subjugated knowledge to conjugated subjects: Science and
8. globalisation, or postcolonial studies of science? Postcolonial Studies, 12 (4): 389-400.
9. Benson K. (2009) Field stations and surveys. P. J. Bowler, J.V. Pickstone (eds) The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 6, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 76–89.
10. Bodenhorn B. (2012) Meeting minds; encountering worlds: Sciences and other expertises on the North Slope of Alaska. M.Konrad (ed.) Collaborators Collaborating: Counterparts in Anthropological Knowledge and International Research Relations, New York:
11. Berghahn Press: 225-244.
12. Bravo M., Rees G. (2006) Cryo-politics: Environmental security and the future of
13. Arctic navigation. Brown Journal of World Affairs,13 (1): 205-215.
14. Bravo M., Sörlin S. (2002) Narrating the Arctic: A Cultural History ofNordic Scientific Practices, Canton, OH: Science History Publications.
15. Campbell M.B. (1999) Wonder and Science: Imagining Worlds in Early Modern Europe,
16. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17. Candea M. (2010) ‘Ifell in love with Carlosthe meerkat’: Engagement and detachment
18. in human animal relations. American Ethnologist, 37 (2): 241-258.
19. Cannon S. F. (1978) Science in Culture: The Early Victorian Period, Folkestone: Dawson
20. Publishing.
21. Carter P. (2010 [1987]) The Road to Botany Bay: An Exploration of Landscape and History,
22. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
23. Crane J. (2011) Scrambling for Africa? Universities and global health. The Lancet, 377
24. (9775): 1388-1390.
25. Crate S.A., Nuttall M.N. (2009) Anthropology and Climate Change: From Encounters to
26. Actions, Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
27. Cunningham A., JardineN. (eds) (1990) Romanticism and the Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Daston L., Lunbeck E. (eds) (2011) Histories of Scientific Observation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29. Didur J. (2013) Guns & Roses: Reading the picturesque archive in Anita Desai’s Fire
30. on the Mountain. Textual Practice, 27 (3): 499-522.
31. Droney D. (2014) Ironies of laboratory work during Ghana’s second age of optimism.
32. Cultural Anthropology, 29 (2): 363-384.
33. Fairhead J., Leach M. (1996) Misreading the African landscape: Society and Ecology in a
34. Forest-Savannah Mosaic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Fairhead J., Leach M., Small M. (2006) Where techno-science meets poverty: Medical research and the economy of blood in The Gambia, West Africa. Social Science &
36. Medicine, 63 (4): 1109-1120.
37. Galison P., Thompson E. (1999) The Architecture of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Geissler P.W. (2015) Whatfuture remains? Remembering an African place ofscience.
39. P.W. Geissler (ed.) Para-States and Medical Science: Making Global Health in Africa, Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 142–178.
40. Geissler P.W., Kelly A. (2016) Field station as stage: Re-enacting scientific work and
41. life in Amani, Tanzania. Social Studies of Science, 46 (6): 912-937.
42. Geissler P.W., Molyneux S. (2011) Evidence, Ethos and Experiment: The Anthropology and
43. History of Medical Research in Africa, Oxford: Berghahn Press.
44. Geissler P.W., Lachenal G., Manton J. et al. (2016) Traces ofthe Future: An Archaeology of
45. Medical Science in Twenty First Century Africa, Bristol: Intellect.
46. Graboyes M. (2015) The Experiment Must Continue: Medical Research and Ethics in East
47. Africa, 1940-2014, Athens: Ohio University Press.
48. Hastrup K. (2013a) Andaman Islanders and Polar Eskimos: Emergent ethnographic
49. subjects c. 1900. Journal of the British Academy, 1: 3-30.
50. Hastrup K. (2013b) Scales of attention in fieldwork: Global connections and local concerns in the Arctic. Ethnography, 14 (2): 145-164.
51. Heggie V. (2014) Why isn’t exploration a science? Isis, 105 (2): 318-334.
52. Heggie V. (2016) Higher and colder: The success and failure of boundaries in high
53. altitude and Antarctic research stations. Social Studies of Science, 46 (6): 809-832.
54. Henke C.R., Gieryn T. F. (2008) Sites of scientific practice: The enduring importance
55. of place. E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska M. Lynch et al. (eds) The Handbook of Science
56. and Technology Studies, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 353-376.
57. Herzig R.M. (2005) Suffering for Science: Reason and Sacrifice in Modern America, New
58. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
59. Kelly A.H. (2012) The experimental hut: Hosting vectors. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18: 145-160.
60. Kelly A.H. (2016) Seeing cellular debris, remembering a Soviet method. Visual Anthropology, 29 (2): 133-158.
61. Kelly A.H., Geissler P.W. (2011) The value of transnational medical research. Journal
62. of Cultural Economy, 4 (1): 3-10.
63. Kohler R.E. (2002) Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology,
64. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65. Kuklick H., Kohler R.E. (1996) Introduction: Science in the field. Osiris, 11:1-14.
