socofpowerСоциология властиSociology of Power2074-04922413-144XThe Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration10.22394/2074-0492-2022-4-247-273socofpower-40Research ArticleСТАТЬИARTICLESВлияние структуры организационного поля ветеринарной медицины мелких домашних животных на процессы профессионализации ветеринарных врачейInfluence of the Structure of the Organizational Field of Small Animal Veterinary Medicine on the Processes of Professionalization of Veterinarianshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0223-9766ЩегловЯ. И.ScheglovYa. I.

Яков Иванович Щеглов — аспирант

Санкт-Петербург

Yakov I. Scheglov — phd-student

St. Petersburg

yakovscheglov@gmail.comСоциологический институт РАНРоссияSociological Institute, Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation202229012025343-4247273Copyright © Щеглов Я.И., 20252025Щеглов Я.И.Scheglov Y.I.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://socofpower.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/40

Данный текст задумывался как попытка описать организационное поле ветеринарной медицины мелких домашних животных в России и его влияние на процессы становления профессии ветеринарных врачей мелких домашних животных как отдельной профессиональной группы. Возникнув в начале 1990-х годов в России как отдельная ветвь ветеринарии, ветеринарная медицина мелких домашних животных прошла путь от интуитивных практик лечения собак и кошек до сложноорганизованного организационного поля с множеством акторов. Несмотря на такое стремительное развитие, данная область, в отличие от ветеринарной медицины сельского хозяйства, до сих пор остается без сильного институционального регулирования. Профессия ветеринарного врача мелких домашних животных не живет в конвенциональной для нашего региона континентальной модели профессионализации, а ориентирована на рынок и развивается собственными усилиями ветеринарных врачей мелких домашних животных, не существующих за пределами ветеринарных клиник — своего организационного поля. В статье предложено описание данного организационного поля и проанализировано влияние его структуры на процессы профессионализации ветеринарных врачей мелких домашних животных.

This text was conceived as an attempt to describe the organizational field of veterinary medicine of companion animals in Russia and its impact on the processes of formation of the profession of veterinarians of companion animals as a separate professional group. Having emerged in the early 1990s in Russia as a separate branch of veterinary medicine, veterinary medicine of companion aimals has gone from intuitive practices of treating dogs and cats to a complex organizational field with many actors. Despite such rapid development, this area, unlike agricultural veterinary medicine, still considerably lacks strong institutional regulation. The profession of a veterinarian of companion animals does not live in the conventional continental model of professionalization for our region but it is market–oriented and develops through the veterinarians’ own efforts while they do not exist outside veterinary clinics — their own organizational field. The article 248 offers a description of this organizational field and analyzes the influence of its structure on the processes of professionalization of veterinarians of companion animals.

