Transformations of the Political Imaginary in Post-Soviet Central Asia: The Cases of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan

The paper examines the structure and dynamics of the political imaginary of the two countries of post-Soviet Central Asia - Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. As the authors show, Russia has a special place in this structure. For a long time, many ordinary citizens of these states did not perceive Russia as a foreign state on an equal footing with others. This perception was due to a number of factors, the most important of which was Soviet institutional and psychological inertia. At the institutional level, Soviet inertia was expressed primarily in the transparency of the borders between Russia and the Central Asian countries. On a psychological level, it manifested itself in nostalgia for the Soviet past. It was the overlapping of soviet nostalgia with the understanding of the importance of migration to Russia for the material well-being of households that gave rise to a high level of loyalty to Moscow. Recently, however, the Russian Federation has started to gradually become a foreign state among others in the eyes of ordinary residents of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. In the minds of people, Russia still has a specific status, but this specificity is increasingly seen in a global context; in this context, other actors along with Moscow matter (Beijing and Washington, as well as Istanbul and Tehran). The process of turning Russia into an ordinary “abroad” was going on before, but it accelerated sharply after February 24, 2022. The authors identify signs of distancing from Russia both at the level of the ruling elites and at the level of civil society. Among these signs are, in particular, the desire of governments to demonstrate a multi-vector foreign policy, a change in the public rhetoric of top officials, as well as manifestations of anti-Russian sentiment in the public sphere of Kyrgyzstan.

1. Abashin S. (2011) Nations and Postcolonialism in Central Asia Twenty Years Later: Rethinking the Categories of Analysis. Ab imperio, 3: 193-210. — in Russ.

2. Abashin S. N. (2007) Nationalisms in Central Asia: in search of identity, M.: SPb.: Aleteyya. — in Russ.

3. Arenas I., Dzenovska D. (2010) Making “the people”. The Political Imagination and the Materiality of the Barricades in Mexico and Latvia. Laboratorium: Journal of Social Research, 2: 399-402. — in Russ.

4. Bystrova Ya.V., Dudnik S. I. (2019) The Political Imaginary in the Age of Stalinist Modernization. Conflictology, 14(3): 84-94. — in Russ.

5. Gorshenina S. (2007) Is the marginality of Russian colonial Turkestan eternal, or will post-Soviet Central Asia enter the field of post-research? Ab imperio, 2: 209-258. — in Russ.

6. Gorshenina S. M. (2019) The invention of the concept of Central / Central Asia: between science and geopolitics / Per. from fr. M. R. Maysulsa. Washington: Central Asian Studies Program, George Washington University. — in Russ.

7. Malashenko A., Kolesnikov A. (2012) There is no post-Soviet space. Moscow Carnegie Center. URL: https://carnegiemoscow.org/2012/06/08/en-pub-48498 (accessed 03.02.2022). — in Russ.

8. Malinova O.Yu. (2010) Symbolic Politics and the Construction of Macropolitical Identity in Post-Soviet Russia. POLIS: Political Studies, 2: 90-105. — in Russ.

9. Malinova O.Yu. (2016) Official historical narrative as an element of identity politics in Russia: from the 1990s to the 2000s. POLIS: Political Studies, 6: 139-158. — in Russ.

10. Morrison A. (2017). Central Asia: The Great Silk Road and the Great Game are just myths far from reality. URL: https://russian.eurasianet.org/node/64596/ — in Russ.

11. Neumann I. (2004) Using the Other. Images of the East in the formation of European identities, Moscow: New publishing house. — in Russ.

12. Olimova O., Olimov M. (1999) Tajikistan on the Threshold of Change, M.: Center for Strategic and Political Studies, Sharq Research and Analytical Center. — in Russ.

13. Remnev A. (2011) Coloniality, post-coloniality and “historical politics” in modern Kazakhstan. Ab Imperio, 1: 169-205. — in Russ.

14. Semenenko I. S. (2011) Political identity in the context of identity politics. POLITEKS, 7(2): 5-24. — in Russ.

15. Timofeev I. N. (2010) Russian political identity through the prism of the interpretation of history. Bulletin of MGIMO-University, 3 (12): 51-59.

16. Abashin S. (2015) Soviet Central Asia on the Periphery. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 16(2): 359-374.

17. Allison R. (2004) Regionalism, regional structure and security management. International Affairs, 80(3): 463-483.

18. Atkin M. (2011) Tajikistan: from de facto colony to sovereign dependency. Sally N. Cummings, Raymond Hinnebusch (eds) Sovereignty After Empire: Comparing Middle East and Central Asia. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

19. Cole J., Kandiyoti D. (2002) Nationalism and the Colonial Legacy in the Middle East and Central Asia: Introduction. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 34: 189-203.

20. De Haas M. (2016) Security policy and developments in Central Asia: Security documents compared with security challenges. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 29 (2): 203-226.

21. Gleason A. (2010) Eurasia: What is it? Is it? Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1(1): 26-32.

22. Heathershaw J., Herzig E. (eds) (2012) The Transformation of Tajikistan: the Sources of Statehood, L.: Routledge.

23. Heathershaw J. (2011) Tajikistan amidst globalization: state failure or state transformation? Central Asian Survey, 30 (1): 147-168.

24. Ibabez-Tirado D. (2015) How can I be post Soviet if I was never Soviet? Central Asian Survey, 34 (2): 190-203.

25. Laruelle M. (2018) (ed.) Tajikistan on the Move: State-Building and Societal Transformations, Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Lexington Books, 2018.

26. Laruelle M. 2021. Central Peripheries: Nationhood in Central Asia, L.: UCLpress.

27. Laruelle M., Royce D. (2020) No Great Game: Central Asia’s Public Opinion on Russia, China and the US. Kennan Cable, 56. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/uploads/documents/KI_200805_cable%2056_final.pdf (дата обращения: 11.03.2023).

28. Liu M. Y. (2011) Central Asia in the Post-Cold War World. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40: 115-131.

29. Patnaik A. (2016) Central Asia: Geopolitics, Security, Stability, L.: Routledge.

30. Peimani H. (2009) Conflict and Security in Central Asia and Caucasus, Santa Barbara, Califf.: ABC-CLIO.

31. Sahadeo J. (2012) Soviet “Blacks” and Place Making in Leningrad and Moscow. Slavic Review, 71(2): 331-358.