How Is Ethnography of Work Possible in Russia? De- marginalization of Ethnography in the Field of Busi- ness Research
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-3-109-130
Abstract
This article analyses the prospects for the adoption of the labour ethnography methodology by Russian scholars. In many ways, the author is based on her own experience, which makes it possible to judge the possibilities of implementing ethnographic research of labor in both academic and applied projects. The topic of labor was central to Soviet sociology until the mid of 1980s; in the USSR, sociologists were mainly engaged in applied research commissioned by individual enterprises and organizations. However, the main research methods were questionnaires and interviews. The included observation was not used, except rare cases, such as Andrei Alekseev's project, although sociologists spent a lot of time at enterprises. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the study of labor by the method of included observation did not become more popular. In many ways it was hindered by the lack of opportunities to implement such research within the institutional framework of academic structures (researchers did not have time for long-term field work, there were no appropriate financial support programs, etc.). At the same time, the ethnography of labor was becoming a possible and in-demand approach in the field of applied research. Using the example of specific applied projects in which the author was a participant, the option of "adapting" the ethnography of labor to applied tasks was proposed by reducing the duration of field work (rapid ethnography) and by the introduction of a clear division of labor between the participants of the research team (collaborative ethnography).
About the Author
Olga V. Pinchuk
Dept. of History, National Research University Higher School of Economics,
St. Petersburg
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD student at the Department of History (HSE SPb)
References
1. Abramov R. N. (2019) Workers in Contemporary Sociological Research: the Russian Context. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Sociology. Political Science.International Relations, 3 (3): 283-292. - in Russ.
2. Alekseev A. N. (1997) Dramatic Sociology: The Experiment of the Worker Sociologist, Sankt-Peterburg: Institute of Sociology. - in Russ.
3. Alekseev A., Doktorov B. (2012) Looking for the Addressee, Sankt-Peterburg: Foster City. - in Russ.
4. Buravoj M. (1997) An Extensive Monographic Study: between Positivism and Postmodernism. Frontier, 10 (11): 154-176.
5. Buravoj M. (2013) Ethnographic Fallacies: Reflections on Labor in the Era of Market Fundamentalism. Labor, Employment, and Society, 3 (27): 526-536. - in Russ. EDN: XSZBCP
6. Genisaretskij O. I. (1998) Yamal Stream. Notes for the Humanitarian Symposium "Discovery and Connectivity of Cultures", M.: Institute for Humanitarian Partnership "The Way". - in Russ.
7. Geertz C. (2004) Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture, M.: ROSSPEN: 9-42. - in Russ.
8. Gorz A. (2007) Knowledge, Value and Capital. Criticizing the Knowledge Economy. Logos, (4): 5-63. - in Russ. EDN: VMLPMX
9. Gorshkov M. K., Toshchenko Z. H. T. (2018) Major Milestones in the Development of Russian Sociology (late 1950s - 2010s). Sociological research, (6): 3-16. - in Russ. EDN: XQOMLJ
10. Zelenin D. K. (1991) East Slavic Ethnography, Moscow: Science - in Russ.
11. Maksimova A. S. (2012) Analysis of Field Diaries in the Context of Ethnographic Text Production. Public opinion monitoring: economic and social changes, 1 (107): 128140. - in Russ.
12. Myojrsvan V. (2001) Soviet Ethnography: Hunters or Gatherers? Ab Imperio, (3): 9-42. - in Russ.
13. Pinchuk O. (2018) "Non-standard" Working Conditions for Women in the Shop: the Experience of Participant Observation.Interpretation.Interview.Interpretation, 15: 24-40. - in Russ.
14. Pinchuk O. (2021) Failures and Breakdowns: An Ethnographic Study of Factory Workers' Labor, M.: Social Research Support Fund "Hamovniki": Common Place. - in Russ.
15. Sokolov M. M. (2011) Labor Markets, Stratification and Careers in Soviet Sociology. Еconomic sociology, 12 (4): 37-72. - in Russ.
16. Toshchenko Zh.T. (2015) Sociology of life as a theoretical concept. Sociological research, (1): 106-116. - in Russ. EDN: TLPTHD
17. Allison A. (1994) Nightwork: Sexuality, Pleasure, and Corporate Masculinity in a Tokyo Hostess Club, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Astuti R. (2017) On keeping up the tension between fieldwork and ethnography. HAU.
19. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7 (1): 9-14.
20. Clifford J. (1988) The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography, Literature and Art, Cambridge: Mass.
21. Da Col G. (2017) Two or three things I know about Ethnographic Theory. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7 (1): 1-8.
22. Emerson R. M., Fretz R. I., Shaw L. L. (1995) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Chicago.
23. University of Chicago Press.
24. Geertz C. (1989) Works and lives: the anthropologist as author, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
25. Hammersley M., Atkinson P. (2019) Ethnography: Principles in practice, Routledge.
26. Howell S. (2017) Two or three things I love about ethnography. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7 (1): 15-20.
27. Humphreys M., Watson T. J. (2009) Ethnographic practices: from 'writing-up ethnographic research' to 'writing ethnography'. Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life, Sage: 40-55.
28. Ilngold T. (2014) That's enough about ethnography!. HAU: Journal of ethnographic theory, 4 (1): 383-395.
29. Ingold T. (2017) Anthropology contra ethnography. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7 (1): 21-26.
30. Jackall R. (1988) Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers, New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Juravich T. (1985) Chaos on the Shop Floor: A Worker's View of Quality, Productivity, and Management, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
32. Ladner S. (2012) Does corporate ethnography suck? A cultural analysis of academic critiques of private-sector ethnography (Part 1). Ethnography Matters.
33. Miller D. (2017) Anthropology is the discipline but the goal is ethnography. HAU.
34. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7 (1): 27-31. 129 Morgan J. (2017) The employee experience advantage: How to win the war for talent by giving employees the workspaces they want, the tools they need, and a culture they can celebrate.
35. John Wiley & Sons.
36. Paules G. (1991) Dishing it Out: Power and Resistance Among Waitresses in a New Jersey Restaurant, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
37. Pierce J. (1995) Gender Trials: Emotional Lives in Contemporary Law Firms, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
38. Sanjek R. (1990) A vocabulary for fieldnotes. R. Sanjek (ed.) Fieldnotes: The Making of Anthropology, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press: 92-121.
39. Shah A. (2017) Ethnography? Participant observation, a potentially revolutionary praxis. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7 (1): 45-59.
40. Smith V. (2001) Ethnographies of work and the work of ethnographers. Handbook of ethnography. Sage: 220-233.
41. Spradley J. P., Mann B. (1975) The Cocktail Waitress: Women's Work in a Men's Place, New York: Wiley.
42. Ssorin-Chaikov N. (2019) Reassembling history and anthropology in Russian anthropology: part I. Social Anthropology, 27 (2): 320-335. EDN: GVFMMU
43. Van Maanen J. (2015) The present of things past: Ethnography and career studies.
44. Human Relations, 68 (1): 35-53.
45. Vindrola-Padros C. (2021) Rapid ethnographies: A practical guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Wells M. J. (1996) Strawberry Fields: Politics, Class, and Work in California Agriculture
Review
For citations:
Pinchuk O.V. How Is Ethnography of Work Possible in Russia? De- marginalization of Ethnography in the Field of Busi- ness Research. Sociology of Power. 2021;33(3):109-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-3-109-130
Views:
7
Email this article 