ветеринарная медицинамелкие домашние животныеорганизационное полепрофессионализацияveterinary medicinesmall petsorganizational fieldprofessionalizationReferencesБеккер Г. (1994) Природа профессии. Этика успеха: вестник исследователей, консультантов и ЛПР, выпуск 3/94.Becker H. (1994) The nature of the profession. Ethics of Success: Bulletin of Re- 271 searchers, Consultants and decision makers, issue 3/94. — in Russ.Домницкий И. Ю. (2017) История ветеринарной медицины: краткий курс лекций для обучающихся специальности «Ветеринария», Саратов.Domnitsky I.Yu. (2017) History of veterinary medicine: a short course of lectures for students of the specialty “Veterinary Medicine”, Saratov. — in Russ.Профессиональный стандарт «Ветеринарный врач» от 23 августа 2018 г. № 547н.Professional standard “Veterinarian” dated August 23, 2018 № 547n. — in Russ.Abbott A. (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, University of Chicago Press.Abbott A. (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, University of Chicago Press.Brown C. A., Elliott J., Schmiedt C. W., Brown S. A. (2016) Chronic kidney disease in aged cats: clinical features, morphology, and proposed pathogeneses. Veterinary pathology, 53(2): 309–326.Brown C. A., Elliott J., Schmiedt C. W., Brown S. A. (2016) Chronic kidney disease in aged cats: clinical features, morphology, and proposed pathogeneses. Veterinary pathology, 53(2): 309–326.Carr-Saunders A. M., Wilson P. A. (1933) The Professions. Clarendon.Carr-Saunders A. M., Wilson P. A. (1933) The Professions. Clarendon.Carr-Saunders A. M., Wilson P. A. (1944) Professions. Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, New York: The Macmillan Company. Vol. 12.Carr-Saunders A. M., Wilson P. A. (1944) Professions. Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, New York: The Macmillan Company. Vol. 12.Collins R. (1990) Market closure and the conflict theory of the professions. Professions in theory and history: Rethinking the study of the professions: 24‒43.Collins R. (1990) Market closure and the conflict theory of the professions. Professions in theory and history: Rethinking the study of the professions: 24‒43.Fligstein N. (2001) The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-FirstCentury Capitalist Societies, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Fligstein N. (2001) The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-FirstCentury Capitalist Societies, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Freidson E. (1988) Profession of Medicine. A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge, University of Chicago Press.Freidson E. (1988) Profession of Medicine. A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge, University of Chicago Press.Goode W. J. (1957) Community within a community: The professions. American sociological review, 22(2): 194–200.Goode W. J. (1957) Community within a community: The professions. American sociological review, 22(2): 194–200.Greenwood E. (1957) Attributes of a profession. Social work: 45–55.Greenwood E. (1957) Attributes of a profession. Social work: 45–55.Larson M. (1977) The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis, California: Universityof California.Larson M. (1977) The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis, California: Universityof California.Leicht K. T., Fennell M. L., Freidson E. (2003) Professional work, a sociological approach. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28(1).Leicht K. T., Fennell M. L., Freidson E. (2003) Professional work, a sociological approach. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28(1).Liu S. (2018) Boundaries and professions: Toward a processual theory of action. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5(1): 45–57.Liu S. (2018) Boundaries and professions: Toward a processual theory of action. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5(1): 45–57.Macdonald K., Ritzer G. (1988) The sociology of the professions: dead or alive? Work and Occupations, 15(3): 251–272.Macdonald K., Ritzer G. (1988) The sociology of the professions: dead or alive? Work and Occupations, 15(3): 251–272.McKinlay J. B., Arches J. (1985) Towards the proletarianization of physicians. International journal of health services, 15(2): 161–195.McKinlay J. B., Arches J. (1985) Towards the proletarianization of physicians. International journal of health services, 15(2): 161–195.Millerson G. (2013) The qualifying associations, Routledge.Millerson G. (2013) The qualifying associations, Routledge.Muzio D., Brock D. M., Suddaby R. (2013) Professions and institutional change: Towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions. Journal of management studies, 50(5): 699‒721.Muzio D., Brock D. M., Suddaby R. (2013) Professions and institutional change: Towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions. Journal of management studies, 50(5): 699‒721.Narayan U. (1999) The Project of Feminist Epistemology: Perspective from.Narayan U. (1999) The Project of Feminist Epistemology: Perspective from.Parkin F. (1979) Marxism and Class Theory: A bourgeois critique, London: Tavistock. Parsons T. (1939) The professions and social structure. Social forces, 17(4): 457–467.Parkin F. (1979) Marxism and Class Theory: A bourgeois critique, London: Tavistock. Parsons T. (1939) The professions and social structure. Social forces, 17(4): 457–467.Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. (Eds) (2012) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, University of Chicago press.Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. (Eds) (2012) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, University of Chicago press.Saks M. (2015) The professions, state and the market: Medicine in Britain, the United States and Russia, Routledge.Saks M. (2015) The professions, state and the market: Medicine in Britain, the United States and Russia, Routledge.Scott W. R. (2008) Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization studies, 29(2): 219–238.Scott W. R. (2008) Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization studies, 29(2): 219–238.Suddaby R., Muzio D. (2015) Theoretical perspectives on the professions. The Oxford handbook of professional service firms: 25–47.Suddaby R., Muzio D. (2015) Theoretical perspectives on the professions. The Oxford handbook of professional service firms: 25–47.Suddaby R., Viale T. (2011) Professionals and field-level change: Institutional work and the professional project. Current Sociology, 59(4): 423–442.Suddaby R., Viale T. (2011) Professionals and field-level change: Institutional work and the professional project. Current Sociology, 59(4): 423–442.Svensson L. G., & Evetts J. (2010) Sociology of professions. Continental and Anglo-Saxon Traditions, Gothenburg: Daidalos.Svensson L. G., & Evetts J. (2010) Sociology of professions. Continental and Anglo-Saxon Traditions, Gothenburg: Daidalos.Wilensky H. L. (1964) The professionalization of everyone? American journal of sociology, 70(2): 137–158.Wilensky H. L. (1964) The professionalization of everyone? American journal of sociology, 70(2): 137–158.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.