Just-in-time Late Capitalism: Why Does Postmodernism Still Remain a Sociocultural Dominant of Our Time?
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-1-11-38
EDN: ARZQQY
Abstract
The article attempts to recover the position of the temporal concept of postmodernism that describes our epoch as capitalist. At the end of the 20th century, postmodernism (in Fredric Jameson's interpretation) was not only the leading way to comprehend the social and cultural tendencies of the 'eternal present', but also a condition of 'late capitalism' (as per Ernest Mandel), characterizing our era from the socio-economical standpoint. However, at the beginning of the new millennium, philosophers and social theorists started to assert the exhaustion of postmodernism's heuristic potential as a theory meant to describe our time. Along with that, doubt was cast on all the attempts to understand modernity through the lens of capitalism. However, there was a group of scientists who continued to treat capitalism as a core aspect of modernity. As a result, many other social theories of capitalism, the alternative to postmodernism, have emerged: globalization, hypermodernism, communicative capitalism, metamodernism, postcapitalism, supervisory capitalism, cool capitalism, the capitalocene, and many more. The following analysis challenges the assertion that postmodernism has lost its explicative capacities. There are two pieces of evidence for the applicability of postmodernism. The first is that Jameson himself turned back to elaborating this temporal category, and the second is that other social theoreticians couldn't overcome Jameson's theoretical basis. All these opposite temporal perspectives on capitalism, as we found it, enhance the relevance of postmodernism, rather than refute this concept. Among all the contemporary approaches to the temporalization of capitalism covered by the author, there are only two concepts that speak of this social formation entering the fourth phase. But capitalocene - being one of them - supposes that the fourth stage has not yet begun, while metamodernism has nothing to suggest regarding the reasons for the epochal shift. This allows us to declare that postmodernism/late capitalism is still a viable scheme for the temporal comprehension of the state of current capitalism and modernity per se, while the new temporal schemes of capitalism are only expanding and reinforcing the terminological apparatus of postmodernism/late capitalism.
References
1. — Alexander J. (2003) The Meanings of Social Life. A Cultural Sociology, Moscow:
2. Praxis. — in Russ.
3. — Anderson P. (2011) The Origins of Postmodernity, Moscow: Territory of Future. — in
4. Russ.
5. — Aron R. (1993) Main Currents in Sociological Thought, Moscow:
6. Progress — Politics. — in Russ.
7. — Arrighi G. (2006) The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our
8. Time, Moscow: Territory of Future. — in Russ.
9. — Bauman Z. (2008) Liquid Modenity, Saint Petersburg: Piter. — in Russ.
10. — Beck U. (2000) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Moscow: Progress-
11. Tradition. — in Russ.
12. — Bell D. (2004) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, M.: Academia. — in Russ.
13. — Baudrillard J. (2000) In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities, Or, the End of the Social,
14. Yekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House. — in Russ.
15. — Vermeulen T., Akker R. van den, Gibbons A. (2020) Metamodernism: Historicity,
16. Affect, and Depth after Postmodernism, Moscow: RIPOL Classic. — in Russ.
17. — Giddens A. (2011) The Consequences of Modernity, Moscow: Praxis. — in Russ.
18. — Graeber D. (2014) Debt: The First 5000 Years, Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. — in Russ.
19. — Jameson F. (2019) Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, Moscow:
20. The Gaidar Institute›s Publishing House. — in Russ.
21. — Dean J. (2019) Communism or Neofeudalism? Logos, 29 (6): 85-116. — in Russ.
22. — Zombart W. (2005) The Essential Works, Moscow: Territory of Future. —
23. in Russ.
24. — Klein N. (2007) The Shock Doctrine, Moscow: The Kind Book. — in Russ.
25. — Lenin V.I. (1969) Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism. Complete works
26. in 55 volumes, Moscow: The State Publishing House of Political Literature. —
27. in Russ.
28. — Loving G. (2019) Critical Theory of Internet, Moscow: Ad Marginem Press; Garage
29. Museum of Contemporary Art. — in Russ.
30. — Pavlov A.V. (2018) Social Theory: Postmodern Turn — and Modernist Turn Out.
31. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 5: 158-170. — in Russ.
32. — Pavlov A.V. (2018) Images of Modernity in The Twenty-First Century:
33. Metamodernism. Logos, 28 (6): 1-19. — in Russ.
34. — Pavlov A.V. (2019) Postpostmodernism: How Social and Cultural Theories Explain Our
35. Time, Moscow: Delo Publishing House. — in Russ.
36. — Srnicek N. (2019) Platform Capitalism, Moscow: The Higher School of Economics
37. Publishing House. — in Russ.
38. — Srnicek N., Williams A. (2019) Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World
39. Without Work, Moscow: Strelka Press. — in Russ.
40. — Therborn G. (2015) The World: A Beginner’s Guide, Moscow: The Higher School of
41. Economics Publishing House. — in Russ.
42. — Therborn G. (2021) From Marxism to Postmarxism? Moscow: The Higher School of
43. Economics Publishing House. — in Russ.
44. — Fisher M. (2010) Capitalism Realism, Moscow: Ultraculture 2.0. — in Russ.
