Preview

Sociology of Power

Advanced search

Platforms as Markets, Architectures, and Ecosystems: A Review of the Dominant Approaches in the Platform Literature

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-1-169-192

Abstract

Online digital platforms are a new type of firm; they are data-driven,
software-based companies established in the late 90s due to increased
digitization and the extensive adoption of the Internet for economic and
social activities. Platforms are market intermediaries as they mediate
transactions between groups of users and benefit from network effects.
Platforms disrupt the conventional organization of firms and industries
and have become key players in capitalist economies. Platforms structure
social interactions, transform employment and the labor market, and
determine media consumption and cultural production practices. The
paper offers a comprehensive theory review covering three approaches:
the economic approach (industrial organization of network markets),
the technology engineering approach, and the strategic management
approach. The economic approach explains the nature of network effects
and highlights the differences between network markets and traditional
industries. The engineering technology approach demonstrates how
platforms can achieve network effects through technological architecture.
The strategic management approach explores platform growth strategies
and highlights how a platform firm deals with the external environment that includes user preferences, national regulations, and technology
convergence. The review focuses on the theoretical instruments most
relevant for the sociological and political-economic analysis of platforms.
The paper concludes with remarks on the uneven geographical distribution
of platforms. 

About the Author

Alina Yu. Kontareva
University of Oslo; National Research Tomsk State University
Russian Federation

PhD Candidate



References

1. Срничек Н. (2019) Капитализм платформ, М.: ИД ВШЭ. —Srnicek N. (2017) Platform Capitalism, Cambridge: Theory Redux. .—in Russ.

2. Adner R., Kapoor R. (2010) Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (3): 306-333.

3. Arthur W.B. (1989) Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events. The Economic Journal, 99 (394): 116-131.

4. Bajaj H., Jindal R. (2015) Thinking beyond WhatsApp. 2nd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom); New Dheli, India, 11-13 March 2015, New Dheli: IEEE: 1443-1447.

5. Baldwin C.Y., Clark K.B. (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (Vol. 1), Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

6. Baldwin C.Y., Woodard C.J. (2009) The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View.

7. A. Gawer (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing: 19-44.

8. Ballon P. (2009) The Platformisation of the European Mobile Industry. Communications & Strategies, 75, 3rd quarter. (https://ssrn.com/abstract=1559101)

9. Besen S.M., Farrell J. (1994) Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in

10. Standardization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (2): 117-131.

11. Boudreau K. (2008) Opening the Platform vs Opening the Complementary Good? The Effect on

12. Product Innovation in Handheld Computing. (https://ssrn.com/abstract=1251167)

13. Cabral L.M., Kretschmer T. (2007) Standards Battles and Public Policy. S. Greenstein,

14. V. Stango (eds) Standards and Public Policy, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University

15. Press: 329-344.

16. Caillaud B., Jullien B. (2003) Chicken & Egg: Competition among Intermediation

17. Service Providers. The RAND Journal of Economics, 34 (2): 309-328.

18. Cartwright M. (2020) Internationalizing State Power Through the Internet: Google,

19. Huawei and Geopolitical Struggle. Internet Policy Review, 9 (3): 1-18.

20. Cennamo C., Santalo J. (2013) Platform Competition: Strategic Trade-offs in Platform

21. Markets. Strategic Management Journal, 34 (11): 1331-1350.

22. Cusumano M.A., Gawer A. (2002) The Elements of Platform Leadership. MIT Sloan

23. Management Review, 43 (3): 51.Cutolo D., Kenney M. (2019) Dependent Entrepreneurs

24. in a Platform Economy: Playing in the Gardens of the Gods. Berkeley Roundtable on the

25. International Economy (Working Paper No. 3).

26. Dunleavy P., Margetts H.Z., Tinkler J., Bastow S. (2006) Digital-era Governance: IT

27. Corporations, the State, and e-Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

28. Eisenmann T., Parker G., Van Alstyne M.W. (2006) Strategies for Two-sided Markets.

29. Harvard Business Review, 84 (10): 92.

30. Eisenmann T., Parker G., Van Alstyne M. (2008) Opening Platforms: How, When and Why?

31. A. Gawer (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing: 131-162.

32. Eisenmann T., Parker G., Van Alstyne M. (2011) Platform Envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (12): 1270-1285.

33. Eaton B., Elaluf-Calderwood S., Sorensen C., Yoo Y. (2015) Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: the Case of Apple’s iOS Service System. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 39 (1): 217-243.

34. Eocman L, Jeho L, Jongseok L. (2006) Reconsideration of the Winner-take-all Hypothesis: Complex Networks and Local Bias. Management Science, 52 (12): 1838–1848.

35. Etro F. (2013) Advertising and Search Engines. A Model of Leadership in Search Advertising. Research in Economics, 67 (1): 25-38.

