<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">socofpower</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Социология власти</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Sociology of Power</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2074-0492</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2413-144X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="edn" pub-id-type="custom">VKPLNS</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">socofpower-313</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Социотехническое в цифровой социологии: методологические возможности и ограничения</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Sociotechnical in Digital Sociology: Methodological Possibilities and Limitations</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Земнухова</surname><given-names>Лилия В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zemnukhova</surname><given-names>Liliia V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.соц.н., старший научный сотрудник, научный сотрудник Центра исследований науки и технологий</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in sociology</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">l.zemnukhova@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>СИ РАН — филиал ФНИСЦ РАН; Европейский университет в Санкт-Петербурге</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Sociological Institute of FCTAS RAS; European University at St. Petersburg</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>08</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>54</fpage><lpage>68</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Земнухова Л.В., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Земнухова Л.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zemnukhova L.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://socofpower.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/313">https://socofpower.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/313</self-uri><abstract><p>Изучение взаимодействия человека с техникой характеризовалось разной терминологией в зависимости от дисциплинарного направления и актуальных в тот или иной период времени масштабов распространения технологий. В данной статье речь пойдет об основных контекстах социотехнического - одного из понятий, которое широко применяется для описания систем и процессов и которое характеризуется тем, что их элементами или участниками являются и люди, и технологии. Такое компромиссное понятие возникло в инженерной исследовательской литературе в 1970-х годах, постепенно стало использоваться в социальных науках, а к середине 2000-х и вовсе стало повсеместно востребованным. Проблематика социотехнического продолжает усиливаться в связи с постоянно распространяющимися пользовательскими цифровыми технологиями, вместе с их барьерами, сложностями, ошибками и поломками. Работа преследует две цели. Во-первых, будет продемонстрирована динамика изучения социотехнического в разных дисциплинах. Для этого с помощью базы данных публикаций Scopus будут определены основные контексты, проблематики и темы релевантных исследований за период с 1969 года по настоящее время. Во-вторых, будут показаны особенности изучения социотехнического в исследованиях науки и технологий (STS) и цифровой социологии, в которых важное значение приобретает рефлексивность по отношению к исследовательскому процессу, данным, методам, интерпретациям. В результате будут рассмотрены возможности и ограничения изучения социотехнического в условиях технократического дискурса и развития цифровой экономики.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Depending on the disciplinary direction and the scale of technological diffusion that was relevant at the time, the study of human-computer interaction has been characterized by various concepts. This article will focus on the main contexts of the sociotechnical - one of the concepts that is widely used to describe systems and processes, and one that includes different elements or participants - people and technologies. Such trade-offs between social and technical concepts emerged in the engineering research literature in the 1970s, were gradually adopted in the social sciences, and reached the same level of disciplinary interest by the mid-2000s. The problem of the sociotechnical continues to grow in connection with the constantly expanding digital user technologies - together with their barriers, complexities, errors and breakages - which attracts the research attention of social scientists. This work has two goals. First, the dynamics of studying the sociotechnical in different disciplinary directions will be demonstrated. For this purpose, using the Scopus publications database, the main contexts, issues and topics of relevant research will be identified for the period from 1969 to the present. Secondly, the specific features of sociotechnical research in Science and Technology Studies (STS) and digital sociology - where reflexivity in relation to the research process, data, methods, and interpretations is of great importance - will be highlighted. In conclusion, the article considers the possibilities and limitations of studying sociotechnical in conditions of technocratic discourse and the development of the digital economy.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>социотехнические системы</kwd><kwd>исследования науки и технологий</kwd><kwd>цифровая социология</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>sociotechnical systems</kwd><kwd>science and technology studies</kwd><kwd>digital sociology</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Российского научного фонда (проект РНФ No17-78-20164) «Социотехнические барьеры внедрения и использования информационных технологий в современной России: социологический анализ»</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bijker W.