Preview

Sociology of Power

Advanced search

Field Research in early Soviet Criminology in the 1920s

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-3-254-281

EDN: HECXHG

Abstract

The paper examines field research methods in early Soviet criminology in the 1920s. The crime and criminality studies flourished in postrevolutionary Russia due to the relative intellectual freedom of the era of NEP and unprecedented access to penitentiaries for researchers. Although this interdisciplinary field of studies brought together scholars from different disciplines and professions (criminal law, psychiatry, psychology, anthropology), the sociological branch (represented by lawyers) was considered the most promising. While criminal sociology was traditionally associated with statistics, Soviet criminologists began experimenting with field research techniques, such as surveys, direct observation, qualitative interviews, and case studies. One of the methods-the study of so called "hotbeds of crime’-was most similar to contemporary understanding of field research: it involved the involvement of a researcher into crime-related communities (homeless, beggars, street children, former criminals) and research on the streets, night shelters, marketplaces or other criminogenic zones. Concerned about criminal subcultures, criminologists and prison administrators were interested in studying the inmate code, processes of prisonization, tattoos and other aspects of prison culture. In order to institutionalize the position of a scientist within the penitentiary system, two "experimental prisons" were organized in Moscow's places of detention: the Criminological Clinic and the Experimental Penitentiary of the State Institute for the Study of Crime and Criminal. The research is based on archival documents, research papers and periodicals.

About the Author

Mikhail A. Pogorelov
Museum of Preobrazhensky psychiatric hospital, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

historian, research fellow at the Museum of Preobrazhensky psychiatric hospital in Moscow; graduated from the history department
of the Higher School of Economicsin Moscow (2014)



References

1. DeVault M.L. (2007) Knowledge from the Field. C. Calhoun (ed.) Sociology in America:

2. A History, Chicago: Chicago University Press: 155–182.

3. Dobbs R.R., Waid C.A. (2005) Prison Culture. Bosworth M. (ed.) Encyclopedia of prisons

4. and Correctional Facilities. Vol. 1, Thousand Oaks: Sage: 719-722.

5. Drake D.H., Earle R., Sloan J. (2015) General Introduction: What Ethnography Tells

6. Us about Prisons and What Prisons Tell Us about Ethnography. D.H. Drake, R. Earle,

7. J. Sloan (ed.) Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography, London: Palgrave Macmillan:

8. -16.

9. Gibson M. (2002) Born to Crime: Cesare Lombroso and the Origins of Biological Criminology,

10. Westport: Praeger.

11. Gibson M. (2019) Italian Prisonsin the Age of Positivism, 1861–1914, London: Bloomsbury

12. Academic.

13. Kowalsky Sh. (2009) Deviant women: Female Crime and Criminologyin Revolutionary Russia, 1880-1930, DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.

14. Linder R. (1996) The Reportage of Urban Culture: Robert Park and the Chicago School, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15. Maxfield M.G., Babbie E. (2009) Basics of Research Methodsfor Criminal Justice and Criminology, Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

16. Miller M. J., Copes H., Hochstetler A. (2015) The History and Evolution of Qualitative

17. Criminology. H. Copes, M. J. Miller (eds). The Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Criminology, Abingdon: Routledge: 3-21.

18. Miller M. J., Miller H.V. (2015) Edge Ethnography and Naturalistic Inquiry in Criminology. H. Copes, M. J. Miller (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Criminology,

19. Abingdon: Routledge: 88–102.

20. Nye R.A. (1985) The Bio-Medical Origins of Urban Sociology. Journal of Contemporary

21. History, 4 (2): 659–675.

22. Robben A., Sluka J. (2012) Fieldwork in Cultural Anthropology: An Introduction.

23. A. Robben, J. Sluka (eds). Ethnographic Fieldwork. An Anthropological Reader, Malden:

24. Wiley-Blackwell: 1-28.

25. Rodriguez J. (2006) Civilizing Argentina: Science, Medicine, and the Modern State, Chapel

26. Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

27. Shelley L. (1977) Soviet Criminology: its Birth and Demise, 1917–1936. PhD dissertation,

28. University of Pennsylvania.

29. Sutherland E. (1960) Principles of criminology, Chicago: Lippincott.


Review

For citations:


Pogorelov M.A. Field Research in early Soviet Criminology in the 1920s. Sociology of Power. 2021;33(3):254-281. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-3-254-281. EDN: HECXHG

Views: 6


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0492 (Print)
ISSN 2413-144X (Online)