36. Evans P. C., Gawer A. (2016) The Rise of the Platform Enterprise: a Global Survey. The Center for Global Enterprise. (https://www.thecge.net/archived-papers/the-rise-of-theplatform-enterprise-a-global-survey/)

37. Farrell J., Saloner G. (1985) Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 16 (1): 70-83.

38. Fuentelsaz L., Garrido E., Maicas J.P. (2015) Incumbents, Technological Change and Institutions: How the Value of Complementary Resources Varies Across Markets. Strategic Management Journal, 36 (12): 1778-1801.

39. Funk J.L. (2009) The Co-evolution of Technology and Methods of Standard Setting: the Case of the Mobile Phone Industry. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19 (1): 73.

40. Gawer A. (2009) Platform Dynamics and Strategies: From Products to Services.

41. A. Gawer (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing: 45-76.

42. Gawer A. (2014) Bridging Differing Perspectives on Technological Platforms: Toward an Integrative Framework. Research Policy, 43 (7): 1239-1249.

43. Gawer A., Cusumano M.A. (2002) Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

44. Gawer A., Cusumano M. (2008) How Companies Become Platform Leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49: 28-35.

45. Gawer A., Phillips N. (2013) Institutional Work as Logics Shift: The Case of Intel’s Transformation to Platform Leader. Organization Studies, 34 (8): 1035-1071.

46. Greenstein S. (2015) How the Internet Became Commercial: Innovation, Privatization, and the Birth of a New Network, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

47. Hagiu A., Wright J. (2011) Multi-Sided Platforms. Harvard Business School (Working Paper No. 12-024).

48. Hannah D.P., Eisenhardt K.M. (2018) How Firms Navigate Cooperation and Competition in Nascent Ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39 (12): 3163-3192.

49. Hermes S., Clemons E., Schreieck M., Pfab S., Mitre M., Böhm M., Wiesche M., Krcmar H. (2020) Breeding Grounds of Digital Platforms: Exploring the Sources of American Platform Domination, China’s Platform Self-Sufficiency, and Europe’s Platform Gap. Twenty-Eighth European Conference on Information System (ECIS2020); A Virtual AIS Conference Proceedings. (https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020_rp/132?utm_source=aisel.aisnet.org%2Fecis2020_rp%2F132&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages)

50. Jacobides M.G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. (2018) Towards a Theory of Ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39 (8): 2255-2276.

51. Jacobides M. G., Knudsen T., Augier M. (2006) Benefiting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures. Research Policy, 35 (8): 1200-1221.

52. Ji S.W., Choi Y.J., Ryu M.H. (2016) The Economic Effects of Domestic Search Engines on the Development of the Online Advertising Market. Telecommunications Policy, 40 (10-11): 982-995.

53. Jia K., Kenney M. (2016) Mobile Internet Business Models in China: Vertical Hierarchies, Horizontal Conglomerates, or Business Groups. Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy (Working Paper No. 6).

54. Jia K., Kenney M., Zysman J. (2018) Global Competitors? Mapping the Internationalization Strategies of Chinese Digital Platform Firms. R.V. Tulder, A.

55. Verbeke, L. Piscitello (eds) International Business in the Information and Digital Age. Progress in International Business Research. Vol. 13, Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited: 187-217.

56. Katz M. L., Shapiro C. (1986) Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94 (4): 822-841.

57. Kenney M., Pon B. (2011) Structuring the Smartphone Industry: Is the Mobile Internet OS Platform the Key? Journal of Industry, Competition, and Trade, 11 (3): 239-261.

58. Kenney M., Zysman J. (2016) The Rise of the Platform Economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32 (3): 61.

59. Kenney M., Zysman J. (2019) The Platform Economy and Geography: Restructuring the Space of Capitalist Accumulation.(https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3497978)

60. Kenney M., Bearson D., Zysman J. (2021) The Platform Economy Matures: Measuring Pervasiveness and Exploring Power. Socio-Economic Review, mwab014, https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab014

61. Kenney M., Rouvinen P., Seppälä T., Zysman J. (2019) Platforms and Industrial Change. Industry and Innovation, 26 (8): 871-879.

62. Kotha S. (1998) Competing on the Internet: How Amazon. com is Rewriting the Rules of Competition. Advances in Strategic Management, 15: 237-268.

63. Kotha S., Rajgopal S., Rindova V. (2001) Reputation Building and Performance: An Empirical Analysis of the Top-50 Pure Internet Firms. European Management Journal, 19 (6): 571-586.

64. Kotha S., Rindova V.P., Rothaermel F.T. (2001) Assets and Actions: Firm-specific Factors in the Internationalization of US Internet Firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (4): 769-791.

65. Krishnan V., Gupta S. (2001) Appropriateness and Impact of Platform-based Product Development. Management Science, 47 (1): 52-68.

66. Li F. (2019) Why Have all Western Internet Firms (WIFs) Failed in China? A Phenomenon-based Study. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5 (1): 13-37.