Е., Law J. (1992) General Introduction. W.E. Bijker, J. Law (Eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 1-16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bijker W.Е., Law J. (1992) General Introduction. W.E. Bijker, J. Law (Eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 1-16.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bijker W.E. (1993) Do Not Despair: There Is Life after Constructivism. Science, Technology, Sr Human Values, 18(1) Theme Issue: Technological Choices (Winter): 113-138.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bijker W.E. (1993) Do Not Despair: There Is Life after Constructivism. Science, Technology, Sr Human Values, 18(1) Theme Issue: Technological Choices (Winter): 113-138.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bolter J., Gromala D. (2003) Windows and Mirrors: Interaction Design, Digital Art, and the Myth of Transparency. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: The MIT Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bolter J., Gromala D. (2003) Windows and Mirrors: Interaction Design, Digital Art, and the Myth of Transparency. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: The MIT Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bonen Z. (1979a) Evolution of a Sociotechnical System, A Model and Some Implications. Sloan School Working Paper.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bonen Z. (1979a) Evolution of a Sociotechnical System, A Model and Some Implications. Sloan School Working Paper.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bonen Z. (1979b) Evolutionary behavior of complex sociotechnical systems. Cambridge, Mass.: Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, M.I.T.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bonen Z. (1979b) Evolutionary behavior of complex sociotechnical systems. Cambridge, Mass.: Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, M.I.T.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boyd D. (2007) Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1): 210-230.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boyd D. (2007) Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1): 210-230.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carroll J. (2003) HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science. USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carroll J. (2003) HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science. USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Collins H., Evans R. (2002) The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2): 235-296.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Collins H., Evans R. (2002) The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2): 235-296.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Crocitto М., Mohamed A. (2003) Youssef: The human side of organizational agility. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 103(6): 388-397.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Crocitto М., Mohamed A. (2003) Youssef: The human side of organizational agility. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 103(6): 388-397.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harvey E. (1968) Technology and the Structure of Organizations. American Sociological Review, 33(2) (Apr): 247-259.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harvey E. (1968) Technology and the Structure of Organizations. American Sociological Review, 33(2) (Apr): 247-259.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hine C. (2015) Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Huntingdon, GBR: Bloomsbury Publishing.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hine C. (2015) Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Huntingdon, GBR: Bloomsbury Publishing.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kling R. (1992) When Gunfire Shatters Bone: Reducing Sociotechnical Systems to Social Relationships. Science, Technology Sr Human Values, 17(3): 381-385.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kling R. (1992) When Gunfire Shatters Bone: Reducing Sociotechnical Systems to Social Relationships. Science, Technology Sr Human Values, 17(3): 381-385.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Licklider J. (1960) Man-Computer Symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, Vol. HFE-1:4-11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Licklider J. (1960) Man-Computer Symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, Vol. HFE-1:4-11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Licklider J., Clark W. (1962) On-line man-computer communication. Proceeding AIEE-IRE '62 (Spring) Proceedings of the May 1-3:113-128.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Licklider J., Clark W. (1962) On-line man-computer communication. Proceeding AIEE-IRE '62 (Spring) Proceedings of the May 1-3:113-128.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Licklider J., Taylor R. (1968) The Computer as a Communication Device. Science and Technology. (April) 76:21-31.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Licklider J., Taylor R. (1968) The Computer as a Communication Device. Science and Technology. (April) 76:21-31.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lupton D. (2012) Digital Sociology: An Introduction. Sydney: Univeristy of Sydney.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lupton D. (2012) Digital Sociology: An Introduction. Sydney: Univeristy of Sydney.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сивков Д. (2017). Большие данные в этнографии: вызовы и возможности. Социология науки и технологий, 8(2): 56-67.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sivkov D. (2017). Bol’shie dannye v etnografii: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti [Big Data and Ethnography: Challenges and Opportunities]. Sotsiologiia nauki i tekhnologii [Sociology of Science and Technology], 8(2): 56-67.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