66. Lachenal G. (2016) At home in the postcolony: Ecology, empire and domesticity atthe
67. Lamto field station, Ivory Coast. Social Studies of Science, 877-893.
68. Larsen E. J. (2011) An Empire of Ice: Scott, Shackleton, and the Heroic Age of Antarctic Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
69. Latour B., Woolgar S. (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd ed.,
70. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71. Livingstone D.N. (2010) Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge,
72. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
73. Lynch M. (1991) Laboratory space and the technological complex: An investigation of
74. topical contextures. Science in Context, 4 (1): 51-78.
75. Martin E. (2013) The potentiality of ethnography and the limits of affect theory. Current Anthropology, 54 (S7): 149-158.
76. MasseyD. (2004) Geographies ofresponsibility. Geograflska Annaler: Series B, Human
77. Geography, 86 (1): 5-18.
78. Mitchell W.T. (2002) Landscape and Power, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
79. Mitman G. (1996) When nature isthe zoo: Vision and power in the art and science of
80. natural history. Osiris, 11: 117-143.
81. Moyi Okwaro F., Geissler P.W. (2015) In/dependent collaborations: Perceptions and
82. experiences of African scientistsin transnational HIV research. Medical Anthropology
83. Quarterly, 29 (4): 492-511.
84. Myers N. (2008) Molecular embodiments and the body-work of modeling in protein
85. crystallography. Social Studies of Science, 38 (2): 163-199.
86. Nielsen K.H., Harbsmeier M., Ries C. (2012) Scientists and Scholarsin the Field: Studiesin
87. the History of Fieldwork and Expeditions, Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
88. O’Reilly J. (2016) Sensing the ice: Field science, models, and expert intimacy with
89. knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 22 (S1): 27-45.
90. Oreskes N. (1996) Objectivity or heroism? On the invisibility of women in science.
91. Osiris, 11: 87-113.
92. Palsson G., Hujbens EH (2009) The bog in our brain and bowels: The social attitudes
93. to the cartography of Icelandic wetlands. Environment and Planning D: Society and
94. Space, 21: 296-316.
95. Pearson M. (2004) ‘No joke in in petticoats’: British Polar expeditions and their theatrical presentations. TDR, 48 (1): 44-59.
96. Pollock A. (2014) Places of pharmaceutical knowledge-making: Global health, postcolonial science, and hope in South African drug discovery. Social Studies of Science,
97. (6): 848-873.
98. Raj K. (2007) Relocating Modern Science: Circulation and the Construction of Knowledge in
99. South Asia and Europe, 1650-1900, London: Palgrave MacMillan.
100. Redfield P. (2000) Space in the Tropics: From Convicts to Rockets in French Guiana, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
101. Redfield P. (2002) The half-life of empire in outer space. Social Studies of Science, 32
102. (5-6): 791-825.
103. Roberts P., Paglia E. (2016) Science as national belonging: The construction of Svalbard as a Norwegian space. Social Studies of Science, 46 (6): 894-911.
104. Schaffer S. (1994) From Physics to Anthropology — And Back Again, Cambridge: Prickly
105. Pear Press.
106. Schaffer S. (1997) Metrology, metrication, and Victorian values. B. Lightman (ed.)
107. Victorian Science in Context, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press: 438-474.
108. Schubel J.R. (2015) Some thoughts on keeping field stations and marine labs afloatin
109. turbulenttimes. BioScience, 65 (5): 458-459.
110. Schumaker L. (2001) Africanizing Anthropology: Fieldwork, Networks, and the Making
111. of Cultural Knowledge in Central Africa, Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press.
112. Seth S. (2009) Putting knowledge in its place: Science, colonialism, and the postcolonial. Postcolonial Studies, 12 (4): 373-388.
113. Shapin S. (1988) The house of experiment in seventeenth century England. Isis, 79
114. (3): 373-404.
115. Skrydstrup M. (2016) Of spheres and squares: Can Sloterdijk help us rethink the architecture of climate science? Social Studies of Science, 46 (6): 854-876.
116. Spufford F. (2010) I May Be Some Time, London: Faber & Faber.
117. Street A. (2016) The hospital and the hospital: Infrastructure, human tissue, labour
118. and the scientific production of relational value. Social Studies of Science, 46 (6): 938-
119.
120. Tilley H. (2011) Africa as a Living Laboratory: Empire, Development, and the Problem of
121. Scientific Knowledge, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
122. Tousignant N. (2013) Broken tempos: Of means and memory in a Senegalese university laboratory. Social Studies of Science, 43 (5): 729-753.
123. Weil S. (2002) Gravity and Grace, London: Routledge
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Гейсслер П.В., Келли Э.Х. Дом науки: жизнь и времена тропических и полярных полевых станций. Социология власти. 2021;33(3):282-297. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-3-272-297. EDN: XQPFZK
For citation:
Geissler P.W., Kelly A. A Home for Science: The Life and Times of Tropical and Polar Field Stations. Sociology of Power. 2021;33(3):282-297. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-3-272-297. EDN: XQPFZK
Просмотров:
1
Послать статью по эл. почте 