67. Liebowitz S. (2002) Rethinking the Networked Economy: The True Forces Driving the Digital Marketplace. AMACOM, American Management Association.(https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stan_Liebowitz/publication/265226712_Rethinking_the_Networked_Economy_The_True_Forces_Driving_the_Digital_Marketplace/links/56f02e8d08ae584badc92d54/Rethinking-the-Networked-Economy-The-True-ForcesDriving-the-Digital Marketplace.pdf)

68. McIntyre D.P., Srinivasan A. (2017) Networks, Platforms, and Strategy: Emerging Views and Next Steps. Strategic Management Journal, 38 (1): 141-160.

69. Meyer M.H., Lehnerd A.P. (1997) The Power of Product Platforms, New York: Simon & Schuster.

70. Moazed A., Johnson N.L. (2016) Modern Monopolies: What it Takes to Dominate the 21st Century Economy, New York: St. Martin’s Press.

71. Nalebuff B.J., Brandenburger A.M. (1997) Co-opetition: Competitive and Cooperative Business Strategies for the Digital Economy. Strategy & Leadership, 25 (6): 28-35.

72. Nambisan S., Sawhney M. (2011) Orchestration Processes in Network-centric Innovation: Evidence From the Field. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25 (3): 40-57.

73. Parker G.G., Van Alstyne M.W., Choudary S.P. (2016) Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

74. Pasquale F. (2016) Two Narratives of Platform Capitalism. Yale Law & Policy Review, 35 (1): 309-319.

75. Patrucco P.P. (2012) Innovative Platforms, Complexity and the Knowledge Intensive

76. Firm. M. Dietrich, J. Kraft (eds) Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing: 358-375.

77. Patrucco P.P. (2014) The Evolution of Knowledge Organization and the Emergence of a Platform for Innovation in the Car Industry. Industry and Innovation, 21 (3): 243-266.

78. Plantin J.C., Lagoze C., Edwards P.N., Sandvig C. (2018) Infrastructure Studies Meet Platform Studies in the Age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20 (1): 293-310.

79. Pon B., Seppälä T., Kenney M. (2014) Android and the Demise of Operating System-based Power: Firm Strategy and Platform Control in the Post-PC World. Telecommunications Policy, 38 (11): 979-991.

80. Pon B., Seppälä T., Kenney M. (2015) One Ring to Unite Them All: Convergence, the Smartphone, and the Cloud. Journal of Industry, Competition, and Trade, 15 (1): 21-33.

81. Porter M.E. (2001) The Value Chain and Competitive Advantage. D. Barnes (ed.) Understanding Business: Processes, London: Routledge: 50-66.

82. Reuver de M., Sørensen C., Basole R. C. (2017) The Digital Platform: a Research Agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33 (2): 124-135.

83. Rochet J.C., Tirole J. (2003) Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1 (4): 990-1029.

84. Rochet J.C., Tirole J. (2006) Two-Sided Markets: a Progress Report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37 (3): 645-667.

85. Rysman M. (2009) The Economics of Two-Sided markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23 (3): 125-43.

86. Shankar V., Bayus B. L. (2003) Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Home Video Game Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (4): 375-384.

87. Shapiro C., Varian H.R. (1999) The Art of Standards Wars. California Management Review, 41 (2): 8-32.

88. Stallkamp M., Schotter A.P. (2021) Platforms Without Borders? The International Strategies of Digital Platform Firms. Global Strategy Journal, 11 (1): 58-80.

89. Steinberg M. (2019) The Platform Economy: How Japan Transformed the Consumer Internet, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

90. Steinberg M., Li J. (2017) Introduction: Regional Platforms. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 4 (3): 173-183.

91. Täuscher K., Laudien S.M. (2018) Understanding Platform Business Models: A Mixed Methods Study of Marketplaces. European Management Journal, 36 (3): 319-329.

92. Tee R., Gawer A. (2009) Industry Architecture as a Determinant of Successful Platform Strategies: A case Study of the I-Mode Mobile Internet Service. European Management Review, 6 (4): 217-232.

93. Tiwana A. (2013) Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy, Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

94. Tiwana A., Konsynski B., Bush A.A. (2010) Research Commentary — Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21 (4): 675-687.

95. Van Dijck J. (2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media, New York: Oxford University Press.

96. Walton N. (2014) New Conglomerates and the Ecosystem Advantage. China-USA Business Review, 13 (7): 431-443.

97. Wang X., Ren Z.J. (2012) How to Compete in China’s E-Commerce Market. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54 (1): 17–19.

98. Yoo Y., Henfridsson O., Lyytinen K. (2010) Research Commentary — the New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: an Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research, 21 (4): 724-735.

99. Zeng J., Glaister K.W. (2016) Competitive Dynamics Between Multinational Enterprises and Local Internet Platform Companies in the Virtual Market in China. British Journal of Management, 27 (3): 479-496.

100. Zittrain J. (2008) The Future of the Internet—And How to Stop it, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press


Review

For citations:


Kontareva A.Yu. Platforms as Markets, Architectures, and Ecosystems: A Review of the Dominant Approaches in the Platform Literature. Sociology of Power. 2021;33(1):169-192. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-1-169-192

Views: 6


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0492 (Print)
ISSN 2413-144X (Online)