socofpowerСоциология властиSociology of Power2074-04922413-144XThe Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration10.22394/2074-0492-2023-2-8-17socofpower-71Research ArticleПРЕДИСЛОВИЕ РЕДАКТОРА-СОСТАВИТЕЛЯCONTRIBUTING EDITOR’S FOREWORDСемиотика для всех социологических целейSemiotics for All Sociological Purposeshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-5272ЕрофееваМ. А.ErofeevaM. A.

Ерофеева Мария Александровна — кандидат социологических наук, научный сотрудник Центра социологических исследований ; доцент факультета социальных наук МВШСЭН

Москва

Erofeeva Maria Aleksandrovna — Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Researcher at the Center for Sociological Research ; Senior Lecturer of the Faculty of Social Sciences 

Moscow

erofeeva-ma@ranepa.ruРАНХиГС; МВШСЭНРоссияRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA); Moscow School of Social and Economic Sciences (MSSES)Russian Federation202330012025352817Copyright © Ерофеева М.А., 20252025Ерофеева М.А.Erofeeva M.A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://socofpower.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/71

.

.

Статья подготовлена в рамках научно-исследовательско работы Центра социологических исследовани РАНХиГС «Роль любительских сообществ в развитии технологий: от практик использования к построению техноутопии» (2023)ReferencesКоллектив авторов (2023). Форум: Лингвистическая антропология. Антропологический форум, 58: 12–189.Authors’ team (2023). Forum 58: Linguistic Anthropology. Antropologicheskij forum, (48): 12-189. — in Russ.Колядов Д.М. (2019) Рец. на кн.: Charles Goodwin. Co-operative action. NY: Cambridge University Press, 2018. 521 p. Антропологический форум, (42): 231-241.Kolyadov D. (2019) A Review of Charles Goodwin. Co-Operative Action. NY: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 521 p. Antropologicheskij forum, (42): 231-241. — in Russ.Латур Б. (2006) Нового времени не было, СПб.: Изд-во Европ. ун-та в С.-Петербурге.Latour B. (2006) We Have Never Been Modern, Saint Petersburg: EUSP Press. — in Russ.Латур Б. (2006) Об интеробъективности. В.С. Вахштан (ред.). Социология вещей, М.: Изд. дом «Территория будущего»: 169-198.Latour B. (2006) On interobjectivity. Sociology of Things, M.: «Territoriia budushchego» Press: 169-198. — in Russ.Сачмен Л. (2019) Реконфигурации отношений человек‒машина: планы и ситуативные действия. М.: Элементарные формы.Suchman L. (2019) Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, Moscow: Elementary Forms. — in Russ.Скотт Дж. (2005) Благими намерениями государства. Почему и как проваливались проекты улучшения условий человеческой жизни, М.: Университетская книга.Scott J. (2005) Seeing Like a State. How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed, Moscow: University Book. — in Russ.Шюц А. (2004) Избранное: Мир, светящийся смыслом, М.: РОССПЭН.Schutz A. (2004) Selected Papers: A world glowing with meaning, Moscow: ROSSPEN — in Russ.Akrich M. (1992) The De-Scription of Technical Objects. Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building. Society Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: The MIT Press: 205-224.Akrich M. (1992) The De-Scription of Technical Objects. Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building. Society Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: The MIT Press: 205-224.Akrich M., Latour B. (1992) A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies. Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building. Society Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: The MIT Press: 259-264.Akrich M., Latour B. (1992) A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies. Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building. Society Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: The MIT Press: 259-264.Bourdieu P. (2010). Distinction, London: Routledge.Bourdieu P. (2010). Distinction, London: Routledge.Garfinkel H., Lynch M. & Livingston E. (1981) The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11(2), 131-158.Garfinkel H., Lynch M. & Livingston E. (1981) The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11(2), 131-158.Goodwin C. (2018) Co-operative action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Goodwin C. (2018) Co-operative action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Høstaker R. (2005) Latour — Semiotics and Science Studies. Science Studies, 18(2): 5–25.Høstaker R. (2005) Latour — Semiotics and Science Studies. Science Studies, 18(2): 5–25.Latour B., Woolgar S. (1986). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Latour B., Woolgar S. (1986). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Latour B. (1992) Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building. Society Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: The MIT Press: 225-258.Latour B. (1992) Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building. Society Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: The MIT Press: 225-258.Latour B. (2013) An Inquiry Into Modes of Existence, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Latour B. (2013) An Inquiry Into Modes of Existence, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Latour B., Jensen P., Venturini T., Grauwin S., Boullier D. (2012). “The whole is always smaller than its parts”: a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads. The British journal of sociology, 63(4): 590-615.Latour B., Jensen P., Venturini T., Grauwin S., Boullier D. (2012). “The whole is always smaller than its parts”: a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads. The British journal of sociology, 63(4): 590-615.Law J. (2009) Actor-network theory and material semiotics. Bryan S. Turner (ed.) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, Oxford: Blackwell.Law J. (2009) Actor-network theory and material semiotics. Bryan S. Turner (ed.) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, Oxford: Blackwell.Law J., Hassard J. (1999) Actor-network theory and after. John Law and John Hassard (eds.) The Sociological Review, 47(S1).Law J., Hassard J. (1999) Actor-network theory and after. John Law and John Hassard (eds.) The Sociological Review, 47(S1).Millikan R.G. (2018) Biosemantics and Words that Don’t Represent. Theoria, 84 (3): 229-241.Millikan R.G. (2018) Biosemantics and Words that Don’t Represent. Theoria, 84 (3): 229-241.Peirce Ch.S. (1931) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 5. Cambridge [Mass.]: Harvard University Press.Peirce Ch.S. (1931) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 5. Cambridge [Mass.]: Harvard University Press.Seuren L.M., Wherton J., Greenhalgh T., Shaw S.E. (2021) Whose turn is it anyway? Latency and the organization of turn-taking in video-mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 172: 63-78.Seuren L.M., Wherton J., Greenhalgh T., Shaw S.E. (2021) Whose turn is it anyway? Latency and the organization of turn-taking in video-mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 172: 63-78.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.