45. — Hardt M., Negri A. (2004) Empire, Moscow: Praxis. — in Russ.
46. — Hobsbawm E. (1999) The Age of Capital, Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix Publishing House.
47. Adorno T. (1968) Late Capitalism or Industrial Society? Opening Address to the
48. th German Sociological Congress. (https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/
49. adorno/1968/late-capitalism.htm) Bell D. (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society,
50. New York: Basic Books.
51. Bell D. (1976) The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, New York: Basic Books.
52. Callinicos A. (1990) Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique, New York: St. Martin’s
53. Press.
54. Crary J. (2013) 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep, London; New York: Verso.
55. Dean J. (2004) The Networked Empire: Communicative Capitalism and the Hope for
56. Politics. Empire’s New Clothes: Reading Hardt and Negri, New York: Routledge.
57. Dean J. (2005) Communicative Capitalism: Circulation and the Foreclosure of Politics.
58. Cultural Politics, 1 (1).
59. Flisfeder M. (2017) Postmodern Theory and Blade Runner, London; New York: Bloomsbury
60. Academic.
61. Hancock D. (2019) The Countercultural Logic of Neoliberalism, London; New York:
62. Routledge.
63. Harvey D. (1989) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural
64. Change, Oxford: Blackwell.
65. Hutcheon L. (2002) The Politics of Postmodernism, New York; London: Routledge.
66. Hutcheon L. (2007) Gone Forever, But Here to Stay: The Legacy of the Postmodern.
67. Postmodernism: What Moment? Manchester: Manchester University Press.
68. Jameson F. (1998) The Cultural Turn Selected Writings on the Postmodern 1983-1998,
69. London; New York: Verso.
70. Jameson F., Miyoshi M. (1998) The Cultures of Globalization, Durham; London: Duke
71. University Press.
72. Jameson F. (2000) Globalization and Political Strategy. New Left Review, 4.
73. Jameson F. (2002) A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present, London:
74. Verso.
75. Jameson F. (2012) Aesthetics of Singularity. Time and Event in Postmodernity. Georg
76. Forster Lecture. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh79_zwNI_s) Johanessen J.
77. (2019) Automation, Capitalism and the End of the Middle Class, New York: Routledge.
78. Lash S., Urry J. (1987) The End of Organized Capitalism, Cambridge, Oxford: Polity Press
79. and Blackwell.
80. Lash S., Urry J. (1994) Economies of Signs and Space, Los Angeles; London; New Delhi;
81. Singapore: Sage Publications.
82. Lipovetsky G. (2005) Time in Conflict, and Chrono-reflexivity in Hypermodern Times,
83. Cambridge: Polity.
84. Lipovetsky G. (2018) On Artistic Capitalism. Crash Magazine, 5. (http://www.crash.fr/
85. on-artistic-capitalism-by-gilles-lipovetsky-crash-65)
86. Mandel E. (1976) Late Capitalism, London: Verso.
87. Moore J. (2016) The Rise of Cheap Nature. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History,
88. and the Crisis of Capitalism, Oakland: PM Press.
89. Morozov E. (2019) Capitalism’s New Clothes. The Baffler. (https://thebaffler.com/latest/
90. capitalisms-new-clothes-morozov)
91. McGuigan J. (2009) Cool Capitalism, London; New York: Pluto Press.
92. McHale B. (2015) The Cambridge Introduction to Postmodernism, Cambridge: Cambridge
93. University Press.
94. Nealon J. (2012) Post-postmodernism, or The Logic of Just-in-time Capitalism, Stanford:
95. Stanford University Press.
96. Sassower R. (2013) Digital Exposure: Postmodern Postcapitalism, Houndmills;
97. Basingstoke; Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
98. Touraine A. (2007) A New Paradigm for Understanding Today’s World, Cambridge:
99. Polity.
100. Wegner P. (2006) Periodizing Jameson, or, Notes toward a Cultural Logic of Globaliza-
101. tion. On Jameson: From Postmodernism to Globalization, New York: State University of
102. New York Press.
103. Zuboff S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, New York: PublicAffairs.
Review
For citations:
Mazorenko D. Just-in-time Late Capitalism: Why Does Postmodernism Still Remain a Sociocultural Dominant of Our Time? Sociology of Power. 2021;33(1):11-38. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-1-11-38. EDN: ARZQQY
Email this article 