Field and Life: Reflections of a “Rooted” Anthropologist
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-3-131-148
EDN: GPAAMF
Abstract
This essay was penned in the spirit of the "postcolonial turn" and postcolonial frame for studying "other" people and cultures. It analyzes historical practices of "entry into the field," "being in the field," and subsequent publications of "descriptions of the field," in the West and in Russia before and after so-called "reflexive" and "postcolonial turns." It concludes that the scientific groundedness of the ethnographic field research, its novelty, and its scientific importance do not matter in the long run. Historically, there were cases where a well-written diary or travelogue made a more lasting impact on contemporary discourse and posterity than scientifically grounded field research. As examples of Levshin, Valikhanov, and Chekhov from the Russian and Eurasian history - and examples of the classics of anthropology, such as Malinowski and Evans-Prichard - show, the ethnographic quality, documental veracity, and longevity of ethnographic works is not connected with their scientific novelty and theoretical groundedness. The essay also thinks of the current rapprochement between academic life and life in the field, or as Geertz would call it, "Being Here" and "Being There." As a result of this rapprochement, ethnographies are moving closer to arts - non-fiction, investigative journalism, and even literary fiction - while at the same time moving away from the scientific-positivistic beginnings of ethnography in the social sciences.
About the Author
Alima Bissenova
Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan City,
Kazakhstan
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Associate Professor of Anthropology
References
1. Bissenova A., Medeuova K. (2016) On the problems of Regional Studies in/on
2. Central Asia. Forum: What is the Role of Regional Studies in Contemporary Anthropology? Exploring the Case of Central Asia. Аnthropological Forum, 28: 35-40. — in Russ.
3. Valihanov Ch. (2017) The country of six cities. Travel Journal to Issyk-Kul’, М.:
4. Рublishing house «E». — in Russ.
5. Valikhanov Ch. (1985) Collection of works in five volumes. Vol. 1, Аlmа-Аtа: The
6. Мain office of the Kazakh Soviet Encyclopedia. — in Russ.
7. Erofeeva I. (1996) Afterword. A.I. Levshin and hiswork «The description ofthe KirgizKazak, or KirgizKaisak, hordes and steppes, Almaty: Sanat: 533-595. — in Russ.
8. Kalandarov T. (2016) Forum: What isthe Role of Regional Studiesin Contemporary Anthropology? Exploring the Case of Central Аsia. Аnthropological Forum, 28:
9. -70. — in Russ.
10. Lаrina Е., Naumova О. (2016) Through Modernization: Traditions in the contemporarylife of Russia’s Kazakhs, M.; SPb.: Nestor–Istoria. — in Russ.
11. Levshin A. (1996) The description of the Kirgiz-Kazak, or Kirgiz-Kaisak, hordes and
12. steppes, Almaty: Sanat. — in Russ.
13. Nasritdinov E. (2016) Constructing Central Asia from within Central Asia. Forum: What is the Role of Regional Studies in Contemporary Anthropology? —
14. Exploring the Case of Central Asia. Аnthropological Forum, 28: 76-83. — in Russ.
15. Sartori P., Shablej P. (2019) Empire’s Experiments: Adat, Shariat, and the Production
16. of Knowledge in the Kazakh Steppe, M.: New Literary Observer. — in Russ.
17. Sokolov M.M. (2015) Sociology as miracle. The process ofsense-building in one
18. academic discipline. Sociology of Power, 27 (3): 13-57. — in Russ.
19. Kharkhordin O. (2015) Sociology as delivery, supply and confirmation of the
20. meaning of life. Sociology of Power, 27 (3): 58-68. — in Russ
21. Bissenova A. (2018) Urban Change in Astana: Practical, Ethnographical, and Theoretical Challenges. Book Discussion. Central Asian Affairs, 5: 80-84.
22. Clifford J. (1986) Introduction: Partial Truths. J. Clifford, G. Marcus (eds) Writing
23. Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of
24. California Press: 1-27.
25. Crapanzano V. (1986) Hermes’ Dilemma: The Masking of Subversion in Ethnographic
26. Description. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press: 27-51.
27. Evans-Prichard E. (1976) Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic Among the Azande, New York:
28. Oxford University Press.
29. Obeyesekere G. (1992) The Apotheosis Of Captain Cook: European Mythmaking In The Pacific, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30. Geertz C. (1988) Works and Lives: the Anthropologist as Author, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
31. Goffman A. (2014) On the Run: Fugitive Lifein an American City, Chicago: The University
32. of Chicago Press.
33. Hammersly M., Atkinson P. (2019) Ethnography: Principlesin Practice, New York: Routledge.
34. Lubet S. (2015) Ethics on the Run. Review of On the Run: Fugitive Lifein an American City
35. by Alice Goffman. The New Rambler. (https://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/
36. law/ethics-on-the-run)
37. Malinowski B. (2016) Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of Native Enterprise
38. and Adventurein the Archipelagos of Melanesian New Guinea, Oxford: Benediction Classics.
39. Narayan K. (2012) Alive in the Writing: Crafting Ethnography in the Company of Chekhov,
40. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
41. Narayan K. (1993) How Native is a Native Anthropologist? American Anthropologist, 95
42. (3): 671-686.
43. Popkin C. (1992) Chekhov as Ethnographer: Epistemological Crisis on Sakhalin Island. Slavic Review, 51 (1): 36-51.
44. Said E. (1979) Orientalism, New York: Vintage Books.
45. Singal J. (2015) The Internet Accused Alice Goffman of Faking Details in Her Study
46. of a Black Neighborhood. I Went to Philadelphia to Check. New York Magazine. Science of Us (https://www.thecut.com/2015/06/i-fact-checked-alice-goffman-with-hersubjects.html).
Review
For citations:
Bissenova A. Field and Life: Reflections of a “Rooted” Anthropologist. Sociology of Power. 2021;33(3):131-148. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-3-131-148. EDN: GPAAMF
Views:
6
Email this article 