Preview

Sociology of Power

Advanced search

Mystery of the Form Itself: the Return of the Value Problem

https://doi.org/0000-0002-8344-6846

Abstract

The theory of value is one of the fundamental topics of political economy;
it lays the very foundation for its functioning. The theory of value radically affects both the research program and the political views of economists and social theorists. Today, the question of value is considered to
be settled, at least within the economic mainstream. Sometimes it is
considered simply irrelevant or outside the field of study of "real" science. But the very desire to leave this question unresolved (to abandon
the consideration of the theory of value in general) or to find a temporary
solution for it (to deal with the issues of price instead of the issue of value)
represents evidence that we are dealing with an epistemological obstacle,
the very complexity of which reflects some of the contradictions of capitalism. The issue of value is not only a matter of economics; it should be
viewed through an interdisciplinary perspective. But, first of all, it is a
socio-philosophical question in the broadest sense of the word. Returning
to the question of value will allow us to take a fresh look at the "mystery
of the form in itself", the commodity form, which was the central object
of consideration of the political economy of Marx. This article proposes to
re-raise the question of value as a socio-philosophical basis for a criticism
of modern capitalism.

About the Author

Vadim G. Kvachev
Российский экономический университет им. Г.В. Плеханова
Russian Federation


References

1. —Wieser F. (1992 [1914]) The theory of social economy (selected chap.). Austrian School in Political Economy: K. Menger, E. Boehm-Bawerk, F. Wieser. Trans. From German, foreword, commentary, comp. V.S. Avtonomova, M.: Economics. — in Russ.

2. —Virno P. (2013) A Grammar of the Multitude: For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life, Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. — in Russ.

3. —Dardot P., Laval C. (2011) Neoliberalism and capitalist subjectivation. Logos, 80 (1): 103-117. — in Russ.

4. — Žižek S. (1999) Sublime object of ideology, Moscow: Khudozhestvennyj zhurnal. — in Russ.

5. —Žižek S. (2004) Iraq: a story about a teapot. Moscow: Praxis Publishing Group.

6. —Marshall A. (1984) Principles of Political Economy, M.: Progress. — in Russ

7. — Mason P. (2016) Post-capitalism. Guide to our future, M.: Ad Marginem. —in Russ.

8. —Menger K. (2005) Selected works, M.: Territory of the future. — in Russ.

9. —Pashukanis E.B. (1929) General theory of law and Marxism, Moscow: Communist Academy. (http://kritikaprava.org/library/31/obschaya_teoriya_prava_i_marksizm) — in Russ.

10. — Rubin I. (1929) Essays on the theory of value by Marx, Moscow: State Publishing House. (https://zarya.xyz/ocherki-po-teorii-stoimosti-marksa/ 21) — in Russ.

11. —Samuelson P. (1993) Economics, M. — in Russ.

12. — Sergeev A.A. (1977) Value. Great Soviet Encyclopedia. T.24. Part 3. M.: Soviet encyclopedia: 2493. — in Russ.

13. —Foucault M. (2010) The Birth of Biopolitics. A course of lectures given at the College de France in the 1978-1979 academic year, M.: Science. — in Russ.

14. — Horkheimer M., Adorno T. (1997) Dialectics of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, M.; SPb .: Medium, Juventa. — in Russ.

15. Blaug M. (1992) The methodology of economics, or, How economists explain, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

16. Bonefeld W. (2010) Abstract labour: Against its nature and on its time. Capital & Class, 34 (2).

17. Elson D. (1979) The value theory of labour. The Representation of Labour in Capitalism, London: CSE Books.

18. Jevons W.S. (1911) The Theory of Political Economy. (https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/jevons/TheoryPoliticalEconomy.pdf )

19. Kerr D. (1994) Trial by space. Common Sense, 15: 18-35.

20. Kvachev V. (2020) Unflat Ontology: Essay on the Poverty of Democratic Materialism. Stasis, 9 (1).

21. Lefebvre H. (2009) Dialectical Materialism. Minnesota: The University of Minnesota Press.

22. Marx K. (1890) Das Kapital. Vol. I. (https://content.csbs.utah.edu/~ehrbar/cap1.pdf ).

23. Minsky H.P. (2008 [1986]) Stabilizing the Unstable Economу. New Haven: Yale University Press.

24. Mises L. von (1957) Psychology and Thymology. London: Theory and History: 272.

25. Nitzan J., Bichker Sh. (2009) Capital as Power, N.Y.: Routledge.

26. O’Kane C. (2020) The Critique of Real Abstraction: from the Critical Theory of Society to the Critique of Political Economy and Back Again. Marx and Contemporary Critical Theory. New York: Springer.

27. Postone M. (2003) Time, labor, and social domination: A reinterpretation of Marx’s critical theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

28. Pranama ECO (2020) Веб-сайт. (https://pranamateco.ru/)

29. Reichelt H. (2005) Social Reality as Appearance: Some Notes on Marx’s Conception of Reality. Human Dignity, Routledge.

30. Robinson J. (1974) Economic Philosoph, Suffolk: Pelican Books.

31. Sohn-Rethel A. (1978) Intellectual And Manual Labour: A Critique Of Epistemology. Atlantic

32. Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press.

33. Toscano A. (2008) The Open Secret of Real Abstraction. Rethinking Marxism. A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society, 20 (2): 273-287.

34. Harvey D. (2018) Marx’s Refusal of the Labour Theory of Value. (http://davidharvey.org/2018/03/marxs-refusal-of-the-labour-theory-of-value-by-david-harvey/)

35. Zizek S (2012) Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso


Review

For citations:


Kvachev V.G. Mystery of the Form Itself: the Return of the Value Problem. Sociology of Power. 2021;33(1):103-124. https://doi.org/0000-0002-8344-6846

Views: 9


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0492 (Print)
ISSN 2413-144X (Online)