The Power of Discourse in Postmetaphysics: Between Dialectical Materialism and Transcendentalism

The article examines the significance of “postmetaphysics” as a continuation of Derrida’s philosophy of deconstruction for resolving the philosophical conflict between the transcendental and dialectical traditions of thought. The “postmetaphysical” trend seeks to rethink the relationship between language and power, trying to find a way to talk about power in a way that does not theoretically reproduce the power of metaphysical discourse. It also seeks to avoid the mistake of systems that criticize metaphysical discourse, which is that the criticism itself often takes on a sophisticated form of metaphysics, the source of which is hidden as much as possible. The central phenomenon that is deconstructed in Christian postmetaphysical philosophy in the text is “political ontotheology”, that is, the powerful metaphysical discourse used to build a political ideology. At the beginning of the article, the author examines two ways of formulating onto-theology in philosophy — transcendental and dialectical. It is argued that both directions in the modern era are confronted with their own impasse: transcendentalism cannot conceive of theory as a practical realization of thought, dialectics cannot get rid of the formulation of transcendental supra-historical truth in its practice. The text synthesizes the concepts of Caputo, Vattimo, and Desmond in order to propose a political-religious project that continues Derrida’s philosophy. It is concluded that post-metaphysics as a “weak thought” can change and weaken political structures without completely dialectically moving into political onto-theology, but it cannot be a field completely independent of metaphysics or replace it.

1. Agamben G. (2011) Homo Sacer. State of Exception, Moscow: Europe. — in Russ. EDN: SUGMWV

2. Bourdieu P. (2007) Social space and symbolic power. Bourdieu P. Sociology of social space, Moscow: Institute of Experimental Sociology; St. Petersburg: Aleteya: 64-86. EDN: QOECDF — in Russ.

3. Vattimo G. (2007) After Christianity, Moscow: Tri kvadrata, 2007. EDN: QUJHGL — in Russ.

4. Derrida J. (2001) Leave this name (Postscript). Gurko E., Derrida J. Deconstruction: texts and interpretations, Minsk: Ekonompress: 205-251. — in Russ.

5. Derrida J. (2020) A Certain Impossible Possibility of Saying the Event. Syg.ma (date of publication: 10.29.2020). URL: https://syg.ma/@noodletranslate/zhak-dierrida-niekotoraia-nievozmozhnaia-vozmozhnost-vyskazat-sobytiie. — in Russ.

6. Zizek S., Milbank J. (2020) The Monstrosity of Christ, Moscow: RIPOL classic. — in Russ.

7. Konacheva S. (2015) Poetics of Possibility: Ways of Thinking about God in Diacritical Hermeneutics. Bulletin of Russian State University for the Humanities. Series “Philosophy. Sociology. Art Criticism”, 2: 9-22. EDN: VURVYB — in Russ.

8. Lacan J. (2008) The Other Side of Psychoanalysis (Seminar, Book 17 (1969–70)), Moscow: Gnosis, Logos. — in Russ.

9. Manoussakis J. P. (2014) God after Metaphysics. Theological Aesthetics, Kyiv: DUH I LITERA. — in Russ.

10. Nancy J.-L. On Вeing-with. The Philosophy of Martin Heidegger and Modernity, Moscow: Nauka: 91-102. EDN: SZFABF — in Russ.

11. Rancière J. (2013) Disagreement, St. Petersburg: Machina. — in Russ.

12. Rorty R., Zabala S., Vattimo G. (2008) What is the Future of Religion after Metaphysics? Logos, 4 (67): 93-110. EDN: TJIUMV — in Russ.

13. Watkin W. (2022) Agamben, Benjamin, and the Indifference of Violence. Spectate (date of publication: 10.13.2022). URL: https://spectate.ru/watkin-violence/ — in Russ.

14. Voegelin E. (2021). The New Science of Politics. Introduction, St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal. EDN: BNSBGP

15. Foucault M. (2010) The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the College de France, 1978– 1979, St. Petersburg: Nauka. — in Russ.

16. Heidegger M. (1993) The Time of the Picture of the World. Time and Being: Articles and Speeches, Moscow: Republic: 41-62. EDN: PEUSOI — in Russ.

17. Hart D. (2010) The Beauty of the Infinite: The Aesthetics of Christian Truth, Moscow: Biblical Theological Institute. — in Russ.

18. Yannaras Ch. (2014) Variations on the Song of Songs, Moscow: Direct-Media. — in Russ.

19. Giannaras Ch. (2014) On the Absence and Unknowability of God Heidegger and the Areopagite, Moscow: Direct-Media. — in Russ.

20. Bielik-Robson A. (2019) Another Finitude, London; New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

21. Boer R. (2009) Criticism of Religion, Leiden: BRILL.

22. Boer R. (2010) Criticism of Theology, Leiden: BRILL.

23. Caputo J. (2006) The weakness of God: a theology of the event, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

24. Caputo J. (2023) What to Believe? New York: Columbia University Press.

25. Coward H., Foshay T., Derrida, J. (1992) Derrida and negative theology, Albany: State University of New York Press.

26. Derrida J. (1995) On the name, California: Stanford University Press.

27. Derrida J. (2020). The Politics of Friendship, London; New York: Verso Books.

28. Desmond W. (2008) God and the Between, Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

29. Esposito R. (2015) Two. The Machine of Political Theology and the Place of Thought, New York: Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823267644

30. Giannaras Ch. (2013) Against Religion, Brookline, Massachusetts: Holy Cross Orthodox Press.

31. Gillespie M. A. (2008) The Theological Origins of Modernity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226293516

32. Gonzales P. (2019). Between Philosophy and Theology: Towards the Theological Implications of William Desmond’s Thought An Interview with John Milbank. Radical Orthodoxy: Theology, Philosophy, Politics, Vol. 5. Nо. 1: 47-59.

33. Hägglund M. (2008) Radical Atheism: Derrida and the Time of Life, Stanford: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804779753

34. Heidegger M. (1996) Der europäische Nihilismus. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 6.2, Frankfurt am Main: 31-230.

35. Kearney R. (2010) Anatheism: Returning to God after God, New York: Columbia University Press.

36. Laruelle F. (2015) Introduction to non-Marxism, Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing.

37. Marion J.-L. (2005) Phenomenon and Event. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, Vol. 26, Nо. 1: 147-159. https://doi.org/10.5840/gfpj20052615

38. Raschke C. A. (2000) The End of Theology, Aurora: The Davies Group, Publishers.

39. Schulenberg U. (2019) Marxism, pragmatism, and postmetaphysics: from finding to making, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11560-9

40. Simpson С. B. (2009) Religion, Metaphysics, and the Postmodern. William Desmond and John D. Caputo, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

41. Taylor M. C. (2009) After God, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

42. Vattimo G. (1984) Dialectics, Difference, and Weak Thought. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, Vol 10. Nо. 1: 151-164. https://doi.org/10.5840/gfpj198410112

43. Vattimo G., Zabala S. (2014) Hermeneutic communism: from Heidegger to Marx, New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/vatt15802

44. Watkin C. (2013) Difficult atheism: post-theological thinking in Alain Badiou, Jean-Luc Nancy and Quentin Meillassoux, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748646302

45. Woessner M. (2017) Hermeneutic Communism: Left Heideggerianism’s Last Hope? Mazzini S., Glyn-Williams O. Making Communism Hermeneutical: Reading Vattimo and Zabala, Cham: Springer International Publishing: 